Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

School District Bans Talking About Ferguson

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 8.22.2014 1:45 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Wikimedia Commons
(Wikimedia Commons)
auvet/Flickr

Google Maps tells me that Edwardsville, Illinois, is just a 33-minute drive from Ferguson, Missouri. It seems natural that Edwardsville students might want to talk about the events drawing national attention so close to their own homes—but they best not do it at school. As of Wednesday, talking about the Michael Brown shooting and surrounding events is prohibited in Edwardsville classrooms. 

Superintendant Ed Hightower told CBS St. Louis that normally he encourages open discussion, but there are just too many "facts that are unknown" in this case. So Edwardsville middle- and high-school teachers were instructed this week not to broach the subject themselves and "change the subject and refocus" if students brought it up. 

On Thursday, a memo went out to parents explaining the superintendent's decision. Via the Edwardsville School District 7 Parents Facebook page: 

Subject: Discussion of the Ferguson/Florissant Incident

On Friday, August 15, 2014, and Monday, August 18, 2014, Dennis Cramsey, EHS Principal, and I were inundated with calls from parents complaining that some EHS teachers were biased and injecting their own opinion regarding the shooting of Michael Brown, an 18 year-old African American student, by a Caucasian police officer in the Ferguson/Florissant community. The general consensus of parents who called was that if the administration did not get a handle on this situation, there might be violence among students occurring at EHS.

As Superintendent, I will take full responsibility for not preparing administrators and staff members how to deal with this volatile situation. As a result, on Monday afternoon, the decision was made to cease discussion of the event because of the tension, emotion, and anger surrounding the Ferguson/Florissant events.

It was not our intent to ignore the educational relevance of these events. However, we felt it was important to take the time to calm a potential situation at the high school and to prepare administrators and teachers to approach this critical issue in an objective, fact-based manner. Everyone has an opinion - the sharing of which can be polarizing. Far too many facts remain unknown, and without these facts, none of us is in the best position to moderate between opposing views.

The memo continues by noting that the district is developing "a framework" for teachers to follow when discussing the issue that will ensure "a safe and orderly environment" is maintained. As soon as this framework is completed—which the district expects to happen sometime during the week of August 25—Edwardsville school district will return to "its commitment toward diversity, positive race relationships, due process, and social justice," it assures parents. 

Some parents on Facebook were supportive of the Superintendent's decision. "As a parent, I am already having these conversations with my child at home where I feel they should be discussed," wrote Nick Pieri. "I am not sure I feel comfortable with teachers, or a politician for that matter, speaking with my child about this topic without knowing ahead of time what will be discussed."

But others were dismayed by what they saw as an overreaction by the school district. Some suggested that the superintendent could have simply instructed teachers to cool it on the personal opinions, rather than shut down conversation entirely. "While I respect that individual teachers' opinions should not be part of the classroom discourse about any topic," wrote Mandi Cygne, who has three children in Edwardsville schools, "I feel that by effectively censoring current events out of our schools, you are doing a grave mis-service to our student population in District 7, including my own children." 

"As a District 7 parent, I expect the professionals who teach my son to make good use of opportunities to engage students in critical thinking, particularly when the subject matter is an urgent and timely one," wrote Steve Moiles. "I also expect that District 7 administrators will not prohibit faculty from engaging in meaningful discussions of significant current events when students offer their own observations or ask questions." 

I called the Edwardsville School District Friday morning for confirmation and commentary; alas, only the superintendent himself can say anything, I'm told, and he's apparently in meetings "all day." 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ronald Bailey on How Fear of Disorder Motivates Environmentalists

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

CultureMichael BrownEducationMissouriIllinoisMichael Brown
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (56)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Episiarch   11 years ago

    Yes, let's prohibit discussion so that people are never exposed to others with different viewpoints and ideas, thereby further polarizing people and reinforcing TEAM behavior. Oh wait, that works beautifully for reinforcing the state and the power of politicians and bureaucrats, so carry on.

    1. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

      He who questions training only trains himself in asking questions.

      1. Episiarch   11 years ago

        That movie was such a disappointment. Much like you, Hugh.

