A.M. Links: Businesses Struggle With Obamacare Costs, Rand Paul Speech Overshadowed Rubio's, Police Deny Deliberately Burning Out Dorner
-
Small businesses nearing the 50-employee threshold that triggers many Obamacare regulations actively consider whether to curb their own growth. Why, yes, private sector employment is expected to suffer. On the other hand, big businesses are— Oh, that's right. They're cutting employees back, too, to reduce costs under the new law.
- Rand Paul's state of the union response overshadowed the official GOP speech and made Marco Rubio look like a squish.
- Sen. Diane Feinstein has scheduled a new hearing for February 27 on her proposed assault weapons ban, because she was unhappy with what witnesses at the last hearing had to say. Seriously, that's her announced reason.
- Thinning the tangle of federal criminal statutes would be one handy way to reduce the prison population, suggests the Congressional Research Service.
- Police say, uh uh, no way did they deliberately burn up Christopher Dorner in that cabin in the San Bernardino mountains.
- Greece remains a European (non)garden spot, with 27 percent unemployment and a third of the population expected to live in poverty by year's end. Actually, the economy is pretty crappy all across the Eurozone.
- Police in Syracuse, New York, refuse to give city officials details of the asset forfeiture money they receive or how it's used.
Have a news tip for us? Send it to: 24_7@reason.com.
Follow Reason 24/7 on Twitter: @reason247
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
'Blade Runner' Guns Down Girlfriend
Dating Replicants always leads to trouble.
Guy is obviously a good Libertarian.
I always knew there was something creepy about that guy. Then again I fall firmly in the GOB Bluth camp of maiming-freakout.
This is why there are no cyborg libertarians!
I have no idea who this guy is.
You probably do. It's the footless (shinless?) freak who had special carbon fiber "blades" mad so he could run really fast and be in the Olympics and shit.
I remember hearing about that. Thanks.
I think you mean so he could cheat at the Olympics.
Well, yeah, but he ended up sucking, didn't he?
His failure was a strong lesson to the kids who were considering amputating themselves in the name of athletic glory. Hopefully they got the message before it was too late.
Performance enhancing prosthetics will never be developed if we don't have adequate research subjects!
Also, he was a total and complete dick who didn't deserve the attention he was getting. I giggled at his Olympic fails.
In all honesty, I'd probably be a dick if I had no legs too.
Hey, he didn't dope. Because that would make him a bad person.
It's not cheating if they change the rules to allow it.
Ahhh. I was like - I don't remember him being in Bladerunner.
This ad is unfortunate, in hindsight.
http://www.ibelieveinadv.com/commons/nike5.jpg
Iceland considers pornography ban ruining the internet
Good luck with that, Iceland.
"Iceland is taking a very progressive approach that no other democratic country has tried," said Professor Gail Dines, an expert on pornography and speaker at a recent conference at Reykjavik University.
An EXPERT! How exactly does one become an EXPERT?
New? The hell it is
Those poor women who decided against their will to get paid for sex on camera.
Some of them becoming millionaires in the process. Yes, those poor manipulated women.
Acquaintance: "All pornography objectifies and harms women"
[Raises hand]Me: "Umm no. I'm pretty sure no women were objectified or harmed the last time I watched two guys wrestle each other to the floor in oil and bone."
Acquaintance: "Your pornography harms women by denying that women are necessary."
I don't really remember the rest of the conversation. I like to think that I beat her senseless during my fugue state but I'm pretty sure I just ate lunch and smiled like a broken idiot.
Wow. That is just priceless. Faced with a strong counterexample to her assertion she just keeps on going.
It's all in the programming. She puts the "then" in "if-then".
"Your pornography harms women by denying that women are necessary."
It's official: I have lost all hope in America.
Well, way to be... whomever the gay equivalent of an Uncle Tom would be.
/Time's I wish I could speak in Archer's voice.
Larry Craig?
Maybe Matt Moore? He's part of the ex-gay movement.
This guy has been naughty and needs to be punished.
They already knew - their phones told them
I had something for this.
I like to think that I beat her senseless...
Sounds like she was already there.
"Your pornography harms women by denying that women are necessary."
So how did you not say, "In what way does this not also mean my sexuality harms women?"
It probably came up, I'm not joking when I say I can't remember the conversation after that.
I don't blame you, I would suppress some bullshit like that too.
Well, they say if you do anything for 10,000 hours you become an expert at it.
There, you heard it straight from the monkey's mouth: bans are progressive.
My new group: The Ban Band. Imagine if we got banned!
The banned Ban Band.
"An EXPERT! How exactly does one become an EXPERT?"
Same way you get to Carnegie Hall - practice, practice, practice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icr02VbbCjY
How exactly does one become an EXPERT?
Maybe he did a lot of gay porn to pay for his graduate studies.
Ask sarcasmic.
Well, they got one thing right, at least. Totalitarian speech bans are progressive.
How exactly does one become an EXPERT?
How exactly does one become CERTIFIED as an EXPERT?
For a nominal fee, I can issue you a certificate testifying to the areas of your expertise. The more areas, the larger the fee, of course.
Well, OK.
But it has to look like this.
So, drawn by a child and signed using a spirograph?
Actually, we tried this before the internet. Does Gail Dines really want to go back to the days of scurrying in and out of Javier's XXX Adult Video Store on I-80 to purchase the latest Butch Trucker Sluts installment praying nobody happens to drive by and recognize her partner's car in the parking lot?
I'm an expert.
Iceland is taking a very progressive approach
She got one thing right. Progressive = ban.
Dang. Too slow. Next time, Rich, next time.
10,000 hours of practice.
Dude must watch a lot of porn.
They'd have better luck trying to ban ice.
Looks like no one will get the reward for Dorner because he wasn't 'arrested or convicted'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....x-cop.html
Like there was a chance the cop killer was not going to be executed. Sheesh.
Well I am sure they will re-invest that money in their training programs to ensure that they catch any 'future Dorners' before they murder four innocent people!
"Uh oh. This guy is complaining when officers assault people in handcuffs. Better do something before he goes Dorner on us."
Cue the LAPD and Mayor trumpeting their massive $1.5 million budget "cut" that can now be "invested" in MOAR POLICE EQUIPMENT.
An obvious first step would be to prohibit LAPD officers from filing police brutality reports against fellow LAPD officers.
If he was holed up, why not just wait for him to run out of food and ammo?
Assuming, of course, you want to arrest him and not kill him.
Because real cops chase the bear into its den.
Janet Reno!
They had to get it done with so America would watch the SOTU.
Time for this story to be completely forgotten about.
I mean I rarely watch cable news, but the fact that this hasn't become more of a story is fucking retarded.
But Marco Rubio took a sip of water!
Poland Springs no less. POLAND SPRINGS!
I think it's Moland Springs now.
Twofer. Nice.
If the guy were a Tea Party supporter, rather than an Obamabot, you can bet that this would be plastered on every news station for weeks, a la Newtown.
Yep.
I heard Headline News (I mean, HNN) say this morning that the cabin "accidentally caught fire". I'm sure that would work with my insurance company if my garage "accidentally caught fire" after I lobbed a few incendiary grenades into it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....ommit.html
This can't be true. Tulpa said our justice system is perfect and that no innocent person could ever be put to death.
All I know is if I got a last meal now, I'd want to wash it down with a warm glass of Ke$ha's pee.
At least you'd die with a buzz.
'sswrong with you?
I think her piss would kill you before the state could. Jesus...that's like something Warty would type, but Warty has standards.
Before they were put to death for unrelated murders, the equally unrelated Leo Jones and Claude Jones both had ordered steak and eggs for their last meals.
Can two people be unequally unrelated? How can one person be more related to another than that person is to the first?
Oh, I just saw that I missed "unrelated murders" in the first half of the sentence.
No, you were right the first time. Unrelated is unrelated; there aren't degrees of unrelated.
Now, you can be more or less related, true. But "un" is "un".
Not one of those cases describes any incontrovertible proof of any of these mens innocence. Is there some other website that provides a detailed proof or is all the proof like the one that says that 'twelve years after the guy was executed two people said he didn't do it'--because that's some pretty thin broth.
Ke$ha explains pee drinking
http://www.stuff.co.nz/enterta.....e-drinking
Ke$ha drinks her own piss, but Sparky would kiss her anyway.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....ntary.html
Never kiss on the lips.
Which ones?
Zing!
The ones that it's not OK for piss to be near. Duh! Those other ones are supposed to have piss go through them so they're fine.
Your logic is unbreakable.
/SNARK
Face it, Ke$ha is a vulgar and quite disgusting creature who drinks urine. You have what philosophers call a "conundrum", Sparky.-)))
Not at all. I admire Ke$ha for her weirdness and her joie de vivre. The world needs people like that in it. It doesn't hurt that I also think she's fairly attractive.
I also think she's fairly attractive.
Yeah baby!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....Under.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....othes.html
Yeah!
I think I'd rather bang the ham ass woman.
And you call me insane, Sparky,-)))
Oh well, to each their own, I suppose.
Also, it's not like she's the only one to ever drink urine.
A former prime minister of India drank his own urine as a form of alternative medicine.
