Adam Smith and Bruce Yandle: Soda-Tax Support From Plenty of Baptists, But No Bootleggers


Earlier this month, residents of Berkeley, California, voted in a one-cent per ounce tax on sugary drinks, the first ever in the United States. As many as 30 previous attempts by U.S. cities and states to tax away sugar in soda have failed. What seems like the perfect opportunity for a "bootleggers and Baptists" style coalition to perform their political magic just hasn't played out, note economists Adam Smith and Bruce Yandle.
Smith and Yandle, co-authors of the recent book Bootleggers and Baptists: Explaining America's Regulatory Saga, can find plenty of "Baptists" in the soda-tax situation: groups such as the American Heart Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the NAACP that see sweet drinks as a major detriment to American health and well-being. But where are the bootleggers?
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?