Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: Taliban Takes Credit for Kabul Attacks, Egyptian Presidential Candidates Disqualified, Arctic Newest Venue for Military Buildups

Ed Krayewski | 4.16.2012 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • The Taliban is taking credit for coordinated attacks across Kabul this weekend.

  • Mubarak replacement Omar Suleiman and the Muslim Brotherhood's chief strategist Khairat el-Shater are among 10 presidential candidates disqualified by the election commission in Egypt.
  • David Axelrod says President Obama and the First Lady don't plan on sending the U.S. Treasury extra money despite paying a lower effective tax rate than his secretary.
  • Man uses physics to get out of $400 ticket.
  • The Arctic could be the newest setting for an old-fashioned military build-up.
  • Google's co-founder is worried about the future of the Internet, because of Facebook and Apple.

Do you want hot links and other Reason goodies delivered to your inbox twice a day? Sign up here for Reason's morning and afternoon news updates.

New on Reason.tv: "Food Trucks vs. The Establishment"

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Steve Chapman on Inching Toward War in Syria

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (360)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    The glaciers are growing! The glaciers are growing!

    Just don't tell Big Al.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci.....IGGER.html

    1. o3   13 years ago

      but not the artic ice caps which continue shrinking
      _

      As ice cap melts, militaries vie for Arctic edge By ERIC TALMADGE
      Associated Press

      YOKOSUKA, Japan (AP) -- To the world's military leaders, the debate over climate change is long over. They are preparing for a new kind of Cold War in the Arctic, anticipating that rising temperatures there will open up a treasure trove of resources, long-dreamed-of sea lanes and a slew of potential conflicts.

      Noting that the Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the globe, the U.S. Navy in 2009 announced a beefed-up Arctic Roadmap by its own task force on climate change that called for a three-stage strategy to increase readiness, build cooperative relations with Arctic nations and identify areas of potential conflict.

      Acknowledging the need to keep apace in the Arctic, the United States is pouring funds into figuring out what climate change will bring, and has been working closely with the scientific community to calibrate its response.

      http://ap.stripes.com/dynamic/.....6-03-38-52

      1. wareagle   13 years ago

        love the juxtaposition of the two posts above: glaciers getting larger? Proof of climate change. If glaciers were getting smaller? Still proof. And for some reason, I cannot see the negative in making available new resources and shipping lanes. Then again, the climate change fanatics are always against anything that benefits man.

        1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

          Heads they win, tails you lose.

        2. T o n y   13 years ago

          Stabilizing the climate doesn't benefit man? You want to experiment with a climate shift unlike any seen in the history of the human species, just to open up new shipping lanes?

          1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

            $

          2. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

            Stabilizing the climate doesn't benefit man?

            So now your argument is that we should start fucking with the planet just for our own benefit?

            You want to experiment with a climate shift unlike any seen in the history of the human species

            You realize the Earth is 4.6 billion years old and the human species has only been around 200,000 years? Sounds like you're the one wanting to experiment with climate shift just because you don't agree with Mother Earth.

            1. fried wylie   13 years ago

              Sounds like you're the one wanting to experiment with climate shift just because you don't agree with Mother Earth.

              Bitch wont adhere to his Pan-Urban Plans, wtf?!

            2. T o n y   13 years ago

              I realize it's Monday morning, but could you try being a little coherent?

              Yeah what concerns me is the optimal climate for the human species. Particularly when the human species itself is responsible for major alternations, we ought to apply a modicum of precaution, don't you think?

              1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                $

              2. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

                Yeah what concerns me is the optimal climate for the human species. Particularly when the human species itself is responsible for major alternations, we ought to apply a modicum of precaution, don't you think?

                One could only wonder what the not-so-unintended consequences could possibly be.

                1. T o n y   13 years ago

                  Of precaution?

                  1. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

                    One more then I'm done with this lunacy.

                    Of precaution?

                    Yes Tony. Let's set the climate at exactly what is optimal for humans to survive. What could possibly go wrong?

                    1. T o n y   13 years ago

                      Let's continue altering the chemical makeup of the atmosphere unchecked... what could possibly go wrong?

                2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

                  One could only wonder what the not-so-unintended consequences could possibly be.

                  It's ironic how the precautionary principle ignores it's own consequences.

                  Just another fallacy for the fool to fellate.

                3. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                  Debating him is an exercise in futility. He won't do it in good faith. He is completely without reasoning abilities. And most importantly, he is a fucking immoral pig who rationalizes theft.

