California's 1940s-era urban-renewal policy, "redevelopment," is coming back, which means property rights are bound to suffer. As Steven Greenhut explains, the redevelopment law was designed to revive inner-city neighborhoods by giving city planners extra powers to invest tax dollars and direct development decisions in areas that were deemed to be blighted. But it morphed into a financial sleight of hand, whereby officials subsidized auto malls and hotels to divert tax revenues that would go elsewhere.
Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.
Reason is supported by:
No, but that's not stopping a litigious vegan from making his case.
Nunes attacked those who wanted to restrain NSA’s snooping. Clearly he never considered whether his call records would be exposed.
This is why we can't have serious conversations about government spending.
A 2017 Reason investigation found that black residents in Madison County felt under siege in their own neighborhoods.