Morarji Desai, the Indian leader from 1977-1979, even was interviewed on ABC News and 60 Minutes about his repulsive habit! In the ABC interview with Barbara Walters, Desai spoke at length about how he considered urine therapy a "cure for almost all diseases." He claimed the practice could even help with cataracts "if you catch them at the beginning and continue washing your eyes with it." On 60 Minutes with Dan Rather, he proclaimed urine therapy the "perfect" treatment for the millions of Indians who could not afford professional care at that time!
Despite what men such as Bear Grylls and Moraji Desai may tell you, consuming your own pee has no known health benefit. Yes, urine is 95% water, but the other 5% contains substances that are harmful for you - which is exactly why your body is expelling them in the first place! In fact, even if you are trapped with no access to water, it still might be a bad idea to drink urine. Survival experts are split on this issue.
R Kelly agrees.
What's worse? Drinking your own piss or washing your hands in your own piss Jorge Posada style?
Here's someone worse that both.
If that picture is to be believed she really needs to drink more water.
I would say that depends on what you need to wash off of your hands. There are a lot of things worse than piss. Unless there is something wrong with you, it should be pretty sterile.
'One time, someone told me I smelt like a shrimp on a diaper. I thought I could make a fragrance that was little like a shrimp on a Faberge diaper, but I don't know if people want to smell like that.'
Ladies and gentlemen, the most WTF person ever.
Nanny Bloomberg to ban Styrofoam.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....cycle.html
But have you seen his stance on speaking about styrofoam? It's a civil libertarian's dream!
Because of the dihydrogen monoxide?
I suppose at this point all the things that aren't banned would be a shorter list.
That which is not explicitly permitted is banned.
'[Styrofoam] is something that should go the way of lead paint.'
So Hizzonner wants ghetto kids to EAT Styrofoam?
It's OK, Ke$ha uses paper cups.
She uses red SOLO cups. Piss pong.
Where were these women when I was in high school?!?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....lmart.html
I was going to read this article but then I noticed the picture of a woman with a canned ham implanted in her ass and decided to read that instead.
John would.
One of them was at my high school. She also kept pointing out girls who were interested in me and suggesting how to approach them. Do I need to say she changed my life for the better?
I'm just going to be sexist and MALE GAZEy here: a decent looking older woman performing oral sex on a 15 year old male is not "abuse".
I agree. But the men on her jury will be thinking, A 15 year old boy cannot be allowed to get more play than me. "Burn the pedophile at the stake!"
I would hang that jury. Of course I'd be tossed off it for cheering "Plow her good and paint the kitchen, kid!"
I think you missed the mark when you said "men on her jury".
I'm sure the men will be carefully chosen. All married, old, and whipped. You know, to insure their impartiality.
Probably with the popular kids, just like the girls your age.
The best part about my 20th birthday was that I could finally start dating high school girls!
And she bought him smokes. I'm jealous as fuck.
My parents met in high school when my dad bummed a cigarette off my mom.
I realized the other day that this is also how I got together with my boyfriend, though we were at university.
So cute!
Smoking, running, and yoga have been my most consistent successes. Seriously, when you meet a runner or a chick from your yoga class out at a bar and you're both smoking, instant bond. Also, we don't have strip clubs here, so yoga is as close as I can get to seeing a bunch flexible 19 year old women nearly naked for a nominal fee.
There are places that don't have strip clubs?????
Yes. The triangle between Dothan AL, Jacksonville, and Alchua FL. To get to a decent one, its even larger. Probably Tampa/Orlando, J'ville, and I don't know where on the West.
I don't think anyone wants to think about a strip club in Florida. Can you image Marge and Valda center stage?
Tampa, Orlando, J'ville, Miami, and their suburbs all have nice places. As discussed before, Cafe Risque is... ugh. I think Tallahassee, having 2 universities and giant juco, with a population of approximately 35000 women between 18-23 would be ideal for a couple of classy places. Unfortunately, there's some sort of city or county ordinance. They have a "bikini" club for the brothers, but no strip clubs and I don't think the pale guys are invited.
ALWAYS target the chick at the bar smoking. Smokers put out.
My theory is they obviously don't care what's going into their bodies...
Some of us are extremely brand-loyal though.
Which was my downfall.
I was Coors and they were looking for Heineken.
Heineken? Fuck that shit. Pabst Blue Ribbon!
CN is a hipster?
They were looking for something skunky?
Hamm's?!
Sarc, I'm guessing these women were actually in the same grade as you when you were in high school.
New medal for drone pilots will have precedence over a Bronze Star with Valor device awarded to soldiers who actually get shot at.. I wonder if the medal will look like a joy stick? Or if they get a Purple Heart if they get a blister on their firing thumb?
"""""The Distinguished Warfare Medal will be awarded to pilots of unmanned aircraft, offensive cyber war experts or others who are directly involved in combat operations but who are not physically in theater and facing the physical risks that warfare historically entails.
The new medal will rank just below the Distinguished Flying Cross. It will have precedence over ? and be worn on a uniform above ? the Bronze Star with Valor device, a medal awarded to troops for specific heroic acts performed under fire in combat.""""
http://www.marinecorpstimes.co.....ar-021313/
Drone pilots get medals.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....-Star.html
How many children must you kill to get one?
C-
^^F
There's a points system based on the kid's age, nationality and a difficulty modifier. Lose your drone and you have to put in another million quarters.
I believe they will be using the Death Race 2000 Scoring System. You get a medal at 1000 points and an oak leaf cluster for every following 750 points.
Sloopy I caught your post about Baby Reason. I assume she will be in surgery in 3 weeks? Will it be at Stanford Medical?
Well, we go for the consultation on the 4th. Our doctor said we should expect the surgery to follow in short order. And yes, it will be at Stanford Medical.
I've been doing my research, and it looks like a top-flight medical center. We're feeling pretty good about it.
By the way, my parents have been here visiting all week, and the reaction Baby Reason is having to them is just amazing. She's smiling and laughing quite a bit more than before. I guess she's just so used to us that she already thinks her parents are squares.
Nah, she's angry with you for not giving her the tomahawk and letting her show the ducks who's boss
But she's a baby and I live in California. I would imagine letting her wear an Atlanta Braves jersey would get me a visit from CPS. Allowing her to wield a real tomahawk would get me shipped 40 miles down the road to Corcoran State Prison with Charlie Manson and Juan Corona.
Allowing her to wield a real tomahawk would get me shipped 40 miles down the road to Corcoran State Prison
Just claim you were introducing her to Native American technology and traditions. You were educating her in a politically correct and non(European)- traditional manner.
Carpal tunnel is now the equivalent of a shrapnel wound.
That is just F'ing great. Jack Devore Dunn goes out with 24 other planes at Midway, comes back with only one other besides his - gets a DFC and a DSM and he rates one tick above someone sitting at a remote terminal in Nevada blowing people up by pushing a button.
Above a BSM with "V" device?!! I think we should go all John F'ing Kerry and fling our medals over the White House fences.
The V is the only Bronze Star that matters. I watched them hand out Bronze Stars like candy after the Gulf War to all the staff pukes at Regiment.
Meanwhile my Air Team had our Navy Achievement Medals for actions on the battlefield downgraded to Letters of Appreciation.
It's the Pouge Medal of Honor.
THIS!
You think that's bad; when the Navy gives out a unit award now, any goverment civilians or contractors attached to that unit get it too. I've gotten a Navy MUC without having even been in the military.
Hey, it beats an indictment for first degree murder.
Police in Syracuse, New York, refuse to give city officials details of the asset forfeiture money they receive or how it's used.
Maybe it's a crime to know how the asset forfeiture money is being used so the police are really just saving city officials from having their assets forfeited. Ever think about that??
They just don't want anyone to know how many gallons of Aqua Vitae Ke$ha they bought.
It's also a crime to AM link a story that we had a formal post about at least a week ago.
Take it easy on J.D. Not everyone reads H&R.
Call in the national guard to storm police headquarters. Bomb it if necessary.
I think the police department is confused as to whom they are actually employed by. Were I the city, I would call in the state investigatve bureau, close the police, and contract with the county sheriffs.
Just when everyone thinks California is the most fucked up state, and the LAPD is the most fucked cop-shop - New Yorkers chime in.
I haven't figured out the big deal about this model. She's fawned over in the DM on a regular basis.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....video.html
Even by my standards she could use a few cheeseburgers. And her face? What's up with her face?
Its like modern art, different is considered to be the same as good.
Wtf, her eyebrows are thicker than mine.
And her face? What's up with her face?
High-fashion models are supposed to be "striking," not "beautiful" per se, so you will remember them.
Even by my standards she could use a few cheeseburgers.
She can start by stuffing them in her bra; she's built like a 12 year old boy.
Nice body; not pretty.
Disagree. I like her face but her body is meh. It's fine to be svelte but be svelte - not shapeless.
She looks like Sheldon on Big Bang.
She has an interesting face, and an oddly proportioned head. Not a beauty, but she does remind me of the kind of visually stark waifs directors like Fellini would cast in the background of their films, especially from that set of photographs which has that fill to them.
Ali Larter is still good enough to eat.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....class.html
How would you know when you can't see her in any of the pictures?
