Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Rand Paul

Matt Welch Discusses Chris Christie vs. Rand Paul on MSNBC

Matt Welch | 7.30.2013 4:39 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Last night I appeared on MSNBC's All In With Chris Hayes to discuss everyone's favorite putative-Republican-2016-candidate-on-putative-Republican-2016-candidate catfight: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie vs. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky):

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Man Who Austin Cop Chased, Shot, Killed Not Suspected of Any Particular Crime But May Have Been Up to No Good

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Rand PaulChris ChristieForeign PolicyLibertarianismNeoconservatism
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (16)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Right off the bat, Hayes stakes his position on attacks on disaster relief.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The argument is out in the open because Christie tries to bully his way around debate and Paul won't have any of it.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Sneaky. Welch contrasts Republican interventionists with libertarian non-interventionists. No mention on an MSNBC show about Democrats and where they fall in foreign policy.

    1. Matt Welch   12 years ago

      Factually incorrect. I said Obama was carrying out Dick Cheney's policies, and pointed out that Democrats have abandoned non-interventionist, pro-civil liberties politics, and certainly will in 2016, creating an opening for the likes of Rand Paul.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Specifically at the 5:25 mark, but fine. I'll accept the fact check. And I'll find a way to tweak my Official Hit & Run Commenting Live Blog format.

      2. Not a Libertarian   12 years ago

        In a close race, those 1-3 percent of center-left voters who might possibly vote for someone other than the Democratic nominee to make a point of civil liberties could be vital.

        They won't be voting for Paul of course.

        Maybe there will be a compelling Green nominee.

      3. Brian D   12 years ago

        Hayes looked like he was eating a lemon rind at that point.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Hayes ends the clip by urging the debate, I'm guessing because it's between Republicans. I doubt he'd be as thrilled if it was going on between, oh, say Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in a presidential primary. But I could be wrong.

    1. Skip   12 years ago

      Hayes and rest of MSDNC still pretend that Obama and Hillary have their 2007 national security positions.

  5. Corning   12 years ago

    Republicans are pissed at Christie.

    Does he really think starting a fight with Rand Paul is going to help him one bit in a race?

    Romney was smart in the Republican campaign and kept his mouth shut about the other candidates...he let his surrogates do that stuff for him.

  6. Juice   12 years ago

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....story.html

    Rand Paul says that we're not spending enough on the military.

    "They're precisely the same people who are unwilling to cut the spending, and their 'Gimme, gimme, gimme ? give me all my Sandy money now.'" Paul said, referring to federal funding after the hurricane last year. "Those are the people who are bankrupting the government and not letting enough money be left over for national defense."

    Someone send his dad over to smack him in the head.

    1. Calidissident   12 years ago

      Perhaps he's talking about actual national defense, and not wasteful needless military spending? If not, doesn't this contradict statements he's made in the past?

      1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        Probably rhetoric, though TBH I'd be fine with increasing military spending by a small % if we fix entitlements, end the bailout mentality, and take a more rational look at military intervention.

    2. JeremyR   12 years ago

      I think he's just pointing out that many Republicans have been crying about defense cuts

    3. fabius   12 years ago

      "We don't have enough money to adequately fund national defense" and "We're currently spending too much money on national defense" are not necessarily inconsistent sentiments.

  7. MappRapp   12 years ago

    Tha makes all kinds of sense dude.

    http://www.Anon-Top.tk

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

More Government Intervention Won't Make Concert Tickets Cheaper

Jack Nicastro | 5.27.2025 4:39 PM

Will Trump's Regulatory Reforms Do Enough To Unleash Nuclear Energy?

Jeff Luse | 5.27.2025 3:03 PM

Overcrowding and Dysfunction Produced a Quiet Riot at a Miami Federal Prison Holding ICE Detainees

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.27.2025 2:42 PM

Texas Revs the Growth Machine

Christian Britschgi | 5.27.2025 2:20 PM

The Pentagon Is Getting $150 Billion From the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Jack Nicastro | 5.27.2025 1:04 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!