Ira Stoll on Why Government-Funded Infrastructure Is a Terrible Idea

The new Congress hasn't even been elected yet, but it's already under pressure to add billions of dollars in new government spending to pay for "infrastructure." According to New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, for example, "We have huge infrastructure needs, especially in water and transportation, and the federal government can borrow incredibly cheaply…. So borrowing to build roads, repair sewers and more seems like a no-brainer." In response, Ira Stoll offers nine reasons why a burst of federal borrowing or taxing to pay for roads, bridges, sewers, and airport terminals would be a disastrous idea.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?