Nick Gillespie: The Two Cases Used to Justify NSA Surveillance Don't Do Anything of the Kind
Defenders of massive, secret surveillance programs conducted by the National Security Agency and other parts of the goverment say they're in a bind.
"The instances where this has produced good—has disrupted plots, prevented terrorist attacks—is all classified," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) on This Week this past Sunday. Then she and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) invoked two particular cases that they say demonstrate exactly how ubiquitous surveillance of phone and Internet data is absolutely central to keeping Americans safe.
The only problem is that the two cases they invoked—one involving a federal drug informant—do nothing of the kind, argues Nick Gillespie.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?