Scott Shackford: Nobody, Gay or Straight, Has the Right to a Wedding Cake


The national public argument over Arizona Senate Bill 1062 revolved around who had the right to discriminate in the marketplace and what reasons (religion, in this case) they could use to justify such behavior. The bill was vetoed amid vocal outrage about the state putting its stamp of approval on discrimination. But a recent poll shows that a vast majority of Americans support the right of a photographer, for example, to decline to shoot a gay wedding. Scott Shackford argues that rather than looking at who can discriminate and for what reasons, we really should look at what goods and services are covered by public accommodation laws in the first place and whether the protections are even needed.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?