Actor Liam Neeson Wrangles With de Blasio Over Horse-Drawn Carriages, Sticks Up for Drivers Who Would Lose Jobs


Liam Neeson is best known for fighting Nazis and Sith and sex traffickers, but the action hero's latest foe is of a decidedly more mundane variety. Neeson is currently battling New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio over the mayor's proposed ban on horse-drawn carriages in NYC. Over the weekend, Neeson escorted more than a dozen City Council members on a tour of a Manhattan horse stable.
He had invited de Blasio along, too, but the mayor declined. "He should have manned up and come," said Neeson.
Upon taking office in January 2014, de Blasio announced that one of his top priorities was "to quickly and aggressively" eradicate horse-drawn carriages from the New York City landscape. The mayor said he would replace the "inhumane" option with "electric, vintage-replica tourist-friendly vehicles."
"That's exactly what New York needs, more cars," scoffed Neeson on Sunday's stable tour. "This experiment has been tried with electric cars in San Francisco: Failed, abysmally."
As New York magazine points out, "there is no shortage of celebrity animal-rights activists who support Mayor de Blasio's plan," but Neeson is one of the first celebrities to side with "the 300 plus drivers and stable workers who may be put out of work by the ban." On the tour, Neeson and company met with both carriage drivers and animal caretakers to see how horses were "well cared for."
Neeson also suggested that something other than animal welfare might be motivating de Blasio and others who support doing away with the carriages—and their associated horse stables. "The great white elephant in the room," said Neeson, is the "four prime locations on the West Side of New York that realtors must be salivating to get their hands on."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
He's much more famous to children as lovable researcher Alfred Kinsey.
I admit, I had to look up what he was in other than the 'Taken' movies ...
He was only in last weekend's #1 and #3 movies after all.
He is everyone--and no one.
Emily never learned to mind her surroundings.
With his 27-year-old teenage daughter.
That's understandable - he hasn't done enough movies involving abortion to capture your fancy.
OMG, is Elizabeth Nolan Brown someone's escaped monocle-polishing orphan?
I have never polished a monocle in my life.
Who, the horse?
The mayor said he would replace the "inhumane" option with "electric, vintage-replica tourist-friendly vehicles."
Piloted by CLOWNS!
Get happy, New York!
New York is piloted by clowns.
Where's that guy who figured out that de Blasio's campaign donors had designs on the property where the stables are located?
I'd check the East River.
Liam Neeson is best known for fighting [...] Siths
That never happened.
That is not what he's best known for, I sincerely hope. He's a fine actor with a good body of work.
First and foremost, training Batman how to fight.
Well, there was that saving some Jews movie. Excalibur?
There's so much revisionist history anymore. The other day someone tried to tell me there was an Indiana Jones set in the 50s. what nonsense
Obviously high. Next they'll be talking about Spock and Uhuru getting it on in a sea of lens flares.
What's that from, the animated series?
He never fought Siths?
I think in the Special Edition he was edited out along with Jar Jar Binks.
You don't talk about fight club. Sheesh.
You know he's not American...
"In August 2009, Neeson stated on ABC's Good Morning America that he had been naturalized as a United States citizen."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.....sonal_life
I hope Neeson goes all Bryan Mills on the mayor and his cronies and beat the shit out of them. I have a lot beef with Chicago's mayor Rahm Emanuel but I would choose him over de Blasio any day. Rahm is a parasite but at least he is somewhat smart enough to know to keep the host alive. De Blasio on the other hand wants nothing more then to drain the blood from the productive and give their carcasses to his supporters and cronies.
So we needed an Irishman to show us Americans how to FREEDOM?
There are a lot of U.S. citizens who seem to need a reminder. Sometimes the view is clearer from the outside.
http://vimeo.com/36314379
Okay, I'll forgive 33% of his participation in the movies that must not be mentioned.
Darkman?
The funny part about de Blasio and his ilk is that as much as they hate finance and the rich, without those sorts in NYC, the free shit he wants to hand out wouldn't be funded. Their hatred for those being productive stems from having to depend on them (through force obviously) to fund their bullshit programs.
...as much as they hate finance and the rich....
That's just it. They don't hate the rich. They hate the unconnected rich. They hate the guy (or lady) who doesn't owe their livelihood and existance to their favor. And the richer such a person is, the more they hate them.
The great white elephant in the room," said Neeson, is the "four prime locations on the West Side of New York that realtors must be salivating to get their hands on.
Considering the fact that a developer whose been eying the stables for some time (Steve Nislick) is a major DeBlasio donor, I'd say Neeson has a gift for understatement.
"he great white elephant in the room"
a good talking point sticks with the theme.
I'd have gone with
"And the horseshit that really stinks is that developers want these four locations."
And this is why I'm naming my first son Liam, my second will be MaxPowers.
my second will be MaxPowers
Here ya go.
The man you love to touch, although, to avoid copyright lawsuits, I'll need power to be plural.
"electric, vintage-replica tourist-friendly vehicles."
http://images.metmuseum.org/CR.....259724.jpg
I guess wheels would give it true door to door service.
Am I really going to be the first one to mention his performance in Krull?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DagmhnHWDLk
What a bunch of worthless reply posts. Not a single one actually addressed the issue at hand: Is it inhumane in this day and age to have a horse pull a wagon through the streets of New York.
I get that people's jobs are at stake. I also get that these horses spend a life pulling wagons and carts... and unlike in the past where this was a necessary use of animal energy, this is all about tourists and profit.
The tourists won't give a shit... they'll ride the electric cart, they'll ride the antique auto. I'm for the horses.
Ask a horse. They have ways to indicate their preferences. They can probably be taught sign language too. I got one to give its paw; horsey caught on faster than bow-wow.
Yeah, it is much preferable to the horse to be released into the wild so they can get rounded up by the BLM. Or they can get hooked up to one of those spinney carney contraptions for little kids to ride around in circles. Maybe they can go back to plowing fields. Trade them in for some magic beans. Weigh the cart pulling against reality for the horse. It is actually one of the better options.
Is it inhumane in this day and age to have a horse pull a wagon through the streets of New York.
No.
What exactly were the horses doing before we had cars?