Jacob Sullum on Marissa Alexander As a Reverse George Zimmerman
Last week a Florida appeals court ordered a new trial for Marissa Alexander, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for firing a shot into the ceiling during a 2010 confrontation with her husband at their Jacksonville home. Critics of George Zimmerman's acquittal in the killing of Trayvon Martin often cite the Alexander case as evidence of racial bias in the application of Florida's "stand your ground" self-defense law. But Senior Editor Jacob Sullum says Florida's law played no role in Zimmerman's defense and was arguably irrelevant in Alexander's trial as well. The factor that really mattered, Sullum argues, is one that Florida's justice system shares with those of every state: the presumption of innocence. Zimmerman benefited from it, he says, while the appeals court's ruling suggests Alexander did not.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?