Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: Obama Plots Unilateral Climate Change Action, IRS Ethics Lawyer Faces Disbarment, Cease-Fire Holds in Gaza

Damon Root | 8.27.2014 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • Credit: White House / Flickr.com

    "The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress."

  • A lawyer in the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility may be stripped of her license to practice law after allegedly lying to a court-appointed board.
  • The cease-fire between Israel and Hamas is holding. But for how long?
  • The California Senate has passed legislation banning the use of warrantless drones by law enforcement.
  • The U.S. is reportedly recruiting allies for possible military action in Syria.
  • NATO is planning to build new bases in eastern Europe to counter Russian aggression.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Jackson Kuhl on a Court Decision Refusing Immunity to Police Over a Botched Raid

Damon Root is a senior editor at Reason and the author of A Glorious Liberty: Frederick Douglass and the Fight for an Antislavery Constitution (Potomac Books).

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (344)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Snark Plissken   11 years ago

    "The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress."

    What is the Constitution? ? a bit of paper written by dead white guys. I am the state ? I alone am here the representative of the people.

    1. Rich   11 years ago

      "I *triple-dog-dare* you to impeach me!"

      1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        Leave him alone it's all he has left in the form of redeeming himself.

    2. Andrew S.   11 years ago

      You libertarians always with your constitutional literalism. You have to read between the lines. Sure, it has all that stuff about the separation of powers, and congress passing laws for the President to sign and such, but what has that ever done for us? Nothing. The President has to get things done. And if Congress doesn't agree with him, well, then he has to get it done anyways!*

      *Note: In 2016, if Team Red wins the election, I will completely change my mind on all of this and freak out at the slightest hint of the President deciding to do anything on his own.

      /prog

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Hello.

      1. DEG   11 years ago

        Bonjour.

        Guten Morgen.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    "The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress."

    As long as the UN isn't involved.

    1. Drake   11 years ago

      Thank goodness this Administration is lazy and incompetent.

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Unfortunately the bureaucrats keep working away....

  3. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    The U.S. is reportedly recruiting allies for possible military action in Syria.

    Do we have any left?

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Well, we have Assad now.

      1. Libertarian   11 years ago

        Just a year ago, John Kerry compared Assad to Hitler. And now he's going to be on TV justifying the bombing of Hitler's enemies. I'll need more popcorn for this show.

        1. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

          Whom he wanted the US to help.

        2. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

          The US has always been at war with ISIS.

          Citizen, you need some doublethink training. Report to Room 101.

      2. gaijin   11 years ago

        Well, we have Assad now.

        Oh no we don't...we must deploy the bombings in an equitable, fair and balanced manner against Assad and ISIS/L...that way, whoever wins, we can be friends with them after.

        In an effort to avoid unintentionally strengthening the Syrian government, the White House could seek to balance strikes against the Islamic State with attacks on Assad regime targets.

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          Well that's just plain stupid. What's the point of selling out all your old allies if you're not going to buy new ones with the porceeds?

          1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

            Porceeds? Is that like proceeds from pork barrel spending? You may have attained a John-like level of typo.

            1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

              I was making typographical errors long before I came to reason to grouse about Cuomo.

        2. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

          I thought that was an Onion article, but no. Stupid is as stupid does.

          1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

            I thought it was Duffleblog.

        3. Rich   11 years ago

          "Bomb 'em all. Let Allah sort 'em out."

        4. Andrew S.   11 years ago

          Before clicking on that, I thought "there's no way this is serious. This has to be a joke of some kind".

          But, yeah. US foriegn policy, ladies and gentlemen.

          1. WTF   11 years ago

            Smart. Diplomacy.

            1. tarran   11 years ago

              Strategery!

        5. expat   11 years ago

          But I thought Obama followed the "don't do anything stupid" doctrine!?!? This clearly would violate the key tenet of that, wouldn't it?

          1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

            Obama follows the "don't do anything stupid" doctrine.

            1. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

              "I wouldn't call "Did no harm" a resume."

        6. The DerpRider   11 years ago

          So. Bomb everybody. Okie dokie.

        7. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

          Curious, has the U.S. ever been entangled in ever shifting alliances with enemies who quickly became allies of convenience? I'm ashamed to ask because I should know this but this Assad angle is really odd.

          1. Ted S.   11 years ago

            No. We've always been at war with East Asia.

        8. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

          Once again, the three rules:

          1. Never get involved in a civil war.
          2. If for some reason you ignore #1, pick a side.
          3. Make sure your side wins.

          1. Xeones   11 years ago

            Also: never get involved in a ground war in Asia.

            1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

              And never trifle with a Sicilian when death is on the line!

        9. Warty   11 years ago

          ...What???

        10. Spoonman.   11 years ago

          Oh wow.

  4. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    Star of reality show 'Sons of Guns' is arrested for child rape - just two weeks after being accused of molestation

    William Hayden, 49, arrested yesterday for the rape of an 11-year-old girl
    She claims he raped her almost daily and threatened her with violence
    The Sons of Guns star was also accused of child molestation on August 9

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....ation.html
    Charges like that are guilty until proven innocent.

    1. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

      He was just following the age-appropriate rule of half your age, minus thirteen years.

    2. WTF   11 years ago

      But he insisted that the claims were the work of a bitter ex-girlfriend who told authorities that he had molested the girl to get back at him for breaking up with her.

      Never underestimate the lengths to which a bitter ex will go to try to fuck up a man's life. Don't know what the truth is, but the timing of the allegations are at least worth a little skepticism.

    3. Florida Man   11 years ago

      I watched the first season and enjoyed it. Then they turned into a dating reality show and I stopped.

      1. WTF   11 years ago

        I stopped watching once they started emphasizing cannons and other big crap over cool pistols and rifles.

        1. Restoras   11 years ago

          I liked the episode where they restored two WW2 anti-tank guns. The hokey targets they set-up are so lame though - how about just putting a thick piece of steel up with a nice bulls-eye to see what it can do?

      2. Jordan   11 years ago

        Is that the one with the ridiculously hot daughter? I watched one episode.

        1. Drake   11 years ago

          She is hot in a kind of crazy-sexy Southern way.

        2. WTF   11 years ago

          No, the one with the ridiculously hot daughter was American Guns.

          1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

            Now that was a stupid show. And the prices that guy charges? Ridiculous.

            1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

              And dumb guys were willing to pay those prices to get a chance to sniff around that daughter.

              1. Drake   11 years ago

                I never believed the prices. They had to be for TV.

          2. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

            Oh my...

    4. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Hayden must not be a cop.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    The California Senate has passed legislation banning the use of warrantless drones by law enforcement.

    Judges, start your rubber stamps.

    1. trshmnster the terrible   11 years ago

      The police dog sniffed his ass? Either it's 6 more weeks of winter, or they've got drugs! Here's your warrant!

  6. Bee Tagger   11 years ago

    NATO is planning to build new bases in eastern Europe to counter Russian aggression

    But isn't winter coming?

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Do we have any scandanavian countries in NATO who can do the work? It'll allow the Germans to wait for spring to be deployed.

    2. Doctor Whom   11 years ago

      The French, Italians and Spanish are opposed while the Americans and British are supportive of the eastern European demands.

      America continues its role as the world's patsy. SMH.

      1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

        The French, Italians and Spanish are opposed

        That almost makes me reflexively support it.

    3. DJF   11 years ago

      NATO has cut it military and is still cutting. Why bother building new bases when they don't have enough military to fill up the bases they got?

