Andrew Napolitano on Another Week of Government Lawlessness

The Constitution declares that if the government wants to take life, liberty, or property from anyone, it must seek what it wants by means of the courts and not by means of drones. The same lawyer who advised the president that he could kill with drones—even kill Americans if he wished—has now been nominated (with preliminary Senate approval) to become a federal judge.
This lawyer claims that he can be faithful to the Constitution and to presidential extra-judicial killing at the same time. But such a dual loyalty is metaphysically impossible, writes Andrew Napolitano, because the Constitution mandates the rule of law and presidential killing mandates the rule of men.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?