Nick Gillespie: Can We Survive Sequestration Cuts to Defense Spending?
If planned sequestration cuts go through - and an increasing number of analysts think that's likely - the base budget for Defense will take a 9 percent hit. For folks such as Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), such a spectacle is too horrible to consider. "I'm ashamed of the Congress, I'm ashamed of the president, and I'm ashamed of being in [the Senate]," Graham told the Washington Post.
But Graham should chill out, says Nick Gillespie. Defense spending is up more than 70 percent in real terms since 2001 and the U.S. spends about five times more on national security than the next-closest country. In fact, the U.S. spent $928 billion on security in 2012. If we can't military spending now - with two wars winding down and a mounting pile of debt - we don't really have a society worth fighting for anyway.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?