        1. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

          I'm surprised to see you here, Epi. What with this being payday I figured you'd be out looking for a hooker with IBS to give you a Seattle Mudslide.

          1. Episiarch   11 years ago

            I still have plenty of time for that!

            1. Obama's Buttplug   11 years ago

              Come to Minneapolis and hire the hooker who was on the 5-bus this morning. White, "blonde", somewhat plump, breasts spilling out of her hooker-sundress, clearly on an opiate, getting the nods and pretty much rolling around in her seat.

              1. Homple   11 years ago

                That looks like the Ghetto-Mall of America route. I would expect a vibrant ridership.

      2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Chuin would give you a frontal lobotomy without breaking your skin for such impertinence.

  2. Paul.   11 years ago

    As of Wednesday, talking about the Michael Brown shooting and surrounding events is prohibited in Edwardsville classrooms.

    Say what you will, the kids are getting an education.

    1. Episiarch   11 years ago

      "Today's lesson, children, is: fuck you that's why. This is part of our broader curriculum of No, Really, Fuck You."

  3. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

    I called the Edwardsville School District Friday morning for confirmation and commentary; alas, only the superintendent himself can say anything, I'm told, and he's apparently in meetings "all day."

    That seems like a pretty poorly designed system. I mean, if only one guy is able to speak for the district and he can be tied up in meetings for an entire day, then how is the district supposed to provide timely and honest answers about their policies to the publ--ohhhhhh.

  4. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

    First NIU, now Edwardsville - I am so proud of my state, making it into the pages of.....wait a minute?!

  5. Jordan   11 years ago

    "As a District 7 parent, I expect the professionals who teach my son to make good use of opportunities to engage students in critical thinking, particularly when the subject matter is an urgent and timely one," wrote Steve Moiles. "I also expect that District 7 administrators will not prohibit faculty from engaging in meaningful discussions of significant current events when students offer their own observations or ask questions."

    Oh, you poor naive soul.

  6. Warty   11 years ago

    Although I, uh, hate to judge before all the facts are in, it's beginning to look like, uh, Superintendant Hightower exceeded his authority.

  7. Florida Man   11 years ago

    "As a District 7 parent, I expect the professionals who teach my son to make good use of opportunities to engage students in critical thinking, particularly when the subject matter is an urgent and timely one," wrote Steve Moiles. "I also expect that District 7 administrators will not prohibit faculty from engaging in meaningful discussions of significant current events when students offer their own observations or ask questions."

    District 7? That the one with coal miners? Coming soon children fighting each other to death to preserve peace and order.

    1. Almanian!   11 years ago

      "Fuckin' prawns....."

      No, wait....

    2. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

      Just be glad your kid doesn't have to go to District 9 with all the baby lobster aliens.

      1. Florida Man   11 years ago

        +1/2 eaten can of cat food.

  8. Almanian!   11 years ago

    Proud Illinois is getting its high school students prepared for Orwellian University.

    Keep it all in the "Show Me Nothing" state! Roll Illini!

  9. GILMORE   11 years ago

    "n, the decision was made to cease discussion of the event because of the tension, emotion, and anger surrounding the Ferguson/Florissant events."

    The hubris and insanity here....

    ...is that bureaucrats have either the *right* to tell other people what they can and cannot discuss, or the ability to *enforce* that decision in any case.

    What, will they suspend students who talk about certain things between classes?

    This CONTROL AT ALL COSTS mentality is absurd and needs to be discarded.

    1. GILMORE   11 years ago

      and yes, i know this is actually very much like the situation of the kid who 'said something about a gun' in his dinosaur-story, and subseqently triggered the Police State Interrogation/Punishment system on himself for daring to suggest they were 'over-reacting'.

      1. croaker   11 years ago

        No to mention the student that was suspended for saying "bless you" when another student sneezed.

  10. Mainer2   11 years ago

    Just don't talk about the war. I mentioned it once, but I think I got away with it alright.

    1. Trouser-Pod   11 years ago

      +2 egg mayonnaise,
      +1 prawn Goebbels,
      +1 Hermann Goering,
      and +4 Colditz salads

      1. WTF   11 years ago

        Is there something wrong?

