Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

World

Destruction of Syrian Chemical Weapons Arsenal Begins

UN backed team

Reason Staff | 10.6.2013 6:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

United Nations-backed weapons inspectors have begun the first phase of destroying Syria's weapons stockpile.

A joint team from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and UN staff have destroyed missile warheads and aerial chemical bombs.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: At Least 34 Dead in Egypt Clashes

Reason Staff
WorldSyria
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (4)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Ketogenic Paleo   12 years ago

    Why was it ever decided that chemical weapons were "special" and had to be destroyed anyways? Unlike, say, weaponized viruses they can't threaten to depopulate large areas. They serve a tactical purpose against military forces, like carpet bombers and tactical nukes (vs. traditional nukes that are meant for cities). Granted, they're currently used on civilians in a civil war and they're still relatively barbaric but what's next? What else will the Anointed Ones come up with? The Organisation for the Prohibition of Fragmentation Weapons?

    1. Ketogenic Paleo   12 years ago

      Hey I just remembered reading somewhere the Syrian chemical attacks that were reported recently were staged by the Islamists themselves not the gov't... however I'm pretty sure I got that from a biased anti-islamofascist website or podcast so that could be false. Or not.
      Damnit, the middle-east is full of conspiracies. It's hard enough being a libertarian & listening to Glenn Beck & the Kochs

    2. Sevo   12 years ago

      KP,
      The prohibition was a result of the general idealism at the end of The War to End All Wars. If carpet bombing had more of an effect in that war, I'm sure it would have been outlawed also.
      BTW, blockades were outlawed at the same time, as were submarine attacks without removing the souls from the ship attacked. You can see how effective those were.
      For that matter, if there's no record that the Japanese used gas or bio weapons on the Chinese, it's probably because the records are buried in the Russian archives.
      As to the war in Europe, the prohibition worked likely because Hitler was gassed in WWI, so he wasn't going to use it (bad idea anyhow; prevailing winds blow east), and the Allies weren't gonna be the bad guys, in spite of some pressure from Churchill.

      1. Harun   12 years ago

        Chemical weapons may be "banned" but countries still use them, and did during WW II.

        White Phosphorous rounds for example are supposedly used for "signalling" purposes, but our forces in WW II used them against German bunkers to get the occupants to flee and against German tanks as a blinding agent - a real no-no, but when you are in a Sherman against a Tiger - well...you might throw some sand in their eyes too.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Federal Inmate Had a Limb Partially Amputated After Being Kept in Restraints for Two Days

C.J. Ciaramella | 7.2.2025 2:12 PM

The First Amendment Protects CNN's Reporting on ICEBlock and Iran

Jack Nicastro | 7.2.2025 1:26 PM

New York City Tried To Seize Lucy the Pig. Mayor Eric Adams Says the Family Can Keep Her—If She Leaves Town.

Sophia Mandt | 7.2.2025 12:00 PM

Ed Clark, RIP

Brian Doherty | 7.2.2025 11:34 AM

Trump Visits $450 Million 'Alligator Alcatraz,' Suggests Taxpayers Should Fund More of Them

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 10:23 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!