Rachel Weisz makes a face.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....miere.html
Idris Elba wishes the ladies happy love day
http://twitter.yfrog.com/ebiwqxyxfynxbufrkngdmttqz
That's good. That's like a 40-degree day. Ain't nobody got nothing to say about a 40-degree day.
Police in Syracuse, New York, refuse to give city officials details of the asset forfeiture money they receive or how it's used.
Independent financing of the police and military was one of the features of banana republics.
*Was?*
How soon before we start conducting criminal trials like this?
The British have already gotten rid of double jeopardy in order to keep having trials until they get the guilty verdict that the government wants.
what did she say about Harry Reid's describing her bill as DOA?
Can't she have those dead children's bodies dug up and prop them up around the hearing room. Then she'll just keep repeating "Something must be done. Something must be done. Something must be done."
Of couse the corpses won't argue with her impecable logic.
Where is Chuck Testa when you really need him?
I few months ago, I was talking to my former boss. The person who handles the financial and HR and other such duties, told them she will quit the day they hire employee #50.
They were 15-20 in size when I worked there in the 90s and about 35-40 now, so they arent that close, but they have no intent to get there either.
Does her severance package come with a large dose of Eau d'Ke$ha?
Can we please not have every thread all day involve Kesha's pee? Please?
I don't know, it brings a certain amount of pisstique to every topic.
Seconded.
It's pissing you off, isn't it?
(Seriously, I agree.)
we peons can dream can;t we?
Never beg for mercy, nicole. They have no pity.
I just want a polling feature on the site now, if we have to talk about Kesha pee. How many of you assholes have peed on someone or been peed on? Huh?
Sexually? Or because they were passed out at a party and probably deserved it?
Sexually, of course. I mean I'm just assuming you've all passed out in a bathtub in the middle of a party before.
Bathtub? That would have been a much better idea.
if we have to talk about Kesha pee.
That's Kedollarsignha, thank you very much.
Peeing ourselves is OK though, right?
How many of you assholes have peed on someone or been peed on?
No comment. Srsly. You don't want to know.
So that's why your posts always smell vaguely of wee. Is it a Kentucky thing?
The entire state of KY smells vaguely of pee. They aren't sure if it is all caused by SugarFree.
This sounds like a sensitive issue for you. Something you want to share?
How many of you assholes have peed on someone or been peed on?
Does pissing yourself count?
Does pissing yourself count?
"He likes the warm feeling,
but he's tired of all the dehydration."
Urine trouble if you keep this up, Whiterun Guard.
I see what you...
Oh never mind.
There was a great moment on Twitter of business owners lamenting cuts they would be making to get under the 50 employee threshold. The Obamabots then accused all of them of sabotaging their businesses because they just didn't want Obama's presidency to succeed. Plus, obviously, racism.
http://twitchy.com/2012/11/08/.....oing-same/
Not to mention greed. They should just cut the higher-ups' salary, profits, whatever, until they can hire more wise Latinas or whatever.
jesus on a cracker. With these folks, EVERYTHING is about Obama. No one does anything without considering how it reflects on Him.
In many ways, it is a cult.
In many ways, it is a cult.
Its a marginal cost thing: the marginal cost of that 50th employee may be huge, depending on how much complying the employer mandates will cost the company. It will be very difficult to justify absorbing that huge cost and getting a positive ROI on that employee.
Rational economic responses to an irrational political solution. Whodathunkit?
Of course, the howler monkeys decrying this move know nothing about marginal costs, so obviously, it can only be treasonous.
Gee, who ever could have predicted that? How is it not fucking obvious to everyone that Obamacare will retard job growth? And now he wants to throw a $9 minimum wage in.
A $1 million reward had been offered for Dorner's capture and conviction.
As good custodians of the taxpayers' money, California *had* to kill him.
The picture above of Feinstein is a practice run for her Madame Tussaud's exhibit.
Looks like she melted a bit.
Too much meth.
So, anyone here have firsthand knowledge of the Rochester, NY area? Just found out yesterday that the company I work for is closing the building I work at in June. There is a potential offer to stay with the company and relocate to Rochester but I'm not sure if I want to accept just yet.
Cold, bleak, empty.
That's not the most charitable description, but I find upstate NY and much of PA to be very depressing to drive through, which is my main experience with them.
I swear you can tell you're in upstate as soon as you cross from Mass or Vermont. All the towns look like they stopped breathing in 1949.
On the plus side, I hear Rochester area is not an economic deadzone, and you get strong gun control laws.
I'm not against guns but I don't own any. Gun laws wouldn't be a sticking point for me.
But if ever came a time you wanted a gun, you can count on having arguably the worst gun laws in the country to navigate.
Chicago begs to differ.
I would actually argue that NY gun laws are worse than Chicago, at least now that they've passed the latest bill. I have to jump through hoops, and I can't have "assault weapons," but I can still have a bunch of shit they can't. Like a fucking 12-round mag.
Rochester I think is actually close enough to NYC and it's economic aura that it could be livable.
Rochester is halfway between Buffalo and Syracuse. Saying it's close to NYC is like saying Philadelphia is close to Pittsburgh.
I know nothing about Rochester itself, but the nearest major city is Buffalo, which is a smaller version of Detroit. Lots of American NHL'ers come from that region though, so if you're into hockey I'm sure there's some good rinks.
I stand corrected, I was thinking of New Rochelle. Alzheimer's setting in.
It is closer to Cleveland than NYC. In many ways.
Rochester is a 5hr plus drive from NYC. People seem to have no idea how big New York State is.
I have a good friend from Rochester whose sister went into prostitution just to stay above water when their economy bottomed out. They were from an upper middle class family.
Me too, in my mind it's never sunny or warm up there.
And I say this as someone who has happily lived in Canada and Chicago and likes the cold and the "north country" in general. But upstate NY is bleaker than an Indiana cornfield to me for some reason.
Upstate New York: Would you like some Ohio in your West Virginia (tm)?
Yeah, that.
I went to school in Ithaca. one you get out of town, it's blight for miles and miles.
Me too. Never went to Rochester though, but everything in the counties around Ithaca is Mississippi without the sunshine.
Same number of Confederate flags, though.
No shit. Cornell?
I was on the South Hill -- IC
Ah, I guess you can't come to Spoony and my secret parties. Though maybe you can head back to Ithaca for a weekend bender with us.
god, i did that 2 years ago with my college friends. and passed out at that Super 8.
and they changed Moonshadows into some sort of night club. a shot and beer type place was serve drinks out of fishbowls. I died a little that night.
I never spent that much time on the Commons. Too far from my apartment near North Campus, and almost as far from the lab were I spent the majority of my time anyway.
I'm trying to figure out when to take the wife up there this spring for a romantic nostalgia weekend. But it's so damn long until spring reaches Ithaca.
Ideally involving sneaking into Donlon and making out.
i'd go in May or June.
Go for Slope Day. Do it!
yes -- slope day. we used to crash that.
Slope Day
Also, Auric, Slope is not the preferred nomenclature. Vietnamese-American, please.
Walter, he peed on my rug!
I.... don't get it.
Context.
Ithaca College is higher atop Cayuga's waters.
I'm at a complete loss for why you linked that. Did you think I wasn't aware of IC?
I didn't realize you went to Cornell. At least, that's the implication I get from reading the subthread after I posted. I figured you knew Cornell was in Ithaca and were showing off. 😉
(My sister went to IC.)
Cornell '74. Baker Lab basement. Oh, the horrors. But I got to talk with Sagan a few times.
Wasn't there a small side discussion on the horrors of upstate NY a few days ago?
Try living there.
And add Ohio for the trifecta.
I find central PA lovely to drive through. I just wouldn't want to live there.
Rochester, New York.
Rochester was ranked as the sixth 'most livable city' among 379 U.S. metropolitan areas in the 25th edition (2007) of the Places Rated Almanac.
But yeah, fairly cold and alot of snow in the winter, short summers. My wife grew up in that region.
Also, I think NYS's income tax rate is 7%.
Coming from Mass, that's not a huge jump. My wife and I were looking at houses last night and the prices were insanely low. I can only guess that it's because property taxes are insanely high.
Good old Massachusetts: a government peopled with officers so stupid, venal and greedy that they manage to make the state less attractive a place to live and work than upstate NY.
It's because there is a ton of land and no one wants to live there. Where in MA are you now?
Springfield, the Western Mass city that at least isn't Holyoke.
Hey, you've...uh.... got Six Flags?
If you are in Springfield I can't imagine Rochester being any worse than where you are now
But this is a chance for him to get out!
Sparky, what field are you in?
IT, systems analyst.
Oh shit, you can find work without going to Rochester! You probably don't even need to come out to Boston.
Oh, I know I could find work in the area. That's most likely what I'll do. I was just trying to weigh that against a guaranteed job with a change of scenery.
The IT dept at my metrowest company is hiring.
"Have you tried turning it off and on again?"
"Have you tried turning it off and on again?"
"I swear to Christ, if you read me one more line from that script, I'm flying my ass to Kansas or India or wherever the fuck you work and burning it down. Now put me on the phone with someone who doesn't need a script to solve my problem. " -- actual discussion I had with my ISP after moving for the 3rd time in 14 months and going through the same script every time at the new place.
"Have you tried turning it off and on again?"
