Meet the Politician Who Thinks a Wrongfully Convicted Man Was 'Lucky' to Get Out After 11 Years
"Travesty of justice"


The Arkansas Project's Nic Horton has an update on last week's story about Gyronne Buckley, a man denied compensation by the state legislature even though he was wrongfully convicted and incarcerated for 11 years.
Horton interview state Sen. Jeremy Hutchinson (R), who heads the Judiciary Committee and voted to deny Buckley's compensation. Horton comes away unpersuaded by Hutchinson's explanation. Here is a snippet, with Hutchinson's comments in Italics and Horton's in plain text:
When special prosecutor Larry Jegley chose not to retry Buckley, Hutchinson said:
…the state did him a favor by not putting him or the taxpayers through that and released him. And, uh, his conviction was expunged, and that — I know eleven years is a long time, but if you look at it from his perspective, if he truly is innocent, that's a travesty of justice. If you look at it from a prosecutor's side, the guy's guilty and he only served a third of his sentence. That could also be called a travesty of justice.
I hope that Hutchinson is wrong. Do prosecutors actually believe that those who receive trials which are so unfair that their sentences are overturned should really be in prison anyway? Is there any prosecutor who believes that escaping from a thirty-year sentence based on an unfair trial is a travesty of justice?
Hutchinson expanded on this logic:
Mr. Buckley could've seen another 20 years if Jegley had taken him back to trial. Jegley chose not to and said 'I think justice has been done and we're going to –' instead of jumping for joy and being happy, he turns around and sues the state.
I don't want to put words in Hutchinson's mouth, but I think he's arguing here that if Buckley had a more sophisticated understanding of the criminal justice system, he'd be grateful that he got off easy with an unfair trial and the 11 years behind bars that came with it.
Read the full interview here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If you look at it from a prosecutor's side, the guy's guilty and he only served a third of his sentence.
Uh, no. The guy may be convicted, but that doesn't mean he's guilty. This case points up the difference between the two.
I remember when prosecutors were supposed to care about whether they were actually sending the right guy to prison . . . .
I remember when prosecutors were supposed to care about whether they were actually sending the right guy to prison
You must be older than dirt.
I remember when prosecutors were supposed to care about whether they were actually sending the right guy to prison . . . .
You can't be 2000 years old!
Cheater!
MegaloMonocle is old.
It's bad enough that it's Monday, Reason. Could you just post one story today that doesn't involve you winding up and kicking me in the nuts? Please?
Look! A puppy and a baby!
http://www.buzzfeed.com/larapa.....ts-the-cut
D'awwww.
What, no fuzzy kittens? Why do you hate the kittens?
If you look at it from a prosecutor's side-
Why the hell would I do that?
Think of the poor mosquito. She needs your blood to live. Sure you might get malaria, but think of her children. Try looking at it from her side. Why do you hate the mosquito children?
I just aborted a bunch of mosquito children last night.
A cooler of beer and a bug zapper? No wait that was my Sunday night.
If you look at it from a prosecutor's side,
"I'd rather put a 100 innocent people behind bars than see one guilty man go unconvicted!"
Gyronne
WTF!? I can'f focus on this story, that's a really weird name!
Just kidding... just kidding!
*narrows gaze*
Somebody had to say it.
Really, that was the dumbest fight I have ever seen. I guess I can add weird names to the do not talk about list of circumcision, pizza, abortion, etc.
And never, ever say anything bad about Hummus. It's delicious, that is all. You've been warned.
I love chick peas. That is all I will say about that.
Related though...what's with folks with "ethnic" names facing and/or serving 11 years in prison?
That's weird.
It's Reason's monthly 'weird name 11 year prison sentence nut punch' day.
Duh, I thought everyone knew that! It's the 11th after all!
You just blew my mind. Do we have a resident numerologist? That's a thing right?
The Book of Revelation foretold this.
But Cincinatti's a cool place to live...
if you can tolerate what passes for chili.
Hey man, Skyline is the bomb.
NO...
Just, NO!
Gut-Bomb.
Gold Star chili is what got me started on Chili. My chili is loosely based on one of theirs, but it's better. Well, it's the best chili in da murl.
We real Ohioans know that Cincy is really part of Kentucky. Fuck Cincinnati.
Kentucky should be really happy if that's the only Ohio city they have to take ownership of. I mean, they could get Akron, Akron ... the horror...
Yeah, yeah, and Toledo is really Michigan.
Ohio, do you really want to hang your hat on Cleveland?
And dont even bring up Columbus [eyeroll].
Next you will explain to us about the "attractive investment opportunities in Zimbabwe"
Racist!
Don't forget about Johnny Cueto being the bestest, though Pittsburgh fans find his name funny.
instead of jumping for joy and being happy, he turns around and sues the state.
So by that logic, if a cop breaks down my door, shoots my dogs, throws a grenade into my babies crib and burns her up, and then tazes my granny to death, then says 'Ooops, wrong house', I should jump for joy and be happy because they didn't just kill everyone in the house?
Fuck this guy and the horse he rode in on, and his mum too.
Sen. Hutchison, by the way, is a bit of an asshole, and he likes to play cop, which might explain his idiocy here.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new.....-1.1440705
Only a bit?
Call him a bit of an asshole is a bit of an epic understatement.
Arkansas: Making Alabama Seem Like a Haven for Cosmopolitan Intellectuals Since 1836
Just wait until the guy gets the bill for 11 years of room and board.
While you've got to hate the position, the consequence would be a hefty tax bill to John Q Taxpayer.
I get that the "fair and timely trial" by a "jury of ones peers" is a better than average system, but to be so snotty and sanctimonious is a bit too much to take.
Wonder what this asshole thinks of them letting the West Memphis 3 go?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Memphis_Three
18 years is a long time to rot in jail.
Over the mountain and through the woods oh yeah.
http://www.AnonGalaxy.tk
"I hope that Hutchinson is wrong. Do prosecutors actually believe that those who receive trials which are so unfair that their sentences are overturned should really be in prison anyway?"
Was Buckley's conviction overturned because he was not guilty or because the trial was tainted? If the latter, the prosecutor believing Buckley is actually guilty is not unreasonable.
"Mr. Buckley could've seen another 20 years if Jegley had taken him back to trial. Jegley chose not to and said 'I think justice has been done and we're going to ?' instead of jumping for joy and being happy, he turns around and sues the state."
That would be a reasonable reaction by Buckley if he was guilty. If he is innocent then being righteously furious about having eleven years of his life wasted is a perfectly reasonable reaction as well.