      1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

        Why bother building new bases when they don't have enough military to fill up the bases they got?

        Preposition equipment, let the locals maintain it. That way if something bad happens, all you do is fly in the troops; or supply the Russians with NATO equipment, whichever comes first.

        1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

          REFORGER, arise!

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            I just had awesome inspiration from ignorance. I hadn't yet looked up the REFORGER exercises (they were last run in '93, so it's been a while) and the first thing that came to mind was the reanimation of a stricken giant robot. And I know which of my villains would make it too. Sadly, I have to save Reforger for Book 4, since Book 3 is already heavy with bad guys (Doctor Rudra breaks open a prison to get at someone who'd been locked up - the aftermath ain't pretty).

            1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

              I want a h/t!

              I enlisted in 1985, so as a Private in an Infantry unit, all we did was get ready for REFORGER (until the Wall fell).

              1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

                I want a h/t!

                Typical, Warrant comes up with idea, Commissioned takes credit.

                1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

                  Warrants don't come up with anything, except ways to avoid work.

              2. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

                I'll try to remember to add you to the semiserious acknowledgements.

                That reminds me, I need to come up with some for the 2nd book.

            2. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

              REFORGER 14 - "Cold War II, Electric Bugaloo"

          2. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

            Nah. It's pivot to the Pacific time. Kim chee and TEAM SPIRIT!

      2. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

        That is why the Italians and Spanish are objecting - would save a lot of $ to close Rota, Aviano, etc. A lot cheaper in Poland, Romania, and the Baltics.

        1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

          As long as we keep Moron.

      3. Restoras   11 years ago

        ^This.

        Without US military might NATO is an empty shell.

        Unless it is our forces that will be forward deployed in Eastern Europe in these new bases - they will just be bridgehead objectives for the Russians if/when they decide westward expansion is once again in their best interest.

        1. Drake   11 years ago

          You over-estimate the Russians. Their army is big but really shitty. The Germans and Poles can pin them down until American Armored units arrive.

          1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

            The Germans are a hollow joke now - but I would not underestimate the Poles.

            1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

              ...but I would not underestimate the Poles.

              Now that they have figured out they need to close the screen doors on their submarines.

            2. Drake   11 years ago

              I trained with the Germans. Not a big army but they seemed very competent and their gear is at least as good as ours.

              A little chilling to see guys in uniform yelling in German...

              1. WTF   11 years ago

                As long as they're not yelling "Sieg Heil".

              2. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

                They were in shit state in Afghanistan. Too busy dressing up like nuns, playing with skulls, working only 9-5 and drinking shitloads of beer at Camp Warehouse. they did have a decent radio station out of Konduz, if your music tastes ran to Euro stuff.

                1. Drake   11 years ago

                  I heard about that. Given all that we "accomplished" there, I think they had the correct attitude.

        2. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

          'Without US military might NATO is an empty shell.'

          Always was.

        3. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

          NATO was a single fire gun, which Cliton fired to distract from a blowjob. Kosovo was it.

          Attempts to reuse NATO will likely cause damage to the user.

        4. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

          Without US military might, the EU is impossible.

    4. Drake   11 years ago

      Are they really building new bases or just making the old Soviet bases fit for human habitation?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Is there actually a difference in the work involved?

        1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

          Oooh, yeah. In 1997, I went around a series of old Hungarian Warsaw Pact era bases to see baout getting them online to support SFOR in Bosnia (the places I went in Sarajevo were in better shape, many times) - they were miserable. Buried toxic waste, buildings full of asbestos and crumbling to boot.

          Better to start from scratch.

  7. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    Fusion Investigates: How did America's police departments lose loads of military-issued weapons?

    http://fusion.net/leadership/s.....ons-984250
    It appears that cops are taking these military weapons home. Or selling them. Who knows? We never will.

    1. WTF   11 years ago

      What are you gonna do, call the cops?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Naw, I'd call in an airstrike - Napalm as a warning shot, cluster munitions and carpet bombing if they don't return the monies stolen from the taxpayer.

        1. PD Scott   11 years ago

          Well, time to add Stingers to the 1033 program...

  8. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    Cannabis-infused fizzy drinks on sale in US
    The 'ridiculously relaxing' drinks come with 10mg of marijuana in cherry, lemon or pomegranate flavour

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new.....in-US.html
    I'd try it.

    1. Libertarian   11 years ago

      As "ridiculously relaxing" as listening to a Carpenters album while drinking chardonnay? I think not.

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Oh dear, I'm going to have to see Fuck Schumer's ugly mug on the local TV news tonight complaining about the alleged evil of this.

    3. DEG   11 years ago

      I've had hemp beer. Unfortunately no THC in it, but still tasty.

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Fermented rope?

        1. DEG   11 years ago

          http://www.humboldtbrewingco.com/hemp-ale/

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            Their site wanted personal information from me before I could enter.

            What does it matter what my age is? I'm not trying to buy from you!

            1. PD Scott   11 years ago

              Because our dear friends at BATFE believe if children - meaning anyone under 21 - see an alcohol website, they will be filled with an insatiable thirst for demon rum.

              Strangely, TV, radio and print commercials don't have the same effect.

              1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

                But, you don't see Jim Beam ads in Ranger Rick magazine. Or Bud Light commercials on Suite Life of Zack and Cody. So.... yeah.

      2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        This homebrewing forum I frequent will soon have some marijuana beer recipes I suspect, being that some of the participants live in WA and CO.

  9. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    Megan Fox sizzles in a strapless mini dress at Seoul premiere of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles... as she insists her character is more than just a sexy sidekick

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....ekick.html

    Leaving everyone starry-eyed! Megan Fox puts on a leggy display in patterned sheer dress at Seoul press call for Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....rtles.html
    She's got that trailer trash chic that just turns sarc on! Hell yeah!

    1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      I do enjoy me some megan fox. I don't care how trashy she is.

    2. RBS   11 years ago

      She's hot. It drives my wife crazy that I think so too.

      1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        Yea she's in the realm of like Jennifer Love Hewitt where women everywhere seem to hate her.

        1. lap83   11 years ago

          It's easier to appreciate an attractive member of your own sex if they don't seem to have the personality of a turd.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    NATO is planning to build new bases in eastern Europe to counter Russian aggression.

    Some towns are going to get an unexpected economic boost!

  11. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    Bikini clad Liv Tyler is a bathing beauty as she takes a dip in the sea during Spanish getaway with boyfriend Dave Gardner

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....rdner.html
    From the comments:

    "put a lock on the fridge"
    "A bit hefty, too many chips and ice cream on holiday I think."
    "Save the whale!!"

    In other words, John would.

    1. RBS   11 years ago

      She's put on some lbs since Stealing Beauty

    2. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

      In other words, John would.

      Bob would too.

      She's 37 years old, and still pretty damn smokin'.

      1. Furburguesa   11 years ago

        FB would hit that like she owed me $$

  12. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    'Modern Icon' Gigi Hadid goes braless in clingy white T-shirt for provocative fashion shoot

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....shoot.html
    Best. Titties. Ever.

    1. DEG   11 years ago

      I don't know about the best, but she is up there.

    2. Mongo   11 years ago

      Sarctastic!

  13. Bee Tagger   11 years ago

    "but without ratification from Congress."

    do-nothing Congress strikes again.

  14. SugarFree   11 years ago

    Not only did he have a buttplug made in his likeness, he won't even it share it with Michelle.