                  He is not worth more than a couple of keystrokes and two mouse clicks. So tony and I have set up a little code:

                  $ = FUCK YOU TONY, YOU IMMORAL FUCKING PIG!

                  Much less time consuming than attempting to reason with a doorknob.

                  1. T o n y   13 years ago

                    How am I lacking good faith? By not unquestioningly accepting the idiotic premises you acquired from the only book you ever read?

                    1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                      $

                    2. T o n y   13 years ago

                      I've read all of Ayn Rand's books and I don't recall them ever advocating being deliberately ignorant of scientific findings or doing unpaid shill work for rent-seeking industries.

                    3. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                      $

                  2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

                    $ = FUCK YOU TONY, YOU IMMORAL FUCKING PIG!

                    That works.

                    1. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

                      Agreed, I'm in.

                    2. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

                      Kill yourself, Tony. That way, you can prove you care about Mother Earth.

                    3. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

                      Or... just kill yourself. For the hell of it.

                      We promise we'd miss you for a handful of seconds.

      2. John Thacker   13 years ago

        There are better sources for the ice caps shrinking than the military coming up with plans to fight it.

        After all, would you believe that cybercrime is a huge deal just because the military has announced expensive plans to fight it?

    2. T o n y   13 years ago

      "The startling find has baffled scientists and comes at a time when glaciers in other parts of the region, and across the world, are shrinking."

      "A study of the neighbouring Himalayas in 2011 found the rate of ice loss in glaciers - which provide fresh water for around 1.3 billion people - has doubled since the 1980s."

      But those don't count.

      Your article gives a possible explanation (mass gain from avalanches). You're giddy with the possibility that your untenable position on the opposite side of science has merit, all by posting an article that clearly doesn't agree with your stance.

      This is confirmation bias. Or what libertarians call studying up.

      1. wareagle   13 years ago

        no Tony..mostly it means that a lot of us think politicians who think they can control weather/climate are full of shit. Nature is its own entity and operates irrespective of blowhard bureaucrats and paid-for scientists.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          Don't talk to it. Do you not see that it only wants responses and attention rather than honest discussion?

          1. T o n y   13 years ago

            What honest discussion could possibly be had when one interlocutor is a denier of scientific fact and has demonstrated ham-handed confirmation bias in order to maintain that position?

            Honest discussion is possible only after everyone agrees to basic precepts of logic and empirical standards.

            1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

              $

        2. o3   13 years ago

          yes auburn, nature, animals, & the US Navy does operate irrespective of deniers

        3. sarcasmic   13 years ago

          Please ignore the fallacy fellating master-baiter.

          1. o3   13 years ago

            stick to dailymail softporn at which ur adequate

            1. Randian   13 years ago

              Oh snap! Orrin with the sick burn!

            2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

              Some people consider that a public service.

        4. T o n y   13 years ago

          But not irrespective of changes in the chemical composition of the atmosphere.

          You're too dumb to realize it, but you're on the wrong side here.

          1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

            $

            1. T o n y   13 years ago

              Read another book.

              1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                $

                1. T o n y   13 years ago

                  OO=====D

      2. Anacreon   13 years ago

        Wait -- if the glaciers don't melt, how can they provide fresh water?

  2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Dude marries woman who can't talk, and she gets her voice back after thirty plus years. What a drag.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....-talk.html

    1. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

      So...the first she told him to do was to "Take out the Trash," right?

      1. Rich   13 years ago

        More probably: "We need to talk". 😉

        1. fried wylie   13 years ago

          to be fair, in a marriage, you should talk at least once, so your suggestion isn't that farfetched, Rich.

  3. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Chelsea Clinton is still a cow (John would fuck her).

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....iends.html

    1. kinnath   13 years ago

      What do you get when you cross a crooked politician with a lying lawyer?

      A daughter named.....

      1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

        Redundancy squared?

    2. creech   13 years ago

      That's no way to refer to our future kleptocratic president.

    3. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

      All those dudes look like complete tools/boy banders. But I don't expect First Daughter to actually hang out with real men.

    4. Pip   13 years ago

      Woof, woof!

    5. rac3rx   13 years ago

      Chip off the old block.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....tclub.html

  4. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Before Heelys there were these...

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....-feet.html

    1. Elspeth Flashman   13 years ago

      cool!