        Will you stop talking about the war?

        Me? You started it.

        We did not!

        Yes, you did. You invaded Poland.

        1. Trouser-Pod   11 years ago

          +1 Japanese Canadian moose

        2. Bardas Phocas   11 years ago

          Stop talking about the Race War!

  11. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

    commitment toward diversity, positive race relationships, due process, and social justice

    So this subject isn't a valid topic for someone with those goals? I guess not if the reality is that they are null-value bullshit phrases that serve only as a useful vehicle for for the true commitment to Obey and Control.

  12. Rusty 5hackleford   11 years ago

    Egh.. not as bad as this idiot "teacher"

    "Alabama teacher accused of telling students to reenact Michael Brown shooting

    Sixth-grade Selma teacher placed on leave for having pupils recreate the racially charged Missouri gun death. She has African-American students play Brown's part and white children portray cops"

    http://www.nydailynews.com/new.....-1.1910883

    1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

      I imagine that she will be called before the grand jury due to her amazing understanding of the particulars of the incident?

    2. WTF   11 years ago

      So, I guess she somehow knows exactly how it happened with enough certainty that she can have kids reenact it. Does everyone know this valuable eye witness is available?

      1. creech   11 years ago

        How many bullshit recreations of the Pilgrims' Thanksgiving have you sat through or been forced to participate in? Any one of us can look back and see the non-stop propaganda we were fed in school.

        1. Mainer2   11 years ago

          I was honestly surprised to find out things like Marconi developed radio, or that the Germans had the lead in chemistry before WW2. I was under the impression that everything and anything of any consequence had been invented in America, and we were the best at it.

  13. Stickler Meeseeks   11 years ago

    I was teaching middle school age students during the Zimmerman fiasco. Our administrators encouraged us to speak to our kids about the incident. Now, I am white, whereas the student body is about 50+% black. There were a few teachers, mostly black, who took this as an opportunity to blame racist Amerikkka. Others, including myself, talked about the legal system, presented all of the evidence that was available, and encouraged students to ask questions and to wait for more information to be made known, if answers were not readily available. It went quite well. And students, even black kids raised around the "blame whitey" mentality, are pretty savvy. You just have to know the case and be prepared to explain this complex incident in terms that kids this age can grasp.

    1. Rusty 5hackleford   11 years ago

      Thats why I think the police officer, if he stands trial, will be found not guilty.

      It's not that I think he is innocent, but his story is plausible and the evidence for Mike Brown is questionable, especially the eyewitnesses.

      1. Stickler Meeseeks   11 years ago

        The two things that I kept emphasizing with them was 1) what theory does the evidence support; 2) avoid using emotions and assumptions to jump to conclusions. These were good lessons and the kids still remember them.

      2. Stickler Meeseeks   11 years ago

        The two things that I kept emphasizing with them was 1) what theory does the evidence support; 2) avoid using emotions and assumptions to jump to conclusions. These were good lessons and the kids still remember them.

        1. Stickler Meeseeks   11 years ago

          Repetition is the mother of memory. Another good lesson.

    2. KPres   11 years ago

      "Others, including myself, talked about the legal system, presented all of the evidence that was available, and encouraged students to ask questions and to wait for more information to be made known, if answers were not readily available."

      Clearly, you're a racist.

  14. WTF   11 years ago

    This far in and no Fight Club jokes?
    I am disappoint.

    1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

      The First Rule of Fight Club Jokes..

  15. Mainer2   11 years ago

    I went to a small grade school. In 5th grade (1968), the 8th graders came to our class room an hour a day for "Current Events" with our teacher (the cool young male teacher).

    So we were exposed to very spirited debates about the Viet Nam war. Viet fucking Nam being argued in front of 10 year olds. Can you imagine the horror.

    1. ernieyeball   11 years ago

      Truly the good old days. Few and far between.