You know, I don't go around telling people how to use the Dewey Decimal System. I'll thank you to stop giving away trade secrets.
Blame The IT Crowd.
Hey if you happen to know of anyone looking for a Test Automation Developer or QA manager type I happen to be in the market effective 2 weeks from today.
Yes. I know a guy at custommade.com and they are hiring like mad.
Hey, is that Mardi Gras strip club still there?
Hey, is that Mardi Gras strip club still there?
Yes, although one on the other side of the street exploded back in December.
You should ask yourself, "How much do I love the Sabres?" Because if it's not a lot, then you may not be happy Oct-Apr.
Sounds like hockey? Do people really watch hockey? I mean, watch it like it's a real sport?
It's near a religion around here. Granted, this may have a great deal to do with how bad the Bills are. It's a great game. Grab some beer, and I'm sure you'll find folks to explain the finer points of the game. (If it makes you feel better, there are some great minor league baseball teams with a great fan base in the area. Nothing better on a summer evening.)
Heathen.
I have family in the Finger Lakes area just south of Rochester, and some family in Rochester. I do not visit them in the winter. Summers are humid with lots of thunder, spring and fall are really nice. There are a ton of vintners and brewers around the lakes, and a few distillers. I think it's really pretty country, but I don't have to live there
I grew up in Central NY. Once you get out of New York City/ West Chester, the rest of New York State isn't so bad. I am actually going to guess it is a lot like Western Mass in terms of climate most of the year. Yes, you will get a ton of snow. Summers can be humid. Your closest metropolitan center is Toronto (2.5 hours away). That being said, there are stil a lot of nice things out there. Housing prices are good. It is bleak and sparse in places, but there are lots of state parks in the area if that is your thing. And bad traffic is when you can only get up to 50 MPH on the interestate. Finger lakes is great for wine and craft brewing is starting to pick up in the area as well. You even can get your gambling on at an Indian Casino or two. The worst thing about the area are the economic prospects, but if you have a good job already it is not a terrible place to live.
It's actually a pretty nice place to live.
The Western New York region is filled with architectural wonders, some great history, and incredible food. Cost of living is low (there are incredible home finds for under 100k) and the people are excellent. Winter is a bitch for those of weaker nature, but the summer and fall are better than any place in the US.
Bad news is the state government. It's one of the most over taxed, over nannied, business unfriendly regions you can imagine. To get anything going you *need* the patronage of some political type. "Which politicians do you know?" is one of the first questions any start up gets asked. (Not making this up!)
Buffalo is nearby, and it's a great town. I lived in Portland, Austin, LA, Denver, etc but I made my home here.
I live in Rochester. I enjoy it (save the retarded gun laws), although i dont mind snow or cold and I have friends here. Anything specific you want to know?
One for the lawyers: Ronald Dworkin has died
Isn't Dworkin the guy who created the Pattern of Amber?
+1 internets
And fucked a unicorn.
He chose to divide his life almost equally between Britain and the US, with a townhouse in London and an unusual 19th-century mews cottage just off Washington Square in New York, as well as a third home, on the island of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, where he enjoyed sailing.
1%er !1!1!
Emphasis mine. There's no reason to believe he's lying.
Depends on what "we" means.
Feinstein has scheduled a new hearing for February 27 on her proposed assault weapons ban, because she was unhappy with what witnesses at the last hearing had to say.
Serious question: What exactly was said that she's "unhappy" about?
Probably, "You a stupid hoe, you a you a stupid hoe" or words to that effect.
Yeah, I suppose she doesn't consider herself to be stupid.
Jezebel applauds Obama's plan for universal preschool because some people have trouble affording day care.
It's the bluntness that surprised me. Some people need day care for their kids so we all have to pay for it. They don't even try to bury that part anymore.
No, that part is open. It's the "we want more influence over your kids than you" that is still somewhat hidden.
Eventually the indoctrination will be conducted prenatally.
It will be a Brave New World when that happens.
As long as I can get myself exiled to an island with a good supply of SOMA and a handful of B- hotties to cater to my every need I won't complain too badly
I won't complain too badly
I'm sure the Soma would take care of that regardless.
That and the "feelies"
Since the White House already covered the ways universal preschool helps kids, here's a breakdown of how it helps everyone else.
Ugh. Good thing I haven't had breakfast yet.
Amazingly, the commenters aren't huge fans.
Comments are still super depressing though. Do. Not. Have. Kids. You. Can't. Afford. It's really, really easy.
But then like, you have to be reasonable with your sexual decisions. And that's slut shaming, or something.
nice sentiment but govt policy rewards people for making bad decisions. Can't afford that 5th child? No worries, man. Momma Govt is here to help feed, clothe, and care for the child while you go about conceiving number 6.
I'm pretty sure I heard some proggies saying that having true choice means not being constrained by your finances in having as many or as few children as the woman wants. So Clearly you're wrong here nicole. The proggies say so.
jesse- There is a similar argument for abortion. The Jezzies assert that there should be federal funding of abortion (well, most want universal health care, with that covered as an option) because if poor women can't afford abortion, then they don't really have "meaningful access" to that right. Think if I asserted that my right to free speech was being curtailed because I didn't have the funds to buy up an hour of prime time every night.
Its basically a repacking of Marx's argument, that political freedoms such as voting or speech were meaningless as long as you had to slave away from the man and couldn't just live your life how you wanted to, free from want, man.
Oh totally. I like the structure of the argument though. It sounds nicer than just saying "If I choose to treat my uterus like a clown car you should expect to be on the hook for that."
"Do. Not. Have. Kids. You. Can't. Afford."
It's really amazing how much people don't want to hear that. As if no one should have to bear any responsibility for their actions.
Well I think it's the one people want to hear the least because they don't want to hear that they shouldn't have such a CUTE LITTLE BUNDLE OF OMIGOD JOY just because of base material concerns.
I received what I consider a badge of honor yesterday. (So, I'm easily entertained, sue me).
A proggie who considers himself quite the intellect was extolling the virtues of Head Start on a friend's FB page. I pointed out that HHS' own study released in 2010 showed no discernible improvement in a single one of 144 parameters measured among 5,000 Head-Starters by the time they entered first grade.
He hit me with a plethora of links as citations for his argument, all of which were opinion pieces which did nothing to refute my case. When I pointed that out, he blocked me...which caused everyone else to mock him soundly.
When I get blocked, I know I have won.
They were plenty blunt in their praise for Sandra Fluke and her standing up for the right of women everywhere to have other people subsidize their promiscuity.
Can we please stop acting like the Sandra Fluke debacle had anything to do with promiscuity other than the retarded interjections of Rush Limbaugh? Christ.
+1
She wanted them to subsidize all birth control, which would be way more expensive.
I thought it had to do with her falsely claiming she couldn't possibly afford birth control unless it was subsidized. I could give a shit why she wanted the stuff.
Yes, it did (well, "claiming," at least, and probably "falsely"). The idiocy developed when people acted like they didn't know that if you were on the Pill, you take it every day, and it has nothing to do with how much sex you have or how many partners.
come on...most people know how the pill works. We just don't want to have to pay for someone else's.
Being on the pill enables you to have more sex/partners without increasing BC costs...
Being on the pill enables you to have more sex/partners without increasing BC costs...
OTOH, it greatly increases the public health dangers and costs by spreading VD more easily.
The idiocy developed when people acted like they didn't know that if you were on the Pill, you take it every day, and it has nothing to do with how much sex you have or how many partners.
She claimed that her birth control was costing $5,000 / yr which is why "her friend" couldn't afford it.
Rush's about how much sex you'd have to have for bc to cost that much was lame but not as lame as Fluke's bullshit.
And his ratings went up after the controversy so I'm not sure how lame it was on Rush's part anyway.
It was pretty lame. Each instance of idiocy should be evaluated on its own. Two idiotic statements do not cancel each other out.
She claimed it cost $3k, which I said at the time I thought was high but not outside the realm of possibility if she's taking a name-brand pill and her insurance covers neither a negotiated price on the pill nor a negotiated price on a doctor visit to get the pill. I was an uninsured person on brand-name BC for a while and I paid $75/month * 13 = 975, plus about $300 for a doctor visit. So I think she was quoting high, but within the right order of magnitude.
And my point wasn't that Rush was "lame," my point was that he was acting like the amount of sex you have has ANY bearing on the cost of birth control if your chosen method is oral contraceptives.
There is a connection, but it's only relevant going from 0 to anything greater than 0. That still means the amount of sex you're having has an effect on your birth control costs. Yes, going from 5 times a month to 20 times isn't going to cost anymore, but going from 0 to 1 time will.
It's not actually going from 0 to 1 time, it's going from "zero possibility of ever having sex" to "any possibility of having any nonzero amount of sex."
Only when the left agrees to stop telling me that it's about women who need BC for legit medical reasons.
I don't deny that there are many women who fall in to said category, but let's not pretend that it's any more than a minuscule amount of the sum total of all of those who use or want BC pills.
Just look at what it's called: the "birth control pill".
Time to redefine the terms. The left is so good at that. I'm thinking MC pill: Menstrual Cycle pill.
Yep.