  5. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Youth continues to be wasted on the young.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....shoot.html

    1. Ice Nine   13 years ago

      And bikini tops continue to be wasted on Kendall Jenner.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

      How could you not link to this?

      ZILF?

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fem.....model.html

      1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

        easy

    3. fried wylie   13 years ago

      Hard to believe she's just 16! Kendall Jenner looks older than her years as she shows off her model shape in stunning bikini shoot

      In what way, shape, or form is that article acceptable according to societal norms and/or the laws that would slam down on me if I were to offer her a ride?

  6. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    My work is done.

    1. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

      Daily Mail needs pics of some hot guys for the ladeees.

      Also, Kendall Jenner isn't bad, but some of those pics were photoshopped in a horrific way.

      1. Elspeth Flashman   13 years ago

        I agree (about the Daily Mail.)

      2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

        They usually have something with that Beckham dude in some state of disrobing.

      3. AuH2O   13 years ago

        Here ya go:

        Usher

        1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

          thanks but... meh

          1. AuH2O   13 years ago

            Well, your choice from the first page is Usher, Prince Harry, Marky Mark, or Zac Efron.

            ...So, slim pickins.

            1. fried wylie   13 years ago

              Marky Mark, easy.

              ...erm, No Homo.

        2. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

          LOL. I Like how they have him juxtaposed with Justin Bieber further down, for a double dose of teh sexay.

          1. AuH2O   13 years ago

            Justin Bieber, with his complete lack of physique, is the epitome of Hipster Hot. In a few years, all the girls who like him will be going for dudes with ironic mustaches.

        3. Ramjet   13 years ago

          Uh, no.

          1. AuH2O   13 years ago

            Well, it's not my fault that there isn't a law forcing Jon Hamm to appear shirtless at least once a week, okay?

            1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

              and that's the problem with libertarianism right there

            2. Randian   13 years ago

              He'll fix your sink, though.

              1. Pip   13 years ago

                For some reason I read that as "He'll fix your stink, though."

                1. fried wylie   13 years ago

                  "He'll cure what smells ya."

  7. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

    France responds to England for locking up Babar.

    The source confirmed that if the gun was real, brandishing it in a public place is punishable by up to seven years' jail "for all parties involved." Even if it was fake, the maximum jail term is two years.

    "Certainly, if you were in a car and knew somebody was using a gun to warn people off, you'd be liable to arrest," the source said.

    1. Chupacabra   13 years ago

      Wait, what the fuck?

      Brandishing a fake gun can get you up to 2 years in jail?

    2. mr simple   13 years ago

      I keep thinking I'd like to visit France and then stories like this pop up and I think why would I go to such a high concentration of stupid? So she could be arrested because she was in the vicinity of a gun?

  8. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    Corzine Steals Billions Sans Charges, Errant Whale Watcher Faces Prison
    http://www.realclearmarkets.co.....99618.html

    Justice may be blind, but who works overtime to make it deaf, dumb, and stupid?

    Which would you imagine might attract more aggressive enforcement from the Justice Department: the theft of $1.2 billion from supposedly segregated customer brokerage funds, or lying about an alleged incident of whistling to attract the attention of a whale so that whale watchers could get a better peep? If you said the latter, then you appreciate the extent to which federal law enforcement priorities have run off the rails.

    1. shrike   13 years ago

      Corzine didn't steal a dime, you fucking moron. MFG had a long history of failing audits and losing money before he got there.

      1. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

        Corzine didn't steal a dime

        That's a bizarre thing to be absolutely certain about.

        1. Citizen Nothing   13 years ago

          Needz moar dymz.

          1. Rich   13 years ago

            Don't do the dymz if you can't do the tymz.

        2. shrike   13 years ago

          http://www.securitiestechnolog.....418-1.html

          From 2008-2010 they were fined repeated times for the same violations that brought them down. Corzine joined mid 2010. He was the sucker at the table.

          1. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

            If only Corzine could read, he might have known what was going on before he joined. Fucking MFG took advantage of the poor guy. There's no way he could possibly have joined to get a piece of the pie.

            1. NotSure   13 years ago

              So Shrike is saying this guy was utterly clueless about the company he joined (as CEO no less), had no idea what was going on when he was running the company and then did not tell the truth to what happened to the money after the bankruptcy.

              This would require Corzine to be clueless buffoon, how that makes this guy any more defendable does not work though.

              1. shrike   13 years ago

                He may be a clueless buffoon. Notice who pleaded the 5th? The longtime Treasurer/Checkwriter did.

