Friday Funnies
Paying for services
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't get it. Why is Hillary Clinton holding a giant greeting card with a GSA factoid on it? And what does the SS guy stiffing a hooker have to do with spending money on a clown?
And why does she have a piece of paper stuck to this side of her head?
That's actually Elizabeth Warren. Hillary doesn't wear glasses; she's afraid they make her look dated and dowdy.
Too late.
Why isn't the dog labelled "American Public"? I'm disappointed.
Ha, nice.
Never mind that, where are the cops that shot it?
That Russian spy is trying to deflect attention away from the Russian spy angle Sen. Grassley so expertly figured out. Her ushanka gives her away, though.
Better ideas for a Friday Funny cartoon, please.
I'll kick off - how about joking that the Secret Service hi-jinks with whores are a form of foreign aid
No, IFH, they're GIVING the whores Foreign AIDS.
"Oh, you mean assistants!"
ass-istants
fify...
"Hey, 47 bucks and a Ted Nugent autograph."
"Stiffed a hooker." Ribald. Bok decides to work blue.
I would be willing to pay quite a bit for a mind reading Columbian hooker.
How much? More than $47, presumably. As much as $3200? Or more, since she's multitasking
$32. It's COLOMBIA, MAN! El Cheapo labor-o, muy bueno!
Your pitiful espan?l earns you a deserved cock block.
I'm not sure someone who can't spell espa?ol should be making such a comment.
Aw, la mierda! Tiene razon; huevo en la cara. (ocultos lejos en desconcierto)
Uh, TMI. And I don't want to know whose balls.
Mein Hodensack eine gro?e Rolle spielt.
I'm assuming she'd be able to tell how much I'd be willing to pay and for what. Asymmetrical Information at it's best. Or worst. Hard to call until the morning.
Also, this is horrible.
And the sky is blue. And the sun rose in the East this morning. And the government is fucking us as we speak. And LeBron James is somewhere, choking.
IOW, the usual.
Happy Friday, Reasonoids. HERC, I MISS U, BRO!
I like the status quo WRT Friday Funnies; otherwise, I would stroke out the minute a funny occurred.
http://www.isidewith.com/presi.....ction-quiz
I ran across the easiest Libertarian purity test of all time. Its short too.
I side with Gary Johnson first on it - Romney dead last.
Apparently I'm a Wrights/Johnson/Paul guy, with Obama in dead last by a decent margin.
Nice site, thanks for the link.
Due to the skewed nature of the questions, I ended up with 93% support for Ron Paul and 92% Libertarian overall. I think Ron is probably the best person to get into office this time around but I don't know that I'd consider myself that Libertarian. Some of those questions don't allow for what I would actually answer.
I actually thought the answers to chose from (usually under the 'other' section) were pretty good. There was actually a bit of nuance for a poll thingy.
Which questions didn't have answers that you would aver?
Stem cell research was Yes/No, federal funds to public schools was Yes/No, tax cut extension was Yes/No, offshore drilling was Yes/No. Those are a few.
There was a button that brought up more choices.
For stem cells I chose this one:
No, allow the private sector to explore potential benefits
Public schools had a get the fed out of schools option, that I chose.
The bank bailout question actually had a Paulian gold-bugger response (I chose that one).
The drug legalization one had a good choice to free all people in prison on drug charges in addition to legalization, put me down for that.
Apparently NoScript blocked that out. After retaking I ended with:
Paul: 97%
Wrights: 90%
Johnson: 84%
I'm voting for Johnson, or maybe I'll write-in Paul.
I think Shikha is right. Maybe, just maybe (ok it's a wild longshot but a guy can dream) if the idiot in the White House keeps his job, and the idiot Republicans win control of Congress, when the entire edifice collapses in the next couple of years BOTH parties will rightly be blamed and then, maybe but still probably unlikely, the electorate will begin to get serious about holding these assholes accountable.
Now THIS is a Friday Funny. HAHAHAHA!!! Good one Restoras.
Paul - 96/Johnson - 94/Wrights - 93
Romney last amoung repubs, Obama last overall.
Libertarian - 95
Agree with Sparky that some of the questions didn't have the answers I would have picked.
I agree with the "Rent is Too Damn High" guy more than the sitting president.
Awesome.
He was 4th on my list with 73%.
How are you going to argue with THE RENT IS TOO DAMN HIGH? I mean unless you're a landlord then it's probably lower than you'd like.
If a bunch of emotionally charged or laughably vague questions count for anything, I'm with RP at 95%.
It's funny, because the GSA paid a mind reader $3,200.
a dirty mind is a terrible thing to waste...
I don't get it. The animal has the head of a dog but the body of a cat.
Hilarious.
Penny Arcade satirizes political cartooning and still manages to be funny.
Is "stiffed a hooker" some kind of pun?
Paul 91%
Wrights 87%
Johnson 76%
...
Obama 7%*
*I guess they're rating his immigration policy on his 2008 campaign instead of how he's governed. Otherwise, I'd have ended up at 0% for the piece of shit.
The things that I agreed with Obama in the poll were either unimportant things (evolution) or things he has lied about (lifting the Cuba Embargo, opening up off shore drilling.
Actually funny. Good work Bok.
Having said thay, you ruined my morning. I always build up bile and spleen in anticipation of the H&R Friday drawing, but now have nothing to rail against.
Finally, something: The SS guy did "stiff" the hooker FOR $47, but it appears he stiffed her OUT OF $753 dollars.
This attempt is closer to humor than any of the recent ones. I give this one a "D" for trying.
On that quiz:
RP: 97%
GJ: 90%
Not that it means anything.
$47 dollars?! That was either a really good deal or a really nasty-looking hooker... uh, not that I know anything about it
Why the hell is Joe Arpaio's reelection PAC running ads on H&R? Don't get me wrong, if they want to waste their money courting the handful of trolls on this site who don't think that guy is a worthless shitweasel, then go for it. It's just not a very good idea.
I love the passed out dog.
You know what we SHOULD have gotten for the GSA scandal? A comic about putting government officials into the same room as a mind reader.
" 'Key members of the GSA.' Key. The minds behind every government expenditure in the nation, and you put them in a room with a psychic."