Obama Frets Over Seeming Hawkish Over Iraq Strikes
Reality bites.
As the president considers airstrikes in Syria against the group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, seeking a congressional imprimatur remains a politically tricky undertaking…
It is not just that many Democrats and even some Republicans are wary about endorsing a new American military venture. The White House is also wrestling with how to define the president's war-making authority in a way that does not undermine his claim last year that he had finally taken the United States off a permanent war footing.
A broad authorization — like those passed after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and before the Iraq war — would carry echoes of the George W. Bush administration, outrage Mr. Obama's antiwar liberal base and raise the specter of an open-ended conflict in Syria.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Turns out he's really good at killing people.