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      *blinks in surprise, then remembers it is SugarFree*

      1. SugarFree   11 years ago

        A severely sleep-deprived SugarFree as well. I've gotten a grand total of 30 hours of sleep since waking up Saturday morning.

        Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          Step away from the keyboard.

          1. SugarFree   11 years ago

            HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

          2. Marshall Gill   11 years ago

            No, stay at the keyboard. A lack of sleep might produce horrors not even yet imagined!

        2. Jordan   11 years ago

          Wait... isn't that an average of 7.5 hours a night?

          1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

            He meant Saturday morning, July 26th.

          2. SugarFree   11 years ago

            Shit. I meant 20. And I woke up in France on Saturday, which is 6 hours ahead.

            So tired. You want to take it out back, Jordan? Huh?

            1. Jordan   11 years ago

              I know better than to get within 100 meters of you.

              1. tarran   11 years ago

                Good idea, the man has demonstrated that he knows how to take a bullet and still spit venom.

              2. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

                I know better than to get within 100 meters miles of you.

                Fixed.

            2. gaijin   11 years ago

              You want to take it out back,

              Coming from you this has to be some kind of innuendo, right?

              1. SugarFree   11 years ago

                Only in the sense that there is an alley somewhere out behind the blog.

              2. trshmnster the terrible   11 years ago

                I'll free you from sugar, sugar!

            3. RBS   11 years ago

              And I woke up in France on Saturday

              You say that like you weren't necessarily supposed to be there.

              1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

                He woke up in a bathtub of ice, missing a kidney.

              2. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

                did you ever have one of those days where you woke up in France... in a back alley... surrounded by snails

                1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

                  did you ever have one of those days where you woke up in France... in a back alley... surrounded by snails

                  Live or dead snails?

                  1. SugarFree   11 years ago

                    I have all my kidneys. And a few extra.

                  2. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

                    a mix.

    2. PRX   11 years ago

      this is my buttplug
      this is my thumb
      this one's for my anus
      and so's the other one.

    3. trshmnster the terrible   11 years ago

      Uhhhhhhhhhhh, look Michelle.. Iiii've got my head up my ass!

      /Barack Obama and the Buttplug of Boom

  15. DEG   11 years ago

    "Live Free or Die" has its limits. No masturbation allowed on NH highways.

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      I can't complain about that. Get off the highway to do that, don't get off on the highway, you're a danger to everyone on the road.

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        That's only for the driver. What about the passengers?

        And what happens when we get driverless cars?

    2. Rich   11 years ago

      But *hands-free* masturbation is still OK, right?

      1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        that's the best kind.

    3. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      Do they have any hard evidence that will stand up in court?

      1. trshmnster the terrible   11 years ago

        They need to erect a new statute

        1. Rich   11 years ago

          One that has as its main thrust a stiff penalty.

          1. Entropy Void   11 years ago

            I think the Highway Safety Staff is working hard on that angle.

      2. DEG   11 years ago

        Ask Trooper Cummings. He's handling the voyeur line... er... incident witness line.

  16. DEG   11 years ago

    Government always holds the trump card in property purchase and lease negotiations.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      I like how the page has an "order reprints" link.

      I didn't like how it had a popover of some sort that I couldn't get to close since I didn't have images set to load.

  17. DEG   11 years ago

    Bill Gates donates money to a gun control group.

    1. thom   11 years ago

      Good for him. Backing up his opinions, however misguided, with his own fucking money.

    2. mad.casual   11 years ago

      Bill Gates donates money to a gun control group.

      He and Ballmer split a $500K "donation"; are we sure they didn't accidentally drop the money and the gun-law advocacy group just picked it up and claimed it as a donation? I'm sure they have no problem accepting cash made selling copies of Grand Theft Auto.

  18. Adans smith   11 years ago

    it goes like this.I know many in your country don't have electricity ,or clean water,but,We got ours sucker,kneel

  19. Rich   11 years ago

    Obama eyes transgendered troops

    the Pentagon "likely will" allow transgendered Americans to serve openly in the military where 15,500 now secretly serve

    "15,500 transgendered Americans now secretly serve in the US military"?

    Sorry, but I find that difficult to believe.

    1. SugarFree   11 years ago

      All those women wearing pants with short haircuts? He might be right about something, for once.

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        He's undressing them with his eyes?

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          Private eyes.
          Omaba's watching you.
          He knows your every move.
          Or can read about it in the paper.

    2. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Well there is this one odd Division...

      1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

        1st? 3rd? 25th? 101st?

        1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

          1st?

          Of course, it is one odd division.

          1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

            A big red one at that.

            1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

              "The Big Red Dumb"

              1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

                "The Big Red Dumb"

                You are pushing it Swiss. Served there during DS/DS, got out in '94.

                1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

                  That is what our instructors from the 1st ID called it themselves, when I was mobilizing through there in 2007 for TEH SURGE.

                  "Where the Hell are the buses to get everyone to the range?"

                  "Big Red Dumb, sir."

                  1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

                    Of course, they had just gotten back from Iraq themselves, so they were in a rather cynical mode of humor.

                    1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

                      I am just messing with you Swiss. I have called them a lot worse.

                    2. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

                      To be sure - I got attached to the 25th ID and I think I called them #$%&, *&^@#$% and !@#$*&

                2. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

                  If you're gonna be one, be a "BIG RED ONE"!

        2. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

          I'd have guessed the 42nd.

          1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

            Nicely done.

          2. Drake   11 years ago

            I still have that fucking rainbow on my old National Guard uniforms.

          3. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

            D-w-T wins one internets*.

            *offer good for 30 mins.

      2. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

        Pansy Division

    3. Libertarian   11 years ago

      They know how many? Doesn't sound so secret to me.

    4. WTF   11 years ago

      If they're serving 'secretly', how do they know how many there are?

    5. Ted S.   11 years ago

      So he's going to pardon Bradley Manning?

    6. John   11 years ago

      Maybe if you count every woman who likes to wear slacks and every man who ever dressed in drag while having fun with his wife, perhaps.

      You have to remember these people see everything in terms of politics. It is all progs know. So they don't give a shit about facts or if the military is actually doing the job it is supposed to do. To them, the military, like everything else in the world is just another thing to be subverted into a weapon advancing Prog politics.

      1. mad.casual   11 years ago

        To them, the military, like everything else in the world is just another thing to be subverted into a weapon advancing Prog politics.

        Exactly, nevermind that the policy has been in force at the whim of the President and the SOD, and that the conventional treatments for the disease are marginally effective and not exactly related to the military's best interests. This is about freedom and letting people know that the Pres. is extremely tolerant and accepting when choosing people to send into the meat grinder in the ME.

    7. Agammamon   11 years ago

      Not if you consider that 'transgender' means that they think they are the wrong sex, not that they have sexual traits of both sexes.

      Essentially what this means is claiming to be transgender will get you an exemption from the gender-specific uniform/civilian attire regs.

      Unfortunately, not (as *should* be the case) stripping out the gender specific requirements/prohibitions - this whole 'guys get their heads shaved in basic but women don't' crap is bullshit anyway.

    8. Entropy Void   11 years ago

      Does anybody know if "the Transgendered" are subject to Selective Service ... either way?

      1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

        I don't think there's a transgendered exemption to the selective service registration.

        Fuck Ronald Regan's decomposing corpse.

        1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

          Or Reagan.

