Reason Debate: Should Vaccines Be Mandatory?

Few issues divide libertarians so emphatically as government-mandated vaccinations against communicable diseases, as Reason discovered after including anti-vaccine activist Jenny McCarthy in our "45 Enemies of Freedom" list (August/September 2013). That selection brought forth a deluge of mail, such as this succinct riposte from reader Christopher Kent: "Freedom doesn't get much more personal than the right of individuals to choose what is put into their bodies, and to accept or reject medical procedures." But what happens when one person's individual choice leads to the otherwise preventable infection of another person who chooses differently?
So what is the proper role for government, and the citizenry, in the vaccination of children? The lines are hard to draw; all the more reason to have a Reason debate. To that end, Ronald Bailey, Jeffrey Singer, and Sandy Reider take the scalpel to each others' arguments, in the hope of bringing more practical and philosophical clarity to a divisive topic.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?