I'm not pretending it has anything to do with endometriosis or other medical conditions for most people; I'm saying it has nothing to do with promiscuity.
What's the point of being on birth control if you don't plan on having sex (and you aren't one of those rare women with some medical condition)?
Regularization of the menstrual cycle, minimization of menstrual pain and discomfort, and in some women it makes an effective acne treatment.
Agreed.
But we're talking about a small subset of those on the pill. For anyone to pretend that the vast majority of the women on it aren't on it specifically to avoid getting pregnant is disingenuous beyond all fuck.
I'm sure glad I don't have to justify my insulin to my employer's insurance.
I'm sure glad I don't have to justify my insulin to my employer's insurance.
Lack of insulin will kill you; a lack of sex won't.
And you do have to justify your overall food and health choices, as you have a metabolic and endocrine disorder, chronic and incurable.
Regularization of the menstrual cycle
This is true. Most women don't have problems with multiple menses during a given ~28 cycle, however. It is appropriate for menorrhagia and atypical menses.
minimization of menstrual pain and discomfort
Lo-lovera and nuva rings aren't the only TX for this.
and in some women it makes an effective acne treatment.
So is Accutane and Proactiv (OTC).
First of all, because never having a period is WAY awesomer than ever having a period.
But mostly because "having sex" has nothing to do with being "promiscuous."
But mostly because "having sex" has nothing to do with being "promiscuous."
Oxford dictionary disagrees.
As does Mirriam-Webster.
Taber's as well, but I can't link to it directly.
That's only true in the most literal possible reading of my words. "Having or characterized by many transient sexual relationships" does not exactly describe someone who has sex all the time with one person.
don't be dense, Doc. nicole's point is that the mere fact one has sex does not make one promiscuous.
It's amazing that, what, a year later? we are still having conversations about whether all women on birth control are sluts.
Too right. And not just sluts as in a promiscuous woman - I think it was John last year who was claiming subsidised BC is essentially paying a woman to have sex and therefore she's a prostitute.
But then we all know there are some women issues around here
Yep...I totally became a slut when I went on the pill. It had nothing to do with, you know, being prepared just in case a sex partner came into my life. Women get all cray-cray and lose all sexual discrimination when those hormones start a-rollin in!
I honestly had no idea men thought women who were on the pill were somehow automatically promiscuous. Color me educated.
You're the first one to say that.
I'm just arguing that women take birth control because they want to have sex (but not a baby). Hell, that's the reason my girlfriend is on it. You're the one who is making the leap from that to "slut".
I am not the first one to say it. Above, Redmanfms (who later softened the claim) said that Fluke was "standing up for the right of women everywhere to have other people subsidize their promiscuity."
And my "we are still having conversations about" comment clearly referred to the initial threads we had ages ago about this. Where, yes, people absolutely did explicitly and implicitly say that women on hormonal birth control were sluts, regardless of actual sexual activity.
It's amazing that, what, a year later? we are still having conversations about whether all women on birth control are sluts.
I am much more critical of male sexual behaviour than female sexual behaviour.
Coitus is a bright line.
don't be dense, Doc. nicole's point is that the mere fact one has sex does not make one promiscuous.
I'm not, I am using a strict medical definition.
Doc, any definition of promiscuity is going to be related to having sex, without it's a strict medical definition or the definition from a guy on the street. I can't believe you got called out for that.
My wife has had one sexual partner in 22 years and has been on hormonal birth control the entire time.
Is my wife "promiscuous"?
No.
But no one else should have to pay for her to remain not pregnant. And her being on the pill likely is an advantage for you because she's able to have sex without fear of becoming pregnant. Removing that fear at someone else's expense would certainly have the affect of promoting promiscuity in some people.
That is the argument being made by anyone who isn't being a tool.
I'm not advocating they should have to (my subsidy joke below notwithstanding) but arguing that all women want free birth control so they can be sluts isn't going to go all that far with the considerable number of paying women who either want BC to not get pregnant in their monogamous relationship, use BC for other reason that have nothing to do with sex, or want it for the purposes of sluttitude yet are fine paying for it themselves (the bloated non-OTC prices notwithstanding.)
Is my wife "promiscuous"?
Is she faithful?
Is she faithful?
My cock tamed her years ago.
My wife has had one sexual partner in 22 years and has been on hormonal birth control the entire time.
Do you at least know the guy's name? It is a guy, right?
It is a guy, right?
I think so.
Doc, any definition of promiscuity is going to be related to having sex, without it's a strict medical definition or the definition from a guy on the street.
In medical speak, this is called, "Establishing a baseline".
You either have sex, or you don't. One person, monogamous. More than one, but discrete and discriminate, polygamous. Indiscriminate and more than one person, promiscuous. What people object to is the dispassionate term perceived as a negative term, and it is not.
Simply stating the dull and dispassionate fact here.
Doc, any definition of promiscuity is going to be related to having sex, without it's a strict medical definition or the definition from a guy on the street.
In medical speak, this is called, "Establishing a baseline".
You either have sex, or you don't. One partner, monogamous. More than one, but discrete and discriminate, polygamous. Indiscriminate and more than one partner either singular or multi, promiscuous. What people object to is the dispassionate term perceived as a negative term, and it is not.
Simply stating the dull and dispassionate fact here.
A strict medical definition that specified "many transient sexual relationships," "an unselective approach; indiscriminate or casual," or "not restricted to one sexual partner." Which goes far beyond "the mere fact one has sex."
Which goes far beyond "the mere fact one has sex."
I did say, "Coitus is a bright line."
I did say, "Coitus is a bright line."
I don't think I understand your point here.
Sexual intercourse, heterosexually and male homosexually speaking, requires (organic) penetration, either rectally or vaginally, excluding male fellatio.
Yes, I am more than aware of sex via instrumentation, but my hobby horse is definitions, and the thing I disagree most with redefining terms to suit a particular axe-grinding agenda either way.
I don't really care how many sex partners you have, unless I am TX'ing you, nicole, and my statements are value neutral, but the act of coitus itself doesn't happen by magic.
Okay, well I don't think it happens by magic either, and I'm not trying to redefine anything. I don't think it's a redefinition to say that someone who has sex with exactly one other person for nine years is not "promiscuous," and being on the pill just has no effect on that.
I don't think it's a redefinition to say that someone who has sex with exactly one other person for nine years is not "promiscuous," and being on the pill just has no effect on that.
They aren't "promiscuous", that is the textbook definition of "monogamy". The point is, sexual health is a lifestyle. Full stop.
And I am admittedly a huge fan of it, medically and morally, and I have yet to find one documented medical case where someone died of a lack of sex.
Also, the pill does not protect against STD, which actually, is my larger medical concern here, and it amazes me how libertarian types suddenly become Chi-Coms and Soviet Russia Pinkos when even discussing sexual behaviour comes up, to the point of subsidizing it.
Okay, I think we are just talking past each other. I don't want to subsidize anything, I think Sandra Fluke is an immoral person for calling for it (and doing so in a particularly immoral way), but when she first got her 15 minutes it set off an absolute shitstorm of people here and elsewhere making absurd claims about the sexual habits of any woman on the pill. Which, as you can see above, continues to this day. And I will continue to call bullshit on it because it's insulting and completely stupid.
nicole, I agree with you 100%, I really do. I'm not pure as the wind driven snow and neither is Dr. PG, but the conflation of behaviour, medical, and fiduciary (insurance) is now impossible to untangle and has been for arguably since 1963 (CMS).
I was one of those people with whom it set off a shitstorm because it minimizes legit medical concerns (and others, like mental illness and pain), but when some firebrand claims a behaviour is a need and should be subsidized, then I have a problem.
I could write a book on this, and since people will not accept that in a free market society that some people will lose out, then the Commie shit comes out, and I happen to live in Commietopia and see it every day.
And I remind you, I am more critcal of mens' sexual habits than womens'. Just me making suggestions about condom use sets off a shitstorm.
Absolutely right.
But I shouldn't have to pay to keep a faithful woman (one who has sex with just one partner) not pregnant any more than I should have to pay to keep a promiscuous one not pregnant.
And though being on BC shouldn't imply promiscuity, having it provided to you for "free" can certainly encourage it.
Newssflash...a woman who wants to have sex will do it with or without the pill.
Seriously? No fucking way.
My wife takes it so she only needs to have 4 periods a year rather than 12.
ALL WOMEN ON BIRTH CONTROL ARE PROMISCUOUS AND I HATE THEM
The thing that realyl gets me is that not on;y must it be provided by all insurance, but it can't cost anything out of pocket. Even if it is necessary for non-BC reasons, why shouldn't it be like any other drug. Antibiotics are a whole lot more necessary in most cases where they are needed and somehow people manage to come up with the co-pay.
You strip away the religious nonsense and the progressive "everything must be free!" shit and you are left with a non-OTC drug whose price is greatly inflated because of the 3rd party payer problem rampant in medicine.
There are two solutions: make it OTC and watch the price tumble to where the cost objection is eliminated (or at least mockable) or have it be covered by the insurance women are forced to pay into and employers are mandated to carry. Any employer that has an objection to it can refund their employees who object the amount that would have been covered. Clean hands all around.
Making it OTC is the only sane way to administer BC.
"Making it OTC is the only sane way to administer BC."