                1. NotSure   13 years ago

                  So this clueless buffoon is praised by your master as being such a fiscal wiz, what does that make your master ?

                  Why you against Bush then, he is also not guilty like Corzine, he simply was a clueless bufoon as well.

                2. tarran   13 years ago

                  Because it's fucking impossible for more than one person to commit fraud when a giant corporation commits fraud.

                  Dude, you really are the king of non-sequiturs today.

                  1. Chupacabra   13 years ago

                    I'm sure shrike feels the same about Ken Lay and the rest of the Enron management team.

          2. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

            That sounds like a reason to avoid being certain he's a thief not a reason to declare he's not a thief.

      2. tarran   13 years ago

        John Gotti never extorted anyone, you fucking moron. The Castellano crime family had a history of having their enemies mysteriously end up dead long before he got there.

        1. plu1959   13 years ago

          ++

        2. o3   13 years ago

          nice conflation, properly cooked.

      3. Bardas Phocas   13 years ago

        John Wilkes Booth didn't shoot anyone, you fucking moron. Actors have a long history of firing pistols into the audience.

        1. AuH2O   13 years ago

          Stalin never committed genocide, you idiot. The Soviet Army had a long history of shooting random civilians.

        2. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

          http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....otout.html

          1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

            maybe they were varmints who needed shootin'

      4. Kwanzaa Cake   13 years ago

        Did he personally steal it? Probably not. Did customer accounts get emptied to fund MF expenses on Corzine's watch? YES. Are you really saying he should not be accountable for this? I'm with Schwab, personally, and if my account was emptied to fund Schwab's proprietary trading I would want to see a perp walk, stat.

        1. tarran   13 years ago

          Actually, Corzine ordered the transfer; he was buying government bonds at a discount from their holders betting that - thanks to bailouts - the bonds would be redeemed at full face value.

          When the governments announced they would not be paying pennies on the dollar - it became clear that MF had spent a large fortune purchasing a small fortune.

          Shrike is just jumping up and down shrieking that people should look elsewhere...

          1. shrike   13 years ago

            No, MFG's demise had been predicted.

            http://www.americanbanker.com/.....623-1.html

            Corzine finished them off. He deserves the full penalty which is a lifetime ban from the securities industry.

      5. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

        Hmm... shrike, defending criminal-minded Democrat fat-cat businessman.

        The sun must have come up this morning.

  9. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    The Titanic was a real ship? Women shouldn't be allowed to vote
    http://www.fivefeetoffury.com/.....d-to-vote/

    1. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

      Now now. Let's be fair here. These particular women shouldn't be allowed to vote.

      (GOD the stupid in those comments is just soul-crushing.)

      1. Ramjet   13 years ago

        Or reproduce.

        1. fried wylie   13 years ago

          Or let out of the kitchen.

    2. Abdul   13 years ago

      Okay, Titanic was real, but Schindler's List was still just a movie, right?

    3. Night Elf Mohawk   13 years ago

      Wait until they find out about Apollo 13.

      1. Bardas Phocas   13 years ago

        Or Road Warrior.

        1. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

          Or The Blair Witch Project.

          1. Rich   13 years ago

            Or Wag the Dog.

          2. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

            Or Capricorn One

          3. Dr. Frankenstein   13 years ago

            Or Planet of the Apes.

    4. Elspeth Flashman   13 years ago

      gaah!

    5. Brett L   13 years ago

      Facebook is a boundless stupidity reservoir? Who knew?

      1. PapayaSF   13 years ago

        Those are from Twitter, which makes Facebook look like a Mensa meeting.

  10. shrike   13 years ago

    Muslim Brotherhood's chief strategist Khairat el-Shater are among 10 presidential candidates disqualified by the election commission in Egypt.

    One of the many wingnuts here was just saying how the Muslim Bros were taking over in Egypt.

    1. Ice Nine   13 years ago

      Oh right, the Election Commission just ended their aspirations. Nothing a few well-placed bombs won't fix.

    2. wareagle   13 years ago

      oh please. They are the most organized group seeking Parliamentary seats. Not having one guy running for President hardly makes them impotent. After the MB has a a majority, you will look even more foolish. And by teh way, that will be exactly the outcome POTUS expected.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Mubarak replacement Omar Suleiman and the Muslim Brotherhood's chief strategist Khairat el-Shater are among 10 presidential candidates disqualified by the election commission in Egypt.