    9. Steve G   11 years ago

      That former SEAL was convincing to the eyes, but not to the ears. Whoa nellie. Like listening to Michael Clark Duncan talk

  20. DEG   11 years ago

    World's most expensive apartment goes up for sale. Your daily dose of wealth envy is in the comments section.

    1. Drake   11 years ago

      Maybe he can afford a house now.

    2. Agammamon   11 years ago

      Eh - I wanted to know how much the *rent* was.

  21. DEG   11 years ago

    Not everything on CNN today is shit. Travel photographs of the day includes some nice shots. I like the pictures of Banff and Queenstown, NZ.

    1. gaijin   11 years ago

      Banff and the Lake Louise area are spectacular...

  22. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    "The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress."

    We have to act, and act now!

    1. Tim   11 years ago

      Turns out ISIS is releasing way too much CO2.

    2. Rich   11 years ago

      "Ha! We'll just deem that treaty an 'agreement'!"

  23. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Oh dear me.

    The comments at the NYT linked regarding Obama's climate change plans.

    Very depressing save for a couple of sane people looking that the problem and consequences of ignoring Congress and the Constitution. But they dwarf by the amount of people who say action is needed because climate.

    I love Ken the scientist. 'I'm a scientist but not a climate scientist and climate change is real.'

    No shit, sparky. It's always been 'real.' Weather and climate change. I'm no scientist period but even I understand weather and climate patterns shift.

    Just don't try and convince me the world is about to end while Hilary flies around in her own private jet.

    Respectfully, fuck off.

    1. Libertarian   11 years ago

      I can't believe you've got the guts to read NYT comments. (although I did it once on a Krugman columnn -- I'm still shaking uncontrollably).

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        I do so like I once ate foie gras.

        1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

          Foie gras is delicious.

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

            I could have picked any food I dislike and someone would have responded the opposite. I could have written the brains of little orphan children and someone would have written, 'but they're delicious!'

            Damned if I do, damned if I don't.

            Sigh.

            1. Entropy Void   11 years ago

              "Damned if I do, damned if I don't."

              I am surprised that, being Kanukistanish, you are not used to that by now ...

              1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

                That's a new one. Kanukistanish.

    2. chmercier   11 years ago

      Oh, NYT comments.

      Not to offend any New Yorkers here, but a lot of the limo-libs there are the most provincial, short-sighted, and closed minded people. There are fewer trees in NY one day, so nature is dying and all the trees must be saved. The East River is polluted so all water in the world is bad. NY is crowded, so the entire earth is an urban wasteland.

      So, yeah, NYT commenters. Might as well as a penguin what lamb tastes like.

      (PS - NotAllNewYorkers lol. I've met a lot of New Yorkers, city and upstate, who are not like that at all. It's the lim-libs, permanent students, and public sector employees typically. I've met a few who liked the city life, but hated the costs and all the rules.)

  24. SugarFree   11 years ago

    GARY BUSEY IS MY SPIRIT ANIMAL

    1. Tim   11 years ago

      There aren't enough Garey Busey stories in the news if you ask me.

    2. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      That is the most Busey, Gary Busey story ever.

    3. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

      I'm pretty somebody should have smacked her momma a long time ago.

  25. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

    The cease-fire between Israel and Hamas is holding. But for how long?

    I'm going with until Hamas refills the TO&E and identifies a new set of targets. Call it, 5 days.

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Might take a bit longer to reload, with their infrastructure/tunnels all banged in.

    2. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

      I imagine Hamas bombs Israel to distract the locals from internal scandals. Sorta like Obama.

  26. The DerpRider   11 years ago

    9 year old accidentally kills instructor with Uzi. My 10 year old daughter shoots a rifle, don't think I'd had her an Uzi...

    1. The DerpRider   11 years ago

      *hand

    2. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      The instructor clearly didn't do their job properly, serves them right. Feel sorry for the girl though, having to live with killing someone at that age.

    3. Tim   11 years ago

      Malpractice. Now you're dead dumbass.

    4. tarran   11 years ago

      That's fucking insane!

      It's always a bad idea to hand anyone a semi-auto or automatic weapon that they lack the strength to control.

      Wasn't there a woman who shot herself in the head when the recoil of a handgun twisted it in her hand so that it was pointed at her head and her finger was depressing the trigger a second time?

      I don't blame the girl. The instructor, though, seems to have earned that Darwin award.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        Let's include the parents in the stupid awards as well.

      2. Warty   11 years ago

        Wasn't there a woman who shot herself in the head when the recoil of a handgun twisted it in her hand so that it was pointed at her head and her finger was depressing the trigger a second time?

        It was a .500 S&W. S&W for some stupid reason made the decision to make those double-action. So it's common for those to double because the recoil causes the shooter to clamp down with their shooting hand.

    5. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      Here honey, here's your first grenade. Just pull that pin....

    6. Warty   11 years ago

      There was a case a couple years ago where a kid couldn't handle the recoil of a submachine gun and blew his head off. And there have been a couple cases of people having women shoot .454 Casulls or similarly stupid large revolvers, and the girls blowing their heads off because the recoil brings the muzzle whipping around.

      Don't be a dipshit. And when guns are involved, DON'T FUCKING BE A FUCKING DIPSHIT.

      1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

        And wear appropriate clothing.

      2. Briggie   11 years ago

        I can't even count how many times I have seen YouTube videos of people handing a woman or a young person a large caliber weapon, and it is obvious they can't handle the recoil. Is it bad that I was waiting for someone to get shot?

  27. Coeus   11 years ago

    What?

    Nor does the right to vote have anything to do with conscription, which is the requirement to register for military service in case of national emergency. Though the draft is technically still in place in the US, no one actually signs up for it anymore

    Now that bit of blindness is what they really mean by privilege.

    1. The DerpRider   11 years ago

      no one signs up for it anymore

      No women ever signed up for it...

    2. tarran   11 years ago

      Soooo, Rebecca Watson must not know too many men who had to get student loans to attend college.

      1. thom   11 years ago

        Or a single person who is both male and a federal worker...

        1. chmercier   11 years ago

          Or a male who didn't get a nice phone call one day saying "federal offence not to sign..."

    3. John   11 years ago

      As usual it is all about their privilege and everyone else' responsibility. They should have the privilege to serve in the military if they choose to but only men should have the responsibility of being forced to serve in a national emergency.

    4. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      If you are a man ages 18 through 25 and living in the U.S., then you must register with Selective Service. It's the law. According to law, a man must register with Selective Service within 30 days of his 18th birthday. Selective Service will accept late registrations but not after a man has reached age 26.

      https://www.sss.gov/default.htm

      1. Entropy Void   11 years ago

        This is what I was engaging with the question about "the Transgendered" above ...

  28. userve32   11 years ago

    Wow man that makes no sense at all to me dude. None.

    http://www.CryptAnon.tk

  29. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Lissen up, bigorati!

    For many, no facts will invade their opinion. But the current climate of mistrust is not sustainable. To repair the relationship, citizens must calm the rhetoric that assumes our nation's police ranks are filled with psychotic brutes. Police leaders must take a breath and make innovative efforts to communicate with an unsettled public. Violent men and woman will continue to threaten our communities and police will continue to seek better ways to respond to the violence they encounter. Together the great American spirit of balancing freedom with responsibility can be the unifying force of reform wherever it is needed.

    The Total Security State PR push is ramping up.

    Learn to love Big Authority, America. Stop resisting.

