Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Barack Obama

Barack Obama Attached Himself to Premiere of Cosmos, Says Neil de Grasse Tyson

Ed Krayewski | 6.11.2014 4:42 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Twitter
(Twitter)
a more enthusiastic consent
Twitter

Earlier this year President Obama introduced the first episode of Cosmos, a Fox sequel/remake of the 1980 Carl Sagan PBS mini-series of the same name, hosted by astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson.

Whose idea was it to get the president involved? Tyson explains in an interview at Grantland's Hollywood Prospectus:

What was the process of getting Obama to introduce the show in the first episode?

That was their choice. We didn't ask them. We didn't have anything to say about it. They asked us, "Do you mind if we intro your show?" Can't say no to the president. So he did. He may have been riding the very high media attention that Cosmos had been getting on the ramp-up. Because it was airing in prime time on a network —

It was a good look for him.

Right. Because it was airing in prime time on a network, reporters that normally covered television entertainment and not television documentaries were tasked with covering Cosmos. It was on their beat, the Fox lineup on a Sunday night. So the media attention ended up reaching not only the traditional people that would talk about a documentary, but entertainment reporters. The geek blogosphere was abuzz, and also people who were curious, fans of the original series, and were curious what would happen for it being on Fox. What does it mean that Seth MacFarlane, who's best known for his fart jokes — what does it mean that he's executive producing? There were a lot of people who had some anxieties about that and were eager to learn what would unfold.

That same week, by the way, Obama — the White House — released its budget, which included a reduction in the science spending in NASA. So if you look at it politically, rather than gesturally, it's easy to think of that as a way for him to try to gain points back in the science community, immediately after dropping the science budget for NASA.

Can't say no to the president, even when he's injecting himself into something to score political points. A pro-tip for Tyson: Yes, you can. I imagine it'll become easier for many celebrities to say no when a Republican takes the White House again.

Via the Twitter feed of Instapundit

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: De Blasio Is Busting Just As Many Pot Smokers As Bloomberg Did

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Barack ObamaTelevisionPopular Culture
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (47)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Sevo   11 years ago

    PHOTO OP!

  2. tonguesandelbows   11 years ago

    "nice documentary series you have there. Be a shame if something happened to it..."

  3. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

    Droit du seigneur is a helluva drug.

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      The thing is, historically, that's a myth. Yet today, not as much.

  4. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

    I grow increasingly disappointed in Tyson, who I liked when he first got into the science popularization business. He's falling into the political trap.

    My advice to scientists who are serious about science--avoid politics. It's like using the Ring.

    1. Monkey's Uncle   11 years ago

      ^^^THIS^^^
      Tyson, Nye, Dawkins and many others whom I admire(d) for their skepticism and disagree with their statism.

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Just imagine applying the same skepticism you're supposed to use in the practice of science to politics.

        1. Monkey's Uncle   11 years ago

          I think you just found the missing best line to Lennon's song!

      2. Corning   11 years ago

        Dawkins?

        I know he is sort of a dick when it comes to his atheism...but i have not heard him really talk about politics.

        You got any examples?

        1. Monkey's Uncle   11 years ago

          Not right offhand, but I do recall him being very pro Government funded education in a few of the things I have heard and read.

          1. Corning   11 years ago

            Well yeah. I mean as a libertarian i don't like it and a voucher system moving to full private would be nice...but in the US and Europe government paying for K-12 eduction is a pretty centrist position. And government funding of K-12 was baked into the states well before FDR and Wilson and the statist progressives took over.

            Maybe you are talking about College. IDK.

          2. Knarf the Yenrabian   11 years ago

            Like most everyone else, Dawkins doesn't think like an economist and can't imagine how widespread education would exist without state sponsorship.

            Given how marginalized market types are in the public sphere, that's to be expected even among brilliant writers who understand emergent, unplanned biological order even if they don't recognize emergent social order.

        2. Jesus H. Christ   11 years ago

          I've heard him say he is a political liberal. He definitely is on the left when it comes to politics.

          1. Monkey's Uncle   11 years ago

            Jesus H. Christ commenting on Dawkins. I LOLed.

        3. nrob   11 years ago

          He states in one of his documentaries that he wishes a socialist state, not verbatim but he does say i'd prefer socialism.

    2. BigT   11 years ago

      Can't say I didn't warn you. Dyson is a leftist, statist stooge. His science has decayed with each episode.

      Sagan must be turning over in his grave.

      ... Oh wait, his widow helped write this damned thing.

      1. Christophe   11 years ago

        Sagan also popularized nuclear winter fears, and relied on a lot of bullshit in doing so.

      2. Ed   11 years ago

        Dyson is awesome

    3. mad.casual   11 years ago

      I grow increasingly disappointed in Tyson, who I liked when he first got into the science popularization business.

      I never liked Tyson. Mainly because I can remember a 'pro-intellectualism' Obama.