    All born in Kenya.

    1. Suki   13 years ago

      Well, that is pretty close to the way Maobama became a politician. Rezko connections should not be discounted.

  12. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    Events do not wait as Obama plays a delay defense
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....story.html

    Barack Obama's foreign policy strategy in this election year might be best summed up by William F. Buckley's famous promise: to "stand athwart history, yelling stop." Wherever war rages, crisis looms, or a truculent strongman glowers, the message from the White House has been the same: "Give me space."

    1. o3   13 years ago

      what's the message when u hate sum obama for intervening (libya) and NOT intervening? >oops - my bad, its a radio message acourse!

  13. Ice Nine   13 years ago

    They celebrate Tet in Afghanistan?

  14. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    Why Your Highway Has Potholes
    Americans don't want to live in Ray LaHood's car-free utopia.
    http://online.wsj.com/article/.....on_LEADTop

    The current scheme also creates giant inequities. Politically powerful cities get a big chunk of the money, while many Western and Southern states get less back than they pay in. But why should people in Akron, Ohio or Casper, Wyoming have to pay gas taxes to finance the New York subway or light rail in Denver? One reason there is so much overspending on inefficient urban transit is that federal matching dollars require residents in other states to foot up to half the bill.

    The best solution would be to return all the gas tax money to the states, roughly in proportion to the money each pays in. This would allow states and localities to determine which roads and transit projects they really need?and are willing to pay for. California could decide for itself if it wants more roads, whether it can afford high-speed rail, and whether it wants to use congestion-pricing on crowded roads. The House Transportation Committee has found that getting a permit for a new road costs twice as much, and takes three times as long, when federal money is included than when financed with private or local dollars.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

      Of course, the Feds could just stop collecting the gas tax and not involve themselves in the process at all.

      1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

        But then how could they blackmail states into passing laws if they didn't have federal highway funds to attach conditions to?

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

          I guess they could threaten them with DEA raids, since the roads are used for drug transportation. Yeah, that's the ticket!

          1. Elspeth Flashman   13 years ago

            that'd work, because commerce clause + necessary & proper clause = anything Congress wants!

            1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

              Don't forget general welfare.

              1. Elspeth Flashman   13 years ago

                I did forget, thanks for the reminder.

            2. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

              We'll see if political popularity is a necessary part of that equation in June, hopefully.

      2. Suki   13 years ago

        Of course, the Feds could just stop collecting the gas tax and not involve themselves in the process at all.

        Exactly, the best solution that never dawned on that writer.

    2. Rich   13 years ago

      LaHood has been pushing a strange "livability" agenda, which he defines as "being able to take your kids to school, go to work, see a doctor, drop by the grocery or post office, go out to dinner and a movie, and play with your kids in a park, all without having to get in your car."

      What is this "post office" to which LaHood refers?

      Also, I think he meant to say "without having to get *out of* your car".

      1. Night Elf Mohawk   13 years ago

        Maybe he should live somewhere where he can do that and stop trying to foist that crap on everyone else.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          Seriously, is America in danger of running out of room? Why the urgency to stack people on top of one another?

          1. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

            Because proper progressive people don't want to live in small western towns where, god forbid, some people might not agree with them on principle.

            1. Suki   13 years ago

              Until they get upset about "concrete canyons" and switch the whine against suburbs to the whine against cities.

          2. wareagle   13 years ago

            because people-stacking brings us one step closer to the realization of an American Europe. At least on the Continent, building upward is done by necessity; here it is apparently going to be legislated reality.

            1. Randian   13 years ago

              It isn't out of necessity that the Continent does it. It's because of the history of the cities, really. In the 1300 and 1400s, you had to have everything close by, and things have just sort of stayed that way. No such historical inertia exists in America, and it seems strange to try to impose history that isn't there in an effort to do some cargo-cult mimicry.

              1. T o n y   13 years ago

                In terms of how humans live, density = efficiency. Cities use less energy per capita than suburbs.

                1. Virginian   13 years ago

                  So?

                  1. T o n y   13 years ago

                    So it's not like suburban sprawl was created by a free and natural market--it was created by government policy (including those evil housing inducements).

                    I can think of many reasons, apart from energy efficiency, to promote more density, and none of them is a desire to look more like Europe (except insofar as Europe does things better than the US).

                    1. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

                      Tony w/spaces, you're the worst sockpuppet ever.