Agreed. This whole stupid debate could be killed if they did that.
Agreed. This whole stupid debate could be killed if they did that.
Release Big Pharma of liability and your wish will be granted.
Release Big Pharma of liability and your wish will be granted.
If only I could!
I know someone who visits Dubai regularly, that's where she picks up her BC because it's the same stuff she gets at home, OTC and dirt cheap. They also sell ibuprofen 800mg there without a prescription (the horror!)
They also sell ibuprofen 800mg there without a prescription (the horror!)
That's four 200mg ibu's OTC. Any person can buy that at any time in the USA. Are the USA's math skills that poor?
Probably. Even if it isn't the FDA certainly believes that it is.
I'm desperately trying to find the bit from Coupling where Jane says she's decided to end it and has overdosed on paracetamol, when they ask how much she's taken she says "two, the bottle says not to take more than two every four hours"
At the root of this entire thing is that the Federalistas have stuck their all-knowing noses into this issue and created a problem where none needed to be.
Make OTC or make it a choice for anyone. A real, fucking choice, not some tarted up Rube Goldberg system of insurance coverage.
And fuck their free ponies, figuratively speaking.
Alright, "subsidize their sex lives."
Just about the only thing I want the government to subsidize is birth control. 13 generations of idiots is enough.
THIS.
Anything that discourages the stupid from breeding is worth it in my book. Yes, I will turn in my LP card, but seriously... the world is a better place with less children being raised by Jezzies, right?
Anything that discourages the stupid from breeding is worth it in my book.
Define "stupid".
Define "stupid".
Anyone who lacks the foresight to use birth control when they don't want a child.
These seem to be mutually exclusive statements.
If they lack the foresight to use BC, why would this lack of foresight change should BC be subsidized? Unless, of course, you forced them to use BC.....
These seem to be mutually exclusive statements.
Yeah, I guess they are. I still have no objection to subsidizing it and still think it will cut down on the amount of idiots. Or at least the amount of moochers.
Anyone who thinks differently from ME!
Define "ME" then
The person I am and everyone else isn't.
They seem to be self-weeding out, no? I mean, they don't much care for men, and if they find the right beta, he won't exactly push for kids, would he?
Do men have to push? I thought the point of these women was they wanted a really fancy doll and just needed some poor sap to give it to them. And then pay for it forever.
They'll let the beta raise the kids they make with an alpha.
What do the gammas and deltas do?
nicole,
The fellas here call Fluke a slut and a cunt and other endearing names because she is an ideological enemy, and that's the most clever way they can think of to insult her. By attacking not her ideas, but her personally. Hope this helps.
There might be something to that except for the fact that those people who did try to make arguments based on ideology and economics were still accused of calling her a slut, denying access to birth control and generally making war on women.
Personally, I like the theory that is a giveaway to the unions. Universal Mandatory daycare = unionized daycare.
That's the wrong picture. You gotta use the one where she points an AK of some kind at the crowd of media, with her finger on the trigger, and no one in the room freaks out even a little bit.
But I'm the ignorant one.
http://tinyurl.com/azbxl6p
Image from one of the more odious Facebook political groups I have ever seen. Tell me again which State of the Union address took a hard line stance against unwarranted drone-based execution?
Sorry about that. Let me see if I can find it again.
http://tinyurl.com/bc2uspf
There it is.
Is that from the Tea Party is full of racists and we hate them all because arrrrrrrrRRRgRGGGHH!!!! group?
Well, I guess talk of liberty and limited government would seem like a foriegn language to those idiots.
Of course hardcore lefties refuse to hear what libertarians have to say, they'd have to confront the evil of their own ideology.
Small businesses nearing the 50-employee threshold that triggers many Obamacare regulations actively consider whether to curb their own growth.
A local talk show has recently had many small business owners calling in about how they're planning to lay off employees, cut locations, or call it quits due to Obamacare. Let the good times roll!
"Let me be clear, we will support small businesses by ensuring they remain small."
Australian Customs wants its staff to dob in colleagues who are seen smoking marijuana at parties outside work, leaked internal documents reveal.
Customs and Border Protection workers have been told that under the new ''mandatory reporting'' regime, they will be expected to report on their colleagues' behaviour inside and outside of work.
more
"dob in"? Is that some sort of Ozzie slang?
Oh, I suppose it is. "Dobber" (ie someone who informs authority of another's wrongdoing) used to be a serious insult at school. Plenty of people still do see dobbing as a bit of a mongrel act. There was a minor Sydney crook some years ago who got shot. His last words were to the cops asking who shot him: "Get fucked." Even the guys who shot him thought he was a good bloke for staying staunch on his deathbed.
we spell it Aussie, BTW
Snitches get stitches. Y'heard?
Curse you and your quickness!
Holy shit, that is fucking hilarious. Sounds like Australia's version of "snitches get stitches".
So, the Aussie equivalent of "nark", I guess?
Dob in means to rat out?
"Dob" is the common name for the Australian Flying Spider.
Ummmm....
Australia is still an island, yeah?
Those Kiwis have canoes!
Yeah, what, did the sharks go on strike?
Border Protection on an island?
i think we consider the limit of our territorial waters to be a border
I'll never forgive you fuckers for what you did to little Nemo and his friends.
You never know what could swim ashore, jump off a boat or fly in, eh?
Unless it's more poisonous than the natives, it won't last long.
In Oz, its probably poisonous or considers human flesh tasty.
If only Australia was surrounded by some sort of moat filled with dangerous creatures.
It's not much of a deterrent, frankly. We live in a region with a lot of people who want a better life, and some of them pay people smugglers to put them on small, dangerous boats that travel thousands of miles through dangerous waters. And quite a few sink. Some are discovered by the Navy or Customs and rescued, but unknown numbers die.
So you're like the Florida of the Pacific.
Florida with pub rock, yes
So you finally got pub rock 40 years after it started in the UK? Good on ya.
Found a song about Australian Irish pubs.
Small businesses nearing the 50-employee threshold that triggers many Obamacare regulations actively consider whether to curb their own growth.
It was my understanding that the mandates set to take effect in 2014 would be based on the number of employees at the end of 2012 - if you have slightly over 50 employees, it's too late now to get rid of a few with the idea that you're going to avoid the mandates. And I also believe that the 50 employee rule applies to full-time equivalents - having 100 part-time employees isn't going to save you either.
But it seems to me there might be a business opportunity for setting up some sort of employee exchange - coordinating the hiring and scheduling for employees working two part-time jobs for two different employers. Since neither McDonalds nor Burger King are going to be eager to hire full-time employees, an employee exchange would be the way for them to both hire the same worker for part-time employment.
The way they will get around this is by "outsourcing" different departments of small companies, I think. For instance, if you own Widget Industries, you will now form another company called Widget Accounting, and move all your accounting there. Then, you corp-to-corp your money between them.
At least I hope this works.
Yeah, I figure that, for example, a resturanteur (sp?) will incorporate his two locations as entirely different entities.
Then we finally go full Atlas Shrugged when they pass a law saying one man can own one company, no more.
Go a step further than that.
Incorporate a Kitchen Business and a Hospitality business. The Kitchen business is the back of house, the hospitality business is the front of house. The Hospitality buiness contracts with the kitchen business to provide food to order for it's customers and rents them the physical space in the back of their restaurant.
Use only contractors?
Doesn't work in MA, at least. Contractors have to be able to spend 20% of their time off-site and are required to receive health insurance.
there might be a business opportunity for setting up some sort of employee exchange
Saving *and* creating jobs!
They'll be chasing this with ever more baroque regulations, mark my words. They'll be aggregating affiliates, dropping the minimum number of employees, reclassifying contractors, you name it.
Good times for the lawyers, at least.
OT: Reasonoids, I need your help.
Since it is V-Day in the USA (Valentine's Day is not a holiday in UKR), I decided to buy Dr. PG a "Promise Ring" (0.25 carat, princess cut, silver) and I need suggestions on how to present it to her tonight. (She likes bling and I called her fave jeweler for her ring size, unbeknownst to her).
I also have decided to buy an engagement ring (0.5 carat solitaire, gold) for later in the year, if things go swimmingly (if she says "NET!" then gems hold value well).
If she accepts my proposal, then I will buy the Groovy Hope Diamond (1 carat emerald, platinum) for a wedding (same rationale applies if things go south).
I'm weird and have always had fixation with "3" and a few other prime numbers.
Should I hide it in her fave food? In a box of candy? On a tiger lily (her fave flower?)
This is so sweet.
It really depends on her personality. Does she like being the center of attention or does she get embarrassed by it? Is she an introvert or an extrovert? Does she like surprises or hate them? Does she like getting presents or dislike being fussed over?
Her personality is well, Russian (big help, I know.)
She likes being the centre of attention, but also blushes easily. Introvert, but SOD help you if you piss her off. Loves (pleasant) surprises. She LOVES gifts, but not all the time (she has her own money). She loves compliments, but has an excellent bullshit detector.
Hang it from your piecred scrotum, that'll surprise her.
Give it to her in private. Cook her dinner, ply her with wine so she's pleasantly buzzed, and present it to her in lieu of desert.
Then take her out to a movie/theater/ballet so that she gets to show off her new present.
