Hoaxes Within Hoaxes
A literary prankster runs amok.
Writing in the Times Literary Supplement, Eric Naiman tries to unravel a literary hoax -- an alleged encounter between Charles Dickens and Fyodor Dostoevsky -- and ends up finding a finely woven tapestry of additional hoaxes. The only thing that could make the article any better would be the revelation that "Eric Naiman" is just another pseudonym for the hoaxster. Read it here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH POLITICS I AM SO OUTRAGED
What this shows is that we need more government to expose these literary hoaxes and protect us from them.
Damn you all for wanting to shrink what keeps us safe!
Yo dawg, I heard you like hoaxes...
Eric Naiman: Nicer Mania
This is priceless.
Wow, what a piece. The tl;dr version: one mysterious and very lonely academic spends decades inventing a web of some half-dozen fictitious scholars who both promote and criticize each other's work on various subjects. And he sprinkles in some hints which (in context) seem to be meta-commentary about the hoaxster himself.
Truly bizarre. Impressive amount of research in here too.
Yes, a wonderful read. I love the idea of a slow, subtle, elaborate hoax that people have to figure out many years later.
"In my day, people put some effort into their sockpuppeting!"
That was a really interesting read - thx for posting, Jesse!
I would have rather read about an encounter between Robert E. Howard, HP Lovecraft and William Hope Hodgson
How about writing it?
Excuse me is I missed something for my head is spinning after that, but I wonder what the point of the Dostoevsky fraud was. The other instances fed off each other. This one seemed to stand alone and seemed a bit more puckish or malevolent, I'm not sure which.
Also, are we sure that the whole article wasn't stolen from notes for an unpublished Umberto Eco novel?
Grasshopper, you are making progress.