                    2. Joe M   13 years ago

                      So it's not like suburban sprawl was created by a free and natural market--it was created by government policy (including those evil housing inducements).

                      Government promoted a lifestyle which Tony doesn't like, so it was bad.

                      I can think of many reasons, apart from energy efficiency, to promote more density, and none of them is a desire to look more like Europe (except insofar as Europe does things better than the US).

                      Government is promoting a lifestyle which Tony does like, so it's good.

                      I'm sure you'll find no disagreement from most here that the government shouldn't have promoted sprawl, but it shouldn't be promoting density either. Make up your mind whether the market is good.

                    3. T o n y   13 years ago

                      Government is integral to any market. Any social order will be the result of both government policy and market forces. Your premises are faulty.

                    4. Joe M   13 years ago

                      So then stop complaining if the government promotes a lifestyle you disagree with, if you think it's allowed to do it.

                2. rac3rx   13 years ago

                  Well except normal people don't want to live like caged rats.

            2. JerseyPatriot   13 years ago

              The spreading in America is heavily reliant on govenrment regulation and subsidy. Zoning laws, expressways, and interstate highways all encourage spreading, and these don't exactly emerge from bottom-up Hayekian processes.

              1. Randian   13 years ago

                There is just as much evidence that density is sustained by inefficient government subsidies to transportation networks and other regulations and subsidies.

                What evidence do you have that the suburbs are entirely, or even mostly, a creation of government? You have a serious revealed preference problem, regardless of the cost differences.

                1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

                  So... should we be FORCED to live in cities?

                  Sure sounds like it.

                  1. T o n y   13 years ago

                    Encouraged. Just as government encouraged people to buy single-family homes and drive cars. The very least we could do is remove the subsidies and other inducements that promote that inefficient lifestyle. You can't disagree about that, except to the extent that (like most libertarians) you assume the status quo is the product of a free market.

                    1. PapayaSF   13 years ago

                      If you want more people to move to cities, just get rid of the idiot and corrupt Democrats who govern them.

                    2. T o n y   13 years ago

                      People should do whatever they want. Personally, the farther from the city I am the closer to hell I feel.

                      It would be nice if gun-toting idiots from rural areas stopped having such a disproportionate influence on national policy, though.

                  2. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

                    You know who else forced people to live in cities?

                    1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

                      Yeah... every gun owner is an idiot.

                      Fuckhead.

                      Then again, what else would one expect from Team Blue?

      2. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

        It sounds like he wants to go live in a mall, a la Dawn of the Dead.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          Those people got to shoot Jay Leno, drink, and hump each other.

          Not seeing the downside here.

          1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

            oh, the remake was worse than the original.

      3. Spoonman.   13 years ago

        I'm pretty sure it's less efficient for my wife and I to take the bus to the grocery store several times a week than to take the car once a week.

        And I could never go to Costco without a car, and I can't live without Costco.

      4. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

        being able to take your kids to school, go to work, see a doctor, drop by the grocery or post office, go out to dinner and a movie, and play with your kids in a park, all without having to get in your car.

        This is the fucking nightmare I live every day. Fuck you, LaHood.

    3. Brett L   13 years ago

      Keep the peasants in their home villages. Make it harder for them to travel and band together. Standard czarist tactics. Oh, wait, he's not that kind of Czar?

  15. Rich   13 years ago

    Before others try the "physics defense" in before a judge, Krioukov warned that it took a perfect combination of events for his argument to legitimately hold up.

    Don't be like that dude who tried the blueshift argument to get out of running a red light and was slapped with a big speeding ticket.

    1. Brandon   13 years ago

      It was a stop sign, and it worked.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Man uses physics to get out of $400 ticket.

    My high school physics teacher was wrong. It is useful in real life!

  17. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    A Veteran's Death, the Nation's Shame
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04.....l?_r=2&hp;

    In 1953, Joseph Stalin signed the plans for a top-secret nuclear submarine base that would become the operational home for the fearsome Soviet Black Sea Fleet.

    Hidden inside the base of a mountain in the port town of Balaklava on Ukraine's Crimean coast, the 153,000 square-foot facility took nine years to build and its entrance camouflaged from spy planes. It could survive a direct nuclear hit and at maximum capacity could hold 3,000 people with supplies to sustain them for a month. Best of all, the vast subs that slunk in and out of here between tours of duty could enter and leave underwater, keeping them from prying eyes at all times.