  16. John   11 years ago

    As school craziness goes, this is pretty far down the list. It is not irrational. Kids go to school to learn the subjects taught not to discuss current events. Think of it this way, imagine you are teaching a math class and Tony and Shreek are two of your students. Every time you try to teach that day's lesson on solving two variable equation Tony and Shreek get into an argument with the other students about Ferguson. Wouldn't you at some point just tell everyone to shut the fuck up about Ferguson so we could get back to what we are here to do?

    That is pretty much what the school is doing here. It is a bit extreme but I could imagine circumstances where it would be justified.

    1. Mainer2   11 years ago

      Point taken. If math class is getting derailed because of Ferguson, it would be proper (and relatively simple) to say STFU about Ferguson.

      Then there's this "Far too many facts remain unknown, and without these facts, none of us is in the best position to moderate between opposing views.." Assuming the subject is appropriate to the class, you can moderate a discussion even if certain facts are in dispute. But I read that as, don't talk about Ferguson until we've got our marching orders on what to tell you to think about it.

      Maybe I'm just cynical.

      1. Homple   11 years ago

        "f math class is getting derailed because of Ferguson, it would be proper (and relatively simple) to say STFU about Ferguson."

        Agreed, and it's enough for the math teacher to say that without a diktat from the principal.

    2. DEATFBIRSECIA   11 years ago

      "Wouldn't you at some point just tell everyone to shut the fuck up about Ferguson so we could get back to what we are here to do?"

      No. You'd tell Tony and Shreek to shut up, and when they didn't you'd send them to the principal's office.

      Where he could, of course, have the sheriff come in and arrest them.

      1. Mainer2   11 years ago

        +1 Police State

    3. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

      Think of it this way, imagine you are teaching a math class and Tony and Shreek are two of your students.

      1. Tony leaves Oklahoma at 2:00 on an eastbound train for Atlanta traveling 88 km/h. Weigel leaves Atlanta at 12:30 on a westbound train for Oklahoma traveling 79 km/h. How long will it take before the trains collide, and how awesome would that be?

  17. Obama's Buttplug   11 years ago

    School District Bans Talking About Ferguson

    If only Reason would follow suit.

    1. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

      Does anyone named Lucy live in Ferguson?

  18. blcartwright   11 years ago

    sounds reasonable. opinions in the absence of evidence = bullshit

  19. userve32   11 years ago

    Lets jsut roll with the punches dude.

    http://www.AnonCrypt.tk

  20. avocats   11 years ago

    Seems like the best "critical thinking" is done when there is some consensus on the facts. While I abhor the delay by the police and their overlords in releasing information about this case, I question the point of discussing this particular case until the facts are known.

    For example, if discussed during week one, the class would have been talking about a good young man about to start college. Week two we had a video that shows pretty convincingly that he was a tall, hefty, strongarm robber, and was due to start refrigerator repair school. Week three we have a video with community witnesses describing the situation pretty much the same as the unofficial police reports.

    None of this justifies the shooting anyone, but all of these "ambient" details color the discussion and the conclusions.

    So, yes, I'd have teachers tell the kids to wait until some facts were established.

    And I'd never want public school teachers sharing their personal opinions. Not the public school teachers I've met. Kids take a lot of what teachers say as gospel.

  21. optimusratiostultum   11 years ago

    This is a very misleading headline, in fact an outright lie. No child was banned from saying anything about it, kids don't get detention for asking questions about it.

    Teachers were merely instructed to focus on the curriculum instead of spouting their opinion on an affair which is still entirely unresolved. I would compare teachers discussing the events in Ferguson now, to teachers suddenly lecturing on Islam on sept 12 just becuase it was a current event.

    There is a time and place for such discussions in schools and that requires the correct forum (a pertinet, class of which there are not many in high school) an informed teacher (no one is truly informed right now) and a curriculum based on teaching how to reason about the situation rather than what to think about the situation (the school actually claimed to be working on a curriculum). For teachers to approach any subject without those things is I think irresponsible.

  22. KPres   11 years ago

    Wouldn't it be great if there was some way where you could have a choice of where you sent you kids to, so that if they ended up talking about things like this, and you didn't want them to, you could send them to a different school, and vice versa?

    But, of course, we can't have that because OMG, religion!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!