Done.
You're replying to the scrotum thing, right?
I think that sounds right. Hiding it in food always seems like asking for trouble. Hiding it anywhere has the potential to go awry. AN unexpected presentation will be quite a pleasant surprise on its own, I am sure.
Half the fun of food-hidden gifts is the sorting it out from the fecal material, later in the evening.
To each his own, I suppose.
Hiding it in her food sounds like a good idea until she eats the ring. Just give it to her like a regular gift and save the extra romantic stuff for the actual engagement ring.
nothing a little home surgery can't cure.
Just in a box tiger lily in food.
Goddamned greater than-eating website.
I just thought you were waxing poetic.
Are you going out to dinner/making nice dinner at home or some such? Honestly I would just give it in a box. A nice box of course. It depends on her personality of course but all the "hiding" type things always seem to me like they have too much potential to go wrong, and you know if you get a little box it's not going to go wrong...
I say go with what the chick says. Chicks know about this sappy bullshit.
My Valentine's plans are slightly less romantic.
Doggy style and a bottle of Jack?
Ha please. I borrowed a massage table and I got some anal lube. Boldly going where no man has gone before.
Virginian, I can help with this as well.
What you want to hold her down or something?
My Valentine's plans are slightly less romantic.
So are mine. I think I'm gonna kill a duck, brine it for 10 hours and cook it for my wife. Oh, and I think I'm gonna try and make another baby later tonight since my parents are leaving today and heading to my sister's house.
agree with nicole. Don't be coy Doc - hand her the box with some choice words of love. She'll swoon, and that's what you want, no?
Done.
You're still talking about the scrotum thing, right?
I'm sure he's hoping to get a little box, if you know what I mean.
Diamonds - She'll pretty much have to.
That's what every Kay Jeweler commercial in the last decade has led men to believe.
Yes, but I have only one shot to do this, and I don't want to be all "Your Doing it Wrong!" and possibly, "Good Job Breaking it Hero!"
Are you going out to dinner/making nice dinner at home or some such?
Going out to her fave eatery tomorrow. She's getting flowers, perfume, and candy tonight.
There is no wrong way to present jewelry.
Giving it to your mistress instead of your wife seems to end badly.
The mistress would think it's pretty neat, though.
Is that a challenge?
Cause I bet I could come up with one. 🙂
Swallowing it and pooping it out and presenting your mate with a pile o' poop to rummage through, perhaps.
Oh I was thinking more along the lines of handing it to her wrapped up in a Positive STD test result
What KK said. Do not over analyze this.
Listen to the chicks, it's the safest route.
Done. She gets the ring in a box tonight with all the other goodies. She can show it off tomorrow.
THANK YOU ALL!-D
I would go the flower route, Doc.
Don't want a chipped tooth or a choking episode to ruin the evening.
I'm weird and have always had fixation with "3"
Ever read Clarke's Rendezvous with Rama?
Bottom of a bottle of vodka? She'll get there eventually, amirite?
Too dangerous (for me). Ever try to outdrink a Russian?
I'm mostly Irish, I've tried to outdrink nearly everyone. Far more success most Indians (dots and feathers), Asians, and Semitics than Eastern Europeans.
Ever try to outdrink a Russian?
No, because Im not stupid.
Well, not THAT stupid.
Sheeeeeit.
All the Russians I've met turn into maudlin, angry babies after a few beers and shots. I think they like to drink salty tears more than vodka.
All Russians aren't created equal. Ever seen Siberians drink?
I used to work in a bar across the street from a hotel and we'd get russians all the time (don't know why) and they'd always make a goddamn mess of themselves. Sure, they'd drink a bit more than the average customer, but then they'd lose all composure. This happened all the time.
The Arabs that I know can drink all goddamn day, but they eat like 23 meals a day when they drink. Every goddamn 5 minutes new food comes out, they cook and eat like it's their job.
Irish guys can usually drink a good amount and stay cool. English dudes, too.
And I know one mongolian dude, and he can drink enough to kill a horse. He says his whole family drinks like that.
I guarantee you this little devushka, all of 1.52m and 37kg, can kick your ass with no problem, cap l.-) Drinking, chess, chemistry, your frick and frack...
English units when speaking to us heathens, please. I'm an oil industry engineer, and we're still using a proper system, not a rational one.
Groov, every dude in the world knows some little lady that can drink all the men under the table, but I've yet to see it happen in real life, so excuse my skepticism.
My girlfriend used to say she could drink anyone under the table as well, and she could for the average drinker. But for me and my friends that's just keeping up.
5 ft even and 80lbs? She didn't look like an 11 year old gymnast.
I know her real weight, but she's vain,-) She's tiny, I assure you. (ahem, add 10kg)
I thought she was an attractive woman and you were obviously being a gentleman and giving an unrealistic number so we'd say things like that.
Wait, she's 5'1" and 81 friggin pounds?
That is like concentration camp survivor level skinny.
Hell my 10 year old son who is 4'6 and weighs 75 lbs is too damn skinny
2 words: Flash Mob
Tell her it's her turn to play "proctologist" in the bedroom tonight, then hide it up there. Chicks love that. Maybe spray some cologne back there before the special moment.
We don't talk shop outside of work, cap l.-)
Non-medical people play "doctor". I suppose medical people play "patient". HA!
Hey, my plan gets that ring on her finger in a unique way.
It's a good plan.
PASS! (See what I did there?)
PASS! (See what I did there?)
Don't do that.
You don't wanna have to fish the thing out of the toilet. Just hold it, man.
Is there any way you could contact Ke$ha, cause I have the perfect idea.
Lemme know.
Do you have a shotgun?
Benelli Super Sport II*
*H/T Episiarch.
Nevermind, you are still in love.
she has her own jeweler?
*barf*
I do, however, like your marketing plan. With each step closer to oblivion, you offer a more valuable toaster. Nice job. Very capitalistic of you.
Can we please stop acting like the Sandra Fluke debacle had anything to do with promiscuity other than the retarded interjections of Rush Limbaugh? Christ.
First you whine about Kesha's pee, then this.
Your cosmotarian nannying sickens me.
What is this about Ke$ha's pee? Please, tell me more.
Small businesses nearing the 50-employee threshold that triggers many Obamacare regulations actively consider whether to curb their own growth.
This morning on Bloombe4g they were breathlessly nattering about Billionaire Warren Buffet's deal to buy Heinz. Somebody said something the rich getting richer in the context of large megacorps doing fine while mid to small businesses stagnate, and asked "How do you explain this?". This elicited a brief, awkward, interlude of confusion and staring off into the middle distance.
Then they excitedly talked about the merger between AMR and USAIR.
In the Bloomberg world, the only "real" corporations are those listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ. Those other corporations, like my Dad's medical practice, my wife's accounting firm, my friend's restaurant, and my other friend's printing shop don't really count. Things like Obamacare, and excessive regulation never cause them problems. At least according to Bloomberg.
Side note Brooksie: I don't watch Bloomberg TV anymore. Listen to Bloomberg radio instead. Better hosts, more diverse guests, and better talk on economics/finance/investing. Bloomberg TV is just another corporate/government media outlet.
Oh goodie. I can't wait to see what ugly-ass livery they come out with when that happens.
Already done. Not bad, IMO.
http://s1.ibtimes.com/sites/ww.....ange_4.jpg
From the link about Rubio vs. Paul:
Paul, clearly not trying to win an election, condemned the president for having a secret list of people to be killed without a trial.
In what twisted mindset is a Republican appealing to the pissed-off pro-civil-liberties portion of the Democratic base "not trying to win an election"?
The mindset of those who realize there simply is no pissed-off pro-civil-liberties portion of the Democratic base with whom to lodge a rational and reasoned appeal.
Oh, he may be trying to win an election, but getting a partisan cultist to come over to the dark side by challenging their most basic beliefs isn't going to move the needle.
From the mindset that actually believes that the left is "better" about civil liberties.
The part where he thinks that the Democratic base actually gives a shit about civil liberties. The Democratic base is composed of people who make their living off the government. This includes welfare cases, anyone who works in education, the rest of the government employees, and people who work for nonprofits or other recipients of government funding.
The people who are self sufficent, net contributors to the treasury and who also vote Democrat is a very small slice of people, and they will be easily kept in line with "Rand Paul hates the Civil Rights Act!" type stories.
Oh snap! I think you got your answer prolefeed. 🙂
Yeah we kinda dogpiled there. Just had a crazy thought: Rand Paul/Ron Wyden ticket.
Would you vote for a president Wyden with Rand as VP? I'm not so sure. Maybe, but not for certain.
No, Wyden would have to be VP. He's an outright socialist, so my hope is that 8 years of Randonomics will bring him around on that front.
Right but he would still have to get a bill on his desk before he could sign it. And Congress is not going to pass much socialist legislation when it's split. And he would tamp down the authoritarian attack on bill o' rights by threatening a veto.
But Rand would do the same thing.
Exactly. It's the same w/ Rand. Congress is not going to present him with stuff straight from his agenda. He would no doubt veto more stuff than Wyden and would be better but I'd possibly still vote for Wyden if Wyden/Rand was a choice.
Rand could do a lot from the Oval Office. Hell, pardoning every single guy in prison for victim less crimes would be a day one thing.