    Once the most sensitive and secretive of Soviet Cold War hotspots, today it is preserved as a museum. I manage to get special permission to drive into the base during the 8,000-mile Land Rover Journey of Discovery expedition to Beijing. We were the first to do so since the Soviet trucks and trailers that ferried in missiles, supplies and essentials over its 40 years of operation.

    1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

      whoops -

      veteran suicide story is here:
      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04.....l?_r=2&hp;

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

        Kristof is gunning for the position of National Concern Troll

    2. mr simple   13 years ago

      Didn't Anthony Bourdain visit that place a couple years back?

  18. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

    Man uses physics to get out of $400 ticket.

    And I was really eager to hear the science behind it. Not a very detailed article.

    1. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

      Reporter unable to use lack of physics to get out of article assignment.

      1. plu1959   13 years ago

        hehehe

    2. db   13 years ago

      Yeah, that was pretty poorly written.

    3. kinnath   13 years ago

      There was just enough there to look like total BS.

    4. Jerry   13 years ago

      He probably applied the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?

      1. o3   13 years ago

        heisenberg took to cooking meth

    5. Rich   13 years ago

      I was really eager to hear the science behind it.

      To be fair, DHS probably didn't permit such exposition.

    6. Gray Ghost   13 years ago

      Let's try this again.

      Here's the arxiv paper from the physicist, explaining why he was innocent of the 'California stop' ticket.

      1. Gray Ghost   13 years ago

        And this is a blog post, with the cliff's notes version of the professor's 4 page paper.

        1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          +1

          Though this basically boils down to "there was a car in the way so he couldn't see the actual stop".

  19. SugarFree   13 years ago

    Acamedia Strikes Again: Do Big-Box Stores Help Create Hate Groups? Study Says Yes

    The amount of Wal-Mart stores in a county was more statistically significant than other factors commonly regarded as important to hate group participation, such as the unemployment rate, high crime rates and low education, the research found.

    "Wal-Mart has clearly done good things in these communities, especially in terms of lowering prices," said Stephan Goetz, a Penn State University professor who also serves as the director of the Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development. "But there may be indirect costs that are not as obvious as other effects."

    1. tarran   13 years ago

      Don't you see, sugarfree, if Walmart unionized, like Target, then they wouldn't intrinsically promote right wing hate groups!

      1. Randian   13 years ago

        Target's not union. Did I miss some sarcasm somewhere?

        1. tarran   13 years ago

          No, for some reason I thought they were unionized. Whoops!

          1. Suki   13 years ago

            Walmart is from Arkansas founded by a small shopkeeper, Target was founded in Minnesota by a New York banker. It always goes back to jealous northerners upset at uppity Southerners.

    2. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

      such as the unemployment rate, high crime rates and low education, the research found.

      I imagine the good professor thinks Wal-Mart creates these things as well.

      1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

        unemployed poor people with high crime rates and low education don't ever need to buy anything - don't you know?

    3. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

      A key factor is that many local merchants are forced out of business after finding it difficult to compete against large retailers, according to the study.

      Local business owners are typically members of community and civic groups, such as the Kiwanis and Rotary clubs, which help establish programs promoting civic engagement and fostering community values. Goetz said losing members of such groups may cause a drop in community cohesion.

      Don't you see? You just CAN'T compete with Wal-Mart, it's utterly impossible. Wal-Mart is eating away the fabric of America the goddamn commies.

      1. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

        Then again, online retailers like Amazon are getting ready to rape Walmart (and the like) Guangzhou Gangbang style. Competition is possible, you just have to cut costs by getting rid of the unnecessary chaff that will eventually be maintaining the sex-robots of the future. What would you rather do? Greet people at Walmart and change out used-up robot vaginas? I think the choice is clear.

        1. Suki   13 years ago

          Still can't walk into Amazon and open a bank account, then walk down the aisle and buy fresh produce and shotgun shells.

      2. Kwanzaa Cake   13 years ago

        Wal-Mart's earnings and stock price have done next to nothing for about a decade. It seems to me that just maybe, it is not the invincible juggernaut some people think it is.

    4. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

      Fucking correlation /= causation, How does it work?

    5. Abdul   13 years ago

      Where else do you find "White Power" t-shirts in XXXXL?

      1. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

        Right next to the XXXXL Daisy Dukes.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

          Didn't need that image in my head

          1. Abdul   13 years ago

            Racism is seXXXXy!

          2. plu1959   13 years ago

            Then you will probably want to avoid this website.

