Athletes on Attack Over Oppressive Olympics Endorsement Restrictions
Rule forbids competitors to promote sponsors who aren't officially connected to the games.
Nike raised eyebrows last week when it commenced a not-so-subtle guerrilla marketing campaign that poked fun not just at the Olympics, where it is not advertising, but also Adidas, its rival that paid tens of millions of dollars to be an official sponsor at the London Games.
Now, some of Nike's biggest track and field stars are complaining about rules that limit their ability to promote the companies that help them pay their bills. On Sunday, Sanya Richards-Ross, Nick Symmonds and other Olympians who are sponsored by Nike took to Twitter to criticize Rule 40, an International Olympic Committee regulation that prevents athletes from advertising for non-Olympic sponsors just before and during the Games.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?