Senate Moves Toward Making Your Electronic Documents Safer From Police Prying

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted today to send the Electronic Communications Privacy Act Amendments Act on to the full Senate for consideration. As The Hill explains:
The Senate Judiciary Committee approved legislation on Thursday that would require police to obtain a warrant before accessing emails, Facebook messages and other private online content.
The bill, which is sponsored by Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), was approved on a voice vote and now heads to the Senate floor.
Under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986, police only need a subpoena, issued without a judge's approval, to read emails that have been opened or that are more than 180 days old.
Additionally, PC World reports:
"Americans are very concerned about unwarranted intrusions into our private lives in cyberspace," said Senator Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat and main sponsor of the bill. "There's no question that if [police] want to go into your house and go through your files and drawers, they're going to need a search warrant. If you've got the same files in the cloud, you ought to have the same sense of privacy."
Well, yes.
It's a good day when confidentiality wins out over the constabulary. Both Houses of Congress need to approve this legislation as quickly as possible.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sigh, what good will this do when the Justice department simply tells the telecoms that they'll be exempt from prosecution if they play ball and give access without a warrant and that there'll be extra scrutiny if they don't?
Wait, Leahy is co-sponsoring? I smell a rat.
Lets see the text and find out.
With a simple twist of a phrase you can invert the actual meaning of a sentence while making it look at a casual glance to have not changed. Especially in a language like legalese.
"Americans are very concerned about unwarranted intrusions into our private lives in cyberspace," said Senator Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat and main sponsor of the bill.
Except, of course, when IP is maybe possibly in the mix.
Don't worry, I'm sure there will be thousands of exemptions to be handed out so that this law ultimately does nothing close to what it says it should do, and still screws over the common folk.
Hey, that's what legislation is for, dude.
don't hold your breath on being protected from govt intrusion of your privacy.
All your datas are belong to us.
OT: I don't know if anyone has posted this yet. Police raid wrong house, and kill the resident. But it's okay, the Chief says it wasn't the cops' fault.
Nice link.
You SF'd the link.
Real Link
It worked in the preview. I blame the Sciurus.
This just means that the police will continue to do it anyway, and if you can afford something better than a public pretender you might get the evidence suppressed.
Jessica Alba is still hot.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fem.....orter.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fem.....iffin.html
Jessica Alba suffers for beauty, commenters hate because bitches be hatin':
Pics or GTFO
Bank statements or GTFO.
Got off of work an hour early and picked up some SN Ruthless Rye at the local store, the fat lady in front of me in line was eyeing a tabloid with a story about Kim Kardasian' s pregnancy misery on the cover. She turns to me and says, ' 210 lbs? That ugly bitch is fatter than I am!'
I say, 'it's all about what's on the inside.' Voice oozing with sarcasm, so I thought.
She responds while head pointing to the cover, ' no it isn' t! '
Nice, finally something FOR the people!
http://www.GotzMyAnon.tk
Good for Leahy. I'll cross his name off my over the top shit list and put him on the common place vendetta one.