    1. John   11 years ago

      In other words, if you racist tea baggers insist on keeping your weapons, then fuck you and learn to deal with violent, over armed and unaccountable police.

    2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      Violent men and woman will continue to threaten our communities and police will continue to seek better ways to respond to the violence they encounter employ them.

    3. Rich   11 years ago

      While I don't have unique access to the details of that deadly encounter, I am familiar with the science of officer-involved shootings.

      Emphasis added.

      "As a matter of fact, I have a *doctorate* in that science."

      1. John   11 years ago

        The science is settled!!!

        1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

          Consensus!

          1. trshmnster the terrible   11 years ago

            Damn deniers!

      2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        the science of officer-involved shootings.

        I imagine that's like climate science where a consensus of cops say that all of them, without exception, are justified.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

          It's science bitches, now shut up

    4. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

      "Citizens must calm the rhetoric that assumes our nation's police ranks are filled with psychotic brutes"

      If it's just the rhetoric that's the problem, is it okay if we assume our nation's police ranks are filled with psychotic brutes--just so long as we don't talk about it?

      I wonder if this guy has heard of the Stanford prison experiment.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.....experiment

    5. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Police leaders must take a breath and make innovative efforts to communicate with an unsettled public.

      It's not that innovative not to fill your ranks with psychotic brutes.

      1. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

        I think he means facebook and twitter.

        From the Ferguson police department, it wouldn't surprise me if their first tweet went something like:

        "We're gonna kick your asses. We're gonna kick ALL your asses!"

        1. Whahappan?   11 years ago

          "And we're gonna get away with it!"

    6. Warty   11 years ago

      It may be hard to hear, but we live quite safely in the United States thanks in large part to our law enforcement system.

      There it is. The Thin Blue Line keeps the wolves at bay, so shut up and do as you're told.

      1. thom   11 years ago

        Yeah, it's totally the threat that the cops are going to come and take a report that keeps the burglars out of my house. It has nothing to do with my neighbors knowing when somebody shouldn't be there...

        1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

          There was a rash of break-ins in my neighborhood over the last month. Police were baffled and had no suspects. A burglar was shot and killed by a homeowner two weeks ago. I think the rash of break-ins is over. Thanks police.

          Oh, wait.

  30. Ted S.   11 years ago

    Gotta love those TOP MEN:

    ASIC says staff misunderstanding of internet led to 250,000 websites being blocked

    The corporate regulator has revealed that it accidentally blocked access to a quarter of a million websites because its staff misunderstood a basic feature of internet technology.

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission made the blunder when it was trying to black-list a small number of websites it suspected of defrauding Australians.

    But it says staff who ordered the block didn't realise that suspending access to the site would affect many more hosted on the same IP address.

    The Internet is a series of tubes!

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      On a related note, I think Oman has one public IP address for the whole country and just NATs and proxies everything on the inside.

  31. Coeus   11 years ago

    A book review with a dose of total political bullshit.

    The affected Hadens population around the world is a population in need: those experiencing Lock In require continual medical care as they remain trapped in bed. Pilotable robots allow them to reintegrate into public life, while a virtual agora allows them to interact in virtual space. Unlocked explores some of the underlying discrimination issues through a couple of dates: individuals not permitted to frequent restaurants (as they take up space), while marriages and childrearing causes its own set of problems for Hadens. The equipment and care required to keep Hadens alive isn't cheap, and the threat of cutting down funding is reminiscent of talks of cutting social security. Bernie Sanders would certainly be an advocate for this program. In Lock In, Scalzi uses the book for a good bit of commentary throughout: Hadens, despite their robotic bodies, are still people. Angry protesters going out and hitting Hadens (or Threeps, as their robotic bodies are known) with bats, or running them over with cars, is eerily reminiscent of the anger we've seen in protests over the last couple of years, and that's no coincidence.

    Yes, all of those Tea Party rallies have been so violent. Assault and rapes and...

    Nevermind, those were the give me more goodies rallies.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Refusing to fund an army of GS15 diversity coordinators and giving billions to various cronies in the name of "green energy" is totally the same as refusing to help the profoundly disabled.

    2. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Scalzi was good....once.

      1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

        Old Man's War and Ghost Brigades were fucking awesome but Scalzi was always a dickbag.

        1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

          I stopped reading his blog a while back. TOPMENITIS

          1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

            Yeah, my dad got me into him gifting me OMW and GB. I then checked out his blog and had a feeling it was only a matter of time before he went all Eric Flint on me. Bummer.

  32. John   11 years ago

    This climate treaty is history repeating itself as comedy. The idea is to sign an agreement that is so weak it never has to be put to a vote and then "naming and shaming" any government that doesn't live by it. Seriously, that is their idea. They honestly think that people are going to willing regulate themselves into poverty to avoid being "shamed" by the international elites. Good luck with that.

    1. tarran   11 years ago

      I expect it will be particularly toothless since:
      1) Everyone has figured out that Obama is the sick man of the Western Hemisphere.

      2) No way the Aussies, the Chinese or the Japanese agree to anything meaningful.

      3) The Russians will push it to promote forcing Europe to buy Russain natural gas to make up for all the Western European power plants that are being shut down by the watermelons. The Brits will be all for it because England has collectively gone mad.

      4) The French will love it because they have their nukes, but they are riven by a huge internal political battle and no faction will want to look pro-American because they hate Americans with their JR Ewing and television shows that everyone wants to watch.

      5) The Germans will try to sign something as toothless as possible to keep the watermelons on board without making them even more dependent on Russian good will.

      And, in the end, I predict Obama will make such an ass of himself that there will be nothing more than a tepid memorandum of understanding.

      1. John   11 years ago

        At most he will have an MOU to justify what he was going to do anyway. And it will all be repudiated by the next administration, be it R or D. It is funny how cheap of a date the greens really are.

        1. tarran   11 years ago

          I don't think they are cheap dates at all. They are the most expensive kind, the ones who insist that you buy them $500 bottles of wine that they then use as mouthwash.

    2. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

      The US President is intentionally going to negotiate and sign a treaty for the express purpose of shaming the US.

      Do I have this right?

      So Obama is ashamed of his country? We are just not good enough for him.

      1. John   11 years ago

        No Cato, we are not. America and the world really has let his greatness down. We just weren't worthy of such a man.

        1. Restoras   11 years ago

          Know who else let his greatness down and wasn't worthy of such a man?

        2. Whahappan?   11 years ago

          This is what progs actually believe!

  33. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    I don't blame the girl. The instructor, though, seems to have earned that Darwin award.

    I' be interested to know if the guy "warmed her up" on something else, like a .22, to see how she handled it.

    Remember, boys and girls, the leading cause of death is stupidity.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Handing an automatic weapon to a child. What could possibly go wrong?

  34. Andrew S.   11 years ago

    Cop (in non-police garb) sues for brutality after he's roughed up by other cops.

    I'm not sure whether to feel sorry for him or not.

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      The City of Philadelphia, he said in his civil suit, encourages and is deliberately indifferent to the abuse of police powers. Among other accusations, Ruff claims the city tolerates officers who misrepresent facts in order to establish probable cause, and allows officers to have persons falsely arrested or maliciously prosecuted. He also asserts the city permits the continued employment of officers who are psychologically or emotionally unfit to serve.

      You don't say?!