    4. datcv   11 years ago

      The funny thing about his show is that he constantly show where scientists in the minority have to fight for their ideas before they are accepted.

      And then covers global warming as if no one can question it. CONSENSUS!

  5. Jordan   11 years ago

    One douche got out-douched by another douche.

  6. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

    Can't say no to the president, even when he's injecting himself into something to score political points. A pro-tip for Tyson: Yes, you can.

    Seriously. Last time I checked, I missed the "kiss the ring" clause in Article II.

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      It's that or get audited like a Republican.

    2. croaker   11 years ago

      It's the unwritten part of USAPATRIOT.

      And it's "kiss the ass".

    3. Mickey Rat   11 years ago

      You can say no to the President in something like this, if you really want to. They did not really want to.

  7. Ronny Paulino   11 years ago

    Reminds me of when Michelle Obama presented the Best Picture Oscar a couple years ago. THE F*CK does she have to do with the movie industry?

    1. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

      She was in Star Wars Episodes III, IV, V, and VI.

      1. Specail Sauce   11 years ago

        +1 Wookie

  8. Sunken Idaho   11 years ago

    I wonder if Bill Nye can explain the science behind becoming an administration flunky for massive government intervention?

    1. Corning   11 years ago

      Neil deGrasse Tyson is one as well when it comes to space exploration.

      When Virgin and other private space companies were big in the news he bitched and moaned about them stealing NASA's thunder....and funding.

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Yes, he really pissed me off with that nonsense. Really, dude? Don't you want humans in space? Because it certainly is not happening anytime soon through government action.

        NASA has been sending men to space for over 50 years. And they've sent humans outside of LEO around nine times, the last time being 42 years ago. Holy shit is that a bad record.

  9. Corning   11 years ago

    The Big Bang is bullshit.

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      Well, maybe, but it has more supporting evidence than the next bullshit theory, don't you think?

      1. Corning   11 years ago

        but it has more supporting evidence

        It also has exclusionary evidence that proves it wrong.

        The Big Bang is a positive not a matter of faith. A positive hypothesis can be proven wrong without replacing it.

        The least wrong theory is still wrong. And why isn't "we don't fucking know" on that hypothetical list of yours?

        Shit load more evidence in that box then the Big Bang.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Well, Newtonian gravity was wrong in the sense that it was incomplete.

        2. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

          It also has exclusionary evidence that proves it wrong.

          Yeah, if Yggdrasil doesn't hold up the worlds, what prevents them from falling into the Ginnungagap?

          Norse Faith 1 - Atheists 0

    2. Specail Sauce   11 years ago

      Yes, but it's better than Two and a Half Men.

      1. Corning   11 years ago

        Not what i mean..

        But yeah that show is bullshit. No way super smart dudes who look like the dudes on the show would have all that much trouble with women.

        The Woman is attractive I guess but come on...there are plenty of attractive women who are not full on idiot losers like she is.

        Also wouldn't they be rich? as in not all living together cuz they have piles of money?

  10. Paul.   11 years ago

    Not sure what the surprise is here. This is the twitter presidency.

    And who can knock the success of it? Two terms, bitches, two terms. And Hillary/Biden's looking strong.

    And who's the college-degree'd guy doing the comments? I wanna see him in my office.

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      Two terms. Two terms like. . .George W. Bush?

    2. jmomls   11 years ago

      *And Hillary/Biden's looking strong.*

      Snort. Right.

      Hill's going to be torpedoed by Benghazi and Biden is one spoon drop away from having no Froot Loops left.

  11. Rev-Match   11 years ago

    Can't say no to the president.

    Watch me.

    1. croaker   11 years ago

      I'll watch you.

      I'll watch you get raped analy by the IRS, NSA, FBI and any other agency that want a piece of Uranus.

  12. Jesus H. Christ   11 years ago

    I didn't see every new Cosmos episode but I did catch the global warming one. Yes, I was annoyed, but there was a scene where Tyson was standing on the bridge of the spaceship of the imagination, or whatever they call it, and it was right over an erupting Mt. Aetna. What a stunning visual. it was beautifully done, and on my big flat screen, it made for a spectacular scene. There are more than a few production high points on the series, including the intro.

    Despite what I may consider his personal failings, Tyson is a pleasant and engaging host, and I enjoyed a lot of the series.

    1. datcv   11 years ago

      Definitely agree. He is a very good teacher and storyteller.

  13. jmomls   11 years ago

    These three look like utter lunatics. Bill Nye looks like a Batman villain circa 1966. Adam West is gonna burst into that room any minute.

  14. nrob   11 years ago

    Correction: "can't say no to the [Democrat] president." In a sense he's right even when his own party says no Obama weasels his way into forcing the outcome of a yes .

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Texans Gain the Right To Try Individualized Medical Treatments

J.D. Tuccille | 6.6.2025 7:00 AM

Review: There Are No Top-Down Solutions to the Problems Depicted in Adolescence

Autumn Billings | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!