Actually, the economy is pretty crappy all across the Eurozone.
It's the fault of all those right-wingers, who as we know control everything in the Eurozone.
Here's actually a pretty light post (by my standards) on the double-standard.
Administrators not sure if police officer will be charged for running red light and slamming into another car because his victim was driving without a license. That man, by the way, has already been charged with multiple offenses.
Typically only one party in an accident is charged with anything, even if they both broke the law. Makes it easier for the insurance companies.
Lomax was cited on charges of driving on a revoked license, having no proof of insurance and violation of the state registration law
No failing-to-yield so there's hope.
What's in it for the cops? Not having to answer questions from insurance companies?
In the one accident I was in serious enough to have police involved, I think everyone got a ticket (mine was bogus and got thrown out after talking to some guy at the courthouse for about 10 seconds).
What's in it for the cops?
I dunno, but that's what the cop told me when he gave me a DUI after someone ran a red light and hit me while I was on my bicycle, leaving me unconscious in the middle of the road.
Then again he was probably lying. After all, his lips were moving and that's usually a good sign that a cop is telling a lie.
This kind of shit is worse in a way. Because when a cop kills someone, I can see how there is an incentive to think "Bob's a nice guy, he plays on the department softball team with me, our families had that cookout, he must have really thought he had to shoot. I can tell he feels terrible. It's done, putting him in jail won't bring that kid back" Very easy to rationalize.
But this kind of shit....he ran a red light. It happens. Give him a suspension, pay the damages to the guy you hit, and let everyone get on with life. But they can't admit even the most minor fault.
Last year I noticed a police cruiser didn't have functional brake lights. I noted the plate number and called it in when I got home. I didn't want to give the cop the opportunity to assault or murder someone for rear ending him.
I called Florida Highway Patrol because there was a broken box spring (wooden frame) blocking a lane on a major intersection. The person had to ask me at least 5 times which lane it was in, what the object was, in which direction of the road it was going, what lane it was in, what the object was, and what lane it was in.
Then at the end of all that, he asked "Can I have your name?" and I said "Do I have to give it?". When he said no I hung up.
Protip: next time that happens, call the radio station or TV station and tell them. The cops get almost all of their traffic info from them and you will not have registered a call to 911.
I don't watch Bloomberg TV anymore. Listen to Bloomberg radio instead. Better hosts, more diverse guests, and better talk on economics/finance/investing.
If I had Bloomies radio on my DISH/XM package, I might try it. I like "Surveillance" which comes on early. Tom Keane(?) definitely qualifies as well above average, as teevee business hosts go.
I have reached the point where I have to change the channel when the obnoxious blabbering redhead comes on.
Download the Bloomberg app on your smartphone. Tom Keene is superb. The redhead is a disgusting, little, government authority-worshipping, liberal twat.
Robc-
What do you recommend for adding citrus flavor to a wheat? My plan's to add 16oz of blood orange to a wheat beer in the 5 gallon primary so the fruit sugars ferment then and not later in the bottle. I've read this will lose that acidic bite.
Thoughts?
The only homework I've done is read this.
I'd use a hop with citrus notes. Cascade and Amarillo immediately come to mind. If I was to add fruit I'd do it in the secondary.
I'm hardly an expert, but it seems to me that you'd have better luck with peel than the fruit.
A friend of mine will squeeze a lemon into the secondary and then drop the two halves right in behind the juice.
The only fruit I've ever added was blueberries, and it came out great. Then a month later the bottles turned into gushers. Good thing it was only a gallon batch so I didn't lose much.
Gusher? Additional fermentation from the blueberry sugar?
Gusher as in an infection that causes the beer to gush foam as soon as it is opened. Dead giveaway of an infection is a ring in the bottle at the liquid level that you can see when you hold it to the light.
That or unfermented sugar that didnt quite reach bottle bomb stage.
It's a 10 gallon batch with Cascade. Half will be straight-up. The other half is experimental so I'm thinking citrus fruit.
I'd say add it to the secondary. The yeast will eat the sugar. However there is a real danger of adding an infection. The reason you add things like this to the secondary is that the alcohol content will lessen the chance of an infection, but it won't eliminate it entirely.
Perhaps treat the juice with a Campden tablet or pasteurize it to be on the safe side.
I was going to boil it right before adding it but going with the secondary sounds like a good cautious measure. Thanks for the input.
Ive never boiled my fruit before adding to secondary, but yeah, there is technically a chance of infection from that. Not much though, and if it does happen, maybe it will be a GOOD infection.
Not there yet with sours and intentional infections but in a year or so I may poke you guys for some lambic advice.
Ive never done one.
Once I get the pro brewery up and running, I might experiment with some sours with my home equipment.
What's your timeframe for going pro?
It will happen this year. As soon as I can make it.
Im hoping to be fully funded before the end of February, but Im not sure that is going to happen. Im getting close to my "point of no return" target number though, in which its enough to commit without being fully funded. That I will hit this month (I hope).
Awesome! Where are you?
Still in KY, last I checked.
Well good luck. I don't much about the craft market in Kentucky. Virginia's raging but not quite saturated.
http://beerpulse.com/2012/05/v.....breweries/
First, before I answer, what yeast are you using. If you answer something like WY1056/WLP001/Chico yeast, I refuse to answer on general principle.
If you are using a hefeweizen yeast, or a belgian wit yeast, or something with similar character, then I would recommend orange peel instead of the actual orange.
The orange peel would need to be added late in the boil.
If you are past that, adding the fruit to secondary is the best bet. Not sure how much citrus you will get though.
WY3068.
And you add the rind to the boil?
Yes, I add it with 5 minutes to go in the boil.
It wont give a huge flavor, but a nice subtle compliment to the banana esters that the yeast throws off.
I use WLP300, which is the same strain.
Thats a great, great yeast.
Download the Bloomberg app on your smartphone.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Seriously; I have the dumbest phone I could find.
The redhead would probably go down on Tim Geithner in the middle of Times Square on a Friday night. She loves her some fancypants overpaid investment bankers, too.
Color the Chron surprised!
"Ex-cops like Dorner may own banned guns"
"Taking on the issue would mean challenging the politically powerful police lobby..."
Heavens! Won't you think of the chilluns?!
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/ar.....277196.php
"Taking on the issue would mean challenging the politically powerful police lobby..."
They're public servants. It's not like they'd attempt to wield some sort of disproportionate political influence to shape legislation for the benefit of their member class.
What part of "Protect and Serve" don't you get?
http://www.theatlantic.com/sex.....em/273106/
Occupy Wall Street is now going after the exploitation of little rich girls in Manhattan. Notice, it is perfectly okay for universities to charge these women hundreds of thousands of dollars for worthless degrees. But it is the height of evil for Vogue to give them work experience and a start on a career for free.
I dont get unpaid internships. Ive never understood how the media/advertising/etc industries get away with it.
Try it in engineering and watch yourself get laughed at.
That is because engineering jobs are hard and kind of suck and there are not that many people who are actually qualified to do them. A job at a fashion magazine is really fun. And there are thousands and thousands of attractive, moderately intelligent young women who are qualified to work for them.
And one other thing Rob. If an engineering firm offered to let you work for them for free in lieu of college, would you be more interested in such? I would.
Sure. Its pretty much what happens with grad school. They pay you to go to school and you work as a teaching/research assistant.
And I knew plenty of people who did that undergrad, they were called co-ops. Technically they got paid, then they paid for school, but it worked out the same way. And they had experience when they graduated.
Its foreign to lawyers that someone would pay you to get an advanced degree. It makes them want to sue someone.
If you have to pay for grad school, I think you have to consider that you are being scammed.
Not if you are a doctor or up until five years ago a lawyer. Those fields used to provide guaranteed good paying jobs. That is worth paying for. I don't think I got scammed by my law school, although if I were attending today I would.
Yeah. Drexal has a really good program like that. The thing is for business like media and law, college is a complete waste of time. People ought to do unpaid internships and be trained that way rather than going to college.
And essentially, that is what a job at a place like Vogue is. It is just a graduate school for people who want to be in that industry.
Haha. Just a second ago got a IM from the gf. "Sorry I've been such a bitch this morning. The flowers are awesome!"
Freely translated into man language: "All of my coworkers are jealous and that is way more important than thinking the youtube videos I send you are stupid."
Yup. Women love nothing better than to lord such things over their single or unattached coworkers. For them, flowers from a man is like a man getting a deer head stuffed and mounted to show to his friends.
This is why I hate Valentines Day. It seems the day is less about celebrating romance than it is going out of your way to make single people feel like shit.
I agree.
A buddy of mine actually called it "Make Single People Feel Like Crap Day."
Eh. I don't give a fuck. She, and pretty much every other working woman I've known who is less than 5 years in a relationship want roses delivered to their work. Full stop. My objective is to make her happy, regardless of how ridiculous it seems to me. If she wanted the overpriced prix fixe meal at a mediocre restaurant, I'd grit my teeth, try to make it look like a smile, and do that for her.
Do I think women are crazy for taking pleasure in other women's jealousy? Yeah. Am I going to fight natural selection on it? Nope.
Eh. Why don't you LiveJournal about it.