  35. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

    Denver cops may start wearing body cameras. We can hope.

    http://kdvr.com/2014/08/27/den.....-officers/

  36. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Naked man busted watching porn, having sex with mattress outside old people's home in North Ireland

    The 52-year-old man was reportedly spotted entering the premises of Lavery Fold Old People's Home in Derry at 5 a.m.

    Cops were called and said they found him writhing around on the springs behind a fence.

    "He was laying on a mattress naked from the waist down with his trousers and underwear down by his ankles, and he was simulating sex with the mattress," a Police Service of Northern Ireland report states.

    1. trshmnster the terrible   11 years ago

      [insert epi's mom joke here]

  37. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Study finds less domestic violence among married couples who smoke pot

    "These findings suggest that marijuana use is predictive of lower levels of aggression towards one's partner in the following year." Leonard says. "As in other survey studies of marijuana and partner violence, our study examines patterns of marijuana use and the occurrence of violence within a year period. It does not examine whether using marijuana on a given day reduces the likelihood of violence at that time.

    "It is possible, for example, that?similar to a drinking partnership?couples who use marijuana together may share similar values and social circles, and it is this similarity that is responsible for reducing the likelihood of conflict.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Smoking pot chills you out. They are called "drunken brawls" and not "stoned brawls" for a reason.

    2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      I knew this guy whose super-hot wife would freak out when they ran out of pot. She'd start punching him until he went and got some more. True story.

  38. Jon Lester   11 years ago

    Russian aggression? When's the last time they overthrew a government on a NATO member's border? Has the CSTO been expanding westward?

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Ah, we can always count on someone to ride and justify Russian anything.

    2. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

      When's the last time they overthrew a government on a NATO member's border?

      You mean other than Ukraine?

  39. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    The Detroit suburbs are arming to the teeth

    Oakland County ? one of the richest communities in the country ? received over $4.5 million more in equipment and supplies than did Wayne County, where crime is high and law-enforcement budgets are financially strapped. (The dollar amounts in the data refer to what the military originally paid for the equipment.)

    Last year, there were 19 murders in Oakland County; in Wayne County, there were 355. Robberies in Oakland County numbered 615, compared with 6,050 in Wayne County.

    Yet Oakland received almost double the number of rifles that Wayne did, 491 compared to 265, respectively. Oakland even received a mine-resistant, ambush-protected armored vehicle (MRAP), designed to protect soldiers from land mines ? hardly an issue affecting any suburban police force.

    1. John   11 years ago

      In fairness, if I lived next to Detroit, I would want to be armed too.

      1. RBS   11 years ago

        I'd want one of those armored houses from The Purge.

    2. sarcasmic   11 years ago


      Last year, there were 19 murders in Oakland County; in Wayne County, there were 355. Robberies in Oakland County numbered 615, compared with 6,050 in Wayne County.

      I wonder how many were solved. Or even investigated. Probably not many. I mean, investigating crimes with victims conflicts with officer safety.

  40. John   11 years ago

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/.....m=referral

    Obama is just a victim of bad luck. Heinlein lives!!!

    The reasons offered for why bad things aren't his doing fall into three different categories: (1) The system is broken, the country is polarized, and the Republicans have become too insane to deal with; (2) stuff happens, and no one at all can do much about it; and (3) people think that the president ought to be Superman and solve all their problems, which is really expecting too much. As Joshua Keating wrote on July 21 in Slate: "There's a tendency to judge U.S. foreign policy on the condition of the world at any given moment rather than the success of actual actions taken," as if the condition and the actions can have no conceivable link

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      He's gonna need a bigger dust buster to clean up the mess!

    2. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

      In reality, Obama has been extremely lucky.

      If fracking technology had not unlocked immense reserves of domestic oil and gas, the US would be experiencing much higher inflation and a much worse labor market.

      Obama gets zero credit for fracking, but at least he didn't issue an executive order to ban it.

      1. John   11 years ago

        Yet

        And yes he has been lucky, if for no other reason than there hasn't yet been another major terrorist attack on his watch or a real international catastrophe like North Korea finally going belly up or India and Pakistan nuking each other.

  41. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Ivy League Professor Calls Video Music Award Winner Racist For Not Being Black

    It's one thing to lament that black Americans historically have not gotten much credit for the transformative music they created ? and another to say that non-black musicians are somehow racist because they won an award.

    That's the thrust of a tweet by Anthea Butler, a University of Pennsylvania religious studies professor, responding to the award winners at Sunday night's MTV Video Music Awards.

    As The Blaze notes, Butler was apparently offended that pop star Ariana Grande ? who is of Italian descent ? won a VMA. Her fellow nominees included two black musicians, Pharrell Williams and Jason Derulo, Campus Reform notes.

    1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

      It's one thing to lament that black Americans historically have not gotten much credit for the transformative music they created

      Wait.. what?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        Imma let you finish...

      2. SugarFree   11 years ago

        They didn't get sufficient recognition in the past and all the praise in the present won't change the past therefore the past can always be held against you forever, especially if you didn't have anything to do with the past whatsoever.

        It's the One Drop Rule of Cultural Grievance.

        1. John   11 years ago

          They never got any credit in the past. I mean it is not like Jazz was ever a big thing or people like Louis Armstrong or Duke Ellington were ever popular or made any money in their lifetimes.

          1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

            It's not like Dr. Dre is a fucking BILLIONAIRE.

          2. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

            I mean it is not like Jazz was ever a big thing

            Or the Blues, BB King, John Lee Hooker, Muddy Waters, Etta James, come on.

          3. SugarFree   11 years ago

            Most of this thought spins out of Afrocentrism spawned in by 60s Black radicals and the Nation of Islam. Black people invented everything, but it was stolen from them. Black people invented the entire ancient world, and so the modern world is really their invention as well. This is where you get the widespread notions that Socrates was Black, or Cleopatra was Black (or that all the Egyptians of antiquity were Black Africans.) It's probably the genesis of the Black Jesus movement as well.

            It's just another flavor of conspiracy theory and the idea the "[my group] actually invented every thing and every thought" pops us in many different places.

            1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

              I remember my very first experience with a person indoctrinated with Afrocentrism. A young college student who should have 1) smacked her father for raising a credulous fool and 2) sued her college for fraud to recover her tuition money.

            2. John   11 years ago

              There was a Classics scholar who completely destroyed the "Africans invented everything" thesis back in the 1980s. The woman became a pariah. Everything she said was true and no one could really deny it. She was just an evil racist for saying it.

            3. tarran   11 years ago

              It's very sad, since everyone knows it was the Scots and the Turks that invented everything.

              1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

                Yes, if you consider 'fucking sheep and little boys' everything.

            4. John   11 years ago

              Of course, southern blacks didn't get any influence from the music of the Scots-Irish. Nope. They just sprang forth from Africa singing the blues.

              1. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

                Fuckin' A. Hillbillies have NEVER gotten the credit they deserve.

          4. WTF   11 years ago

            Fats Domino, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Bo Diddley, none of them ever got any recognition.

    2. Spoonman.   11 years ago

      That's the same professor who called for the Benghazi video-maker to be in jail before anybody knew he was on probation.

  42. Coeus   11 years ago

    Turning around is anti-woman and racist.

    Sofia Vergara's 'turn' at the Emmys was a gross, stereotypical objectification
    A celebration of industry diversity shouldn't feature a Latina woman spun around like a piece of meat on a vertical spit

    1. thom   11 years ago

      If only Sofia Vergara could calmly sit down and show this lady her bank statements...

  43. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    The Welfare State

    1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

      According to calculations by Harvard's Greg Mankiw, based on data from the Office of Management and Budget, roughly 60 percent of Americans receive more in government benefits than they pay in federal taxes. A Tax Foundation study suggests that as many as 70 percent of Americans are net recipients of government largesse. Those numbers will only grow worse in the future.

      Increasingly, the welfare state is us.

  44. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    yeah...it's research... that's it.

    Former Acting HHS Cyber Security Director Convicted for Engaging in Child Pornography Enterprise

    Timothy DeFoggi, 56, formerly of Germantown, Maryland, is the sixth individual to be convicted as part of an ongoing investigation targeting three child pornography websites. The three websites were run by a single administrator, who has since been convicted in the District of Nebraska of engaging in a child exploitation enterprise in connection with his administration of the sites.

    According to evidence presented at trial, DeFoggi registered as a website member on March 2, 2012, and maintained his membership and activity until Dec. 8, 2012, when the website was taken down by the FBI. Through the website, DeFoggi accessed child pornography, solicited child pornography from other members, and exchanged private messages with other members where he expressed an interest in the violent rape and murder of children. DeFoggi even suggested meeting one member in person to fulfill their mutual fantasies to violently rape and murder children.

    1. John   11 years ago

      The fact that HHS employed a pervert doesn't really reflect poorly on them. How were they supposed to know? It is not like he listed "deviant" on his resume.

      What does reflect poorly on HHS, however, is the fact that their "Cyber Security Director" is apparently so poorly versed in internet anonymity that he managed to get snagged by the FBI. Something tells me this guy doesn't know much about cyber security.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      What is wrong with people?

      1. tarran   11 years ago

        Clearly nobody taught him not to rape and murder children.

  45. Mike M.   11 years ago

    Will the IRS's strategy of destroying evidence pay off? Maybe not.

    Department of Justice attorneys for the Internal Revenue Service told Judicial Watch on Friday that Lois Lerner's emails, indeed all government computer records, are backed up by the federal government in case of a government-wide catastrophe. The Obama administration attorneys said that this back-up system would be too onerous to search. The DOJ attorneys also acknowledged that the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) is investigating this back-up system.

    Funny how the vile scumbag Dave "Palin's Buttplug" Weigel doesn't have much to say lately about this "fake scandal".

    1. John   11 years ago

      I don't think the judge will find it "too onerous" for them to search. Those emails are going to be recovered and made public. My guess is sometime next summer. It will take about a year or so for the judge to terrorize them enough into producing them.

      When they come out and the truth that the whole thing was orchestrated by the White House becomes clear, the spin will be "Republicans disappointed in their quest to pin IRS actions on Obama", since they likely will never get an email directly from Obama telling the IRS to do this. There will be a lot of goal post moving.

      1. SugarFree   11 years ago

        Or they will fight the search order until November 9th, 2016, then let it come out and the Dems can switch over to screaming "Old scandal!"

        1. tarran   11 years ago

          If I managed to take over the body of Obama's successor in some freaky friday type occurance, I would have a lot of fun prosecuting the civil service and Obama's political appointees for the blatant violations of various laws. Do it right and the civil service would be terrified of stepping out of line for another thirty years. And the internecine war between the political and civil service proggies might sour them on each other for at least 5 years.

          1. John   11 years ago

            For the long term, it is more important to throw Lois Lerner and the civil service hacks in prison than it is the political hacks. Political hacks come and go and there will never be a shortage of political hacks willing to risk prison for the cause. Political people are difficult to deter. But civil servants can be deterred. Send Lerner and a few other people to prison for the rest of their lives and the next political hack who wants the civil servants to do their bidding won't have it so easy.

            1. tarran   11 years ago

              Oh yes... the civil service people to scare them from EVER doing that again, no matter how much they like the current admin and want to help them out.

              The politicals so that the whole thing is in the news...

    2. Agammamon   11 years ago

      indeed all government computer records, are backed up by the federal government in case of a government-wide catastrophe.

      . . . that this back-up system would be too onerous to search.

      So, what's the fucking point of a backup system intended to be used in the aftermath of a 'government-wide catastrophe' if ITS TOO FUCKING DIFFICULT TO SEARCH FOR RECORDS IN IT DURING NORMAL, NO CATASTROPHE, SITUATIONS?

      FFS, I've seen E-3's put more effort into their lies.

  46. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    PBS: bringing you the sort of thoughtful, unbiased news reporting you just cannot get anywhere else.

    In recent years, a number of American companies, as many as 22 since 2011, have relocated outside U.S. borders, usually through mergers with or purchases of a foreign company. One impact of changing their business addresses: They're no longer subject to U.S. corporate taxes. It's a process commonly known as a tax inversion.

    WRECKERS!

    HOARDERS!

    THEY"RE STEALING FROM THE GOVERNMENT!

    1. John   11 years ago

      There are over six billion people in the world who are NOT SUBJECT TO US INCOME TAXES. Did you know that?

      1. tarran   11 years ago

        John, I think we have solved the government's revenue problem. Clearly we must levy a tax on everyone on Earth!!!!

        1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

          What do you think this whole AGW movement is all about?

      2. Sevo   11 years ago

        John|8.27.14 @ 10:07AM|#
        "There are over six billion people in the world who are NOT SUBJECT TO US INCOME TAXES. Did you know that?"

        I'll bet they are, if you read enough of the IRS tax code.

    2. thom   11 years ago

      Don't foreign corporations still have to pay taxes on US income?

      1. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

        Any business that operates in the US has to pay US corporate taxes on US corporate income.

        Most tax regimes outside of the US do not tax US income.

        The US government taxes US corporations on their global income, not just their US income.

        1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

          If that money is re-patriated, though. If Apple (China), Corp. makes income in China, but leaves the money in Apple (China), Corp.'s bank account in China, the US gov't doesn't tax it, right?

          1. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

            True. Capital goes to where it is welcome, and the US has told global corporations that income earned abroad is not welcome in the US.

        2. thom   11 years ago

          That's what I thought. So the issue here is that people consider it unpatriotic that companies aren't paying income taxes on income that has nothing to do with this country.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      Allan Sloan wrote a long article on inversions in Fortune back in July. It was the same sort of tripe but with more politics. Since Sloan guest commentates on NPR, I'm surprised it's taken them this long to get on the bandwagon.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        You can find it here

        Sorry, but this year, July isn't going to work for me. That's because of a new kind of American corporate exceptionalism: companies that have decided to desert our country to avoid paying taxes but expect to keep receiving the full array of benefits that being American confers, and that everyone else is paying for.

        1. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

          What is "the full array of benefits" that Sloan refers to?

          Why would a global corporation want to contribute to the US warfare/welfare state?

          Why would a global corporation want to be tarnished as an arrogant American imperialist?

  47. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    ya think?

    Defense Lawyer Worried Murder Suspect Caius Veiovis' Horns, 666 Tattoo, May Sway Jury

    Veiovis considers himself a worshipper of Satan, and told police he was a vampire who drinks the blood of others along with his own, Mass Live reported.

    Along with a large septum piercing and the number 666 tattooed on his forehead, Veiovis also has body modifications in his head that resemble protruding horns. His lawyer, James G. Reardon Jr., told Mass Live he is worried his client's appearance might make prospective jurors prejudiced.

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      What you do to your body is a form of self-expression, so it does accurately reflect the person wearing the ink and the body mods.

      Sorry, but you have a dumbass for a client.

    2. tarran   11 years ago

      Maybe they could allow him to wear a burka?

    3. OldMexican   11 years ago

      His lawyer, James G. Reardon Jr., told Mass Live he is worried his client's appearance might make prospective jurors prejudiced.

      Maybe the lawyer is paving the way to a good plea deal...

  48. Sevo   11 years ago

    Only on pay-per-view. Lefty-on-Lefty fight night! All heavyweight action!
    Thrill as one brain-dead pummels another with slogans!
    "Tesla Gigafactory competition a 'race to the bottom?'"

    Laugh as Musk lies through his teeth!
    "Tesla CEO Elon Musk insists that he isn't trying to benefit his company at the expense of the states."

    Groan at the under-card!
    "The other groups to sign the letter are Arizona PIRG, the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, the Southwest Organizing Project (based in New Mexico), Texans for Public Justice and Good Jobs First."
    http://blog.sfgate.com/energy/.....hc-bustech

    1. OldMexican   11 years ago

      I don't know if there's a connection or not, but CNN is facing such hardships due to low ratings that is thinking of bribing employees to leave. I don't think leftism is that sexy anymore. Maybe we're indeed seeing the Age of Obama as the nadir of Progressivism.

  49. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    It's cool to be a libertarian ? whatever that means

    Libertarianism might be all the rage, but its adherents might not be as "libertarian" as you think.

    That's the premise of a very interesting new Pew Research Center piece, which notes that there are relatively few big differences between how those who call themselves libertarians and everybody else view the role of government regulation, foreign policy and personal liberty.

    Here are the most striking figures (while encouraging you to read the whole piece):

    1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

      That "study" seems like it might be more of a "fabrication". The graphs seem to have been created by a 4th grade student.

    2. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

      The findings are based on a "quiz" that supposedly identifies political orientation.

      However, the Pew Research Center's Political Typology Quiz is entirely bogus. Pew might try to be objective, and they probably believe that they really are, but they have progressive bias. The Quiz forces a libertarian to choose between 23 different false dichotomies. It's a really silly analysis of a poorly constructed study.

  50. Sevo   11 years ago

    It's all good!

    "Minimum wage bump would help close wealth gap for 23% in S.F."
    http://www.sfgate.com/default/.....714913.php

    And nobody loses! Reich tells him a certain price only went up $0.15 somewhere else and unicorns farted the rest of the money!

    1. Sevo   11 years ago

      Oh, and comments mostly sane, surprisingly. Writer isn't.

  51. Coeus   11 years ago

    5 Things You Need To Know About Interacting With Me, a Fat Girl Who Wears Revealing Clothes

    Since I enjoy wearing a lot of clothing that reveals my skin and shows off my body, like crop tops, short skirts and shorts, bikinis, leggings and tight dresses, I have to deal with a lot of backlash. Because god forbid a fat woman likes the way she looks and lets the world know it.

    2. Don't Stare. I'm a Person, Not Eye Candy.

    The most common reaction I get from others when I wear revealing clothing are stares. Some people will sort of roll their eyes or look disgusted; others will just stare as if I'm some kind of art exhibit at a museum. Either way, there are a lot of stares.

    Look, I understand that I'm challenging your views on fat womanhood and forcing you to question your beliefs and attitudes, but keep this contemplation to yourself. Yes, I do notice when you're looking. Yes, it does make me feel uncomfortable.

    I'm not some sort of object to be admired; I'm a human being first and foremost. Respect my right to choose to be fabulous and move it along.

    1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

      Not Eye Candy

      no shit.

    2. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      I'm not some sort of object to be admired

      Somehow, I don't think that's admiration.

    3. John   11 years ago

      What do you mean don't stare? It is human nature to stair at a car wreck no matter how hideous it is. You just can't help it.

      1. tarran   11 years ago

        I am struggling here and hope that someone can femsplain this to me.

        Is her thesis really that she likes to show off her body but doesn't like people looking?

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          It's hard to parse the "arguments" of the delusional. She's fine with positive comments (coming from other delusional people), but will brook no criticism.

          1. John   11 years ago

            Isn't this really "I just want the cute guys to look at me"? She totally wants a guy she is interested to notice her. The guys she doesn't like are supposed to magically know not to objectify her.

            1. trshmnster the terrible   11 years ago

              I'm shocked, shocked I say!

        2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

          Yes. That way she can express a grievance no matter which way it goes.

          Fat is one thing, stupid and vile is another.

        3. WTF   11 years ago

          Yes. She chooses to show off her (disgusting fat)body, but is horrified that anyone might actually look at it.

      2. Rhywun   11 years ago

        I thought the whole point of wearing revealing clothing was to attract attention? Wut do I know.

    4. trshmnster the terrible   11 years ago

      Because god forbid a fat woman likes the way she looks and lets the world know it.

      Hunter, it's great that you've found out that you like bon-bons better than sit ups, but the rest of the world doesn't want to know. Back before "fat shaming" was put in the same category as bigotry, folks would call you trailer trash. I guess the equivalent today is "body positive feminist" or some similar bullshit.

      1. trshmnster the terrible   11 years ago

        Honey*

    5. RBS   11 years ago

      Look, I understand that I'm challenging your views on fat womanhood and forcing you to question your beliefs and attitudes

      Fat, stupid and delusional.

      1. Whahappan?   11 years ago

        ...is no way to go through life

    6. OldMexican   11 years ago

      Some people will sort of roll their eyes or look disgusted; others will just stare as if I'm some kind of art exhibit at a museum. Either way, there are a lot of stares.

      So much for asking people not to regard you as "eye candy." They clearly don't, as you concede.

      I'm not some sort of object to be admired; I'm a human being first and foremost.

      I don't understand. Do you mean humans do not deserve admiration? Or that being admired is the antithesis of being human? I don't get it.

    7. Steve G   11 years ago

      "I enjoy...show(ing) off my body" But... "Don't Stare" it 'makes me feel uncomfortable' So let me get this right you dress specifically to be on display, but you don't want to be on display, is that about right?
      Assclown. You are getting exactly what you wanted

  52. DEG   11 years ago

    Did this get posted at all? It's a little old.

    Department of Justice sues the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) because the PSP uses the same physical fitness standards for men and women. The reason is having the same standards for men and women is discriminatory against women.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      Wait, I thought having different standards was discriminatory

    2. John   11 years ago

      Gender is a social construct, except when its not.

    3. Coeus   11 years ago

      Silly. Biology only matters when it comes to child support arguments.

      Thus spake feminist Zeus.

  53. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Is her thesis really that she likes to show off her body but doesn't like people looking?

    She just doesn't want the *wrong* people looking.

  54. OldMexican   11 years ago

    "The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress."

    And I am sure the other nations will take this agreement very seriously even if the U.S. Congress doesn't ratify it, meaning that once Obama's term is over, Congress will happily disavow it. Am I right?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Freedom Lovers Can Reckon with Addicts and Addiction

Daniel Akst | 6.15.2025 7:00 AM

Ross Douthat on Digital Alienation, Birth Rates, and Demographic Collapse

Liz Wolfe and Zach Weissmueller | From the July 2025 issue

More Than 1,800 'No Kings' Protests Aim for Nonviolent Pushback Against Trump Policies

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.14.2025 10:10 AM

Have Presidents Grown Too Powerful To Be Removed From Office?

Gene Healy | 6.14.2025 8:00 AM

Some Federal Agencies Are Actually Getting More Efficient

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.14.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!