    6. DJF   13 years ago

      """"The researchers suggest Wal-Mart use the study's data to determine strategies for supporting local groups that can foster stronger social and economic community ties.""'

      And I bet if Wal-Mart supports with large amounts of money, the correct local groups such as the SPLC, they will not be associated with racists or haters. No money, no peace.

      1. Suki   13 years ago

        They already support "green" projects all over the place and you see where that is getting them. Just a waste of money and messing up the bottom line.

    7. SIV   13 years ago

      I can see it sparking "xenophobia".

      WalMart on a weekend will give you a good idea of how many Mexicans live in your community. Go to the super mercado, flea market or taqueria and you'll think they've taken over.

      1. T   13 years ago

        Me and the wife used to refer to one of the local WalMarts as WallyMundo, because if we went in there on a Saturday, we were the only anglos in the joint.

        1. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

          At least you didn't have to drive your family cross country in a beat-up station wagon just to have it be closed when you got there.

    8. Brian D   13 years ago

      According to the study by professors at Penn State University, New Mexico State University and Michigan State University, the number of Wal-Mart stores in a county correlates significantly with the number of hate groups in the area.

      ...

      While the study only specifically examined the correlation between hate groups and Wal-Mart stores, the researchers feel the presence of Wal-Mart in an area generally indicates the establishment of other types of big-box retailers, such as Home Depot and Target.

      "We're not trying to pick on Wal-Mart," Goetz said. "In this study, Wal-Mart is really serving as a proxy for any type of large retailer."

      We're not trying to pick on Wal-Mart, but by using only them as a proxy for all large retailers (as opposed to actually using all retailers) the conclusion we want people to come to is more plausible.

      1. Suki   13 years ago

        Maybe they missed a few "hate groups" in their research? Places that work their asses off to keep Walmart out are full of the most hateful people around. See Penn & Teller's "Bullshit!" episode about Walmart.

    9. Brett L   13 years ago

      Of course they do. Look at the raving loonies who turn up whenever they try to build a Walmart in NYC or Chicago.

      1. wareagle   13 years ago

        on occasion, the loonies are outnumbered by the number who want to apply for work at Wal-Mart. Probably hoping to start local chapters of various hate groups.

    10. fried wylie   13 years ago

      this just reaffirms my belief that the entire field of statistics is bullshit.

    11. Pip   13 years ago

      Whatever conclusion Stephan wants, Stephan Goetz.

    12. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

      "We're not trying to pick on Wal-Mart," Goetz said. "In this study, Wal-Mart is really serving as a proxy for any type of large retailer."

      The researchers suggest Wal-Mart use the study's data to determine strategies for supporting local groups that can foster stronger social and economic community ties.

      Buy our dataset! Do it! Do it now!

    13. Emmerson Biggins   13 years ago

      And this was not written by the SPLC? I'm a little surprised.

      1. PapayaSF   13 years ago

        They used the SPLC for the list of hate groups. Did you know Chick Publications is a hate group? And that every local chapter of Nation of Islam (and many other national groups) counts as a separate group?

  20. nicole   13 years ago

    It's not about volunteerism.

    Thanks for the reminder, Axelrod. Puke.

  21. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Facebook, Apple threat to online freedom: Google's Sergey Brin

    For tonight's performance, the part of Online Freedom will be played by Google's market share.

    1. Kwanzaa Cake   13 years ago

      So says the guy who is about the dilute the shit out of his shareholders to tighten his grip on what is supposed to be a public company.

      1. Randian   13 years ago

        Are they? I hadn't heard about a stock dilution. Are they going to issue a ton of new shares? Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

    2. rac3rx   13 years ago

      Yeah I thought this was rich coming from the company that self-censors to stay in China.

  22. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    20 US agents could be involved in Colombian hooker woe
    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/n.....KVhkhNDObJ

    The Secret Service's seamy hooker scandal may have involved as many as 20 elite US agents ? who are specifically trained to avoid such security-breach pitfalls, officials and sources said yesterday.

    1. Abdul   13 years ago

      20 US agents could be involved in Colombian hooker woe

      That's one hard working girl.

      1. Suki   13 years ago

        Not to mention the donkey.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

      I envision Clint Eastwood's next film ...

    3. SugarFree   13 years ago

      My favorite part of the story is that they were only caught because one of them refused to pay his sex worker. How much could a Columbian hooker have cost in the first place?

      1. Citizen Nothing   13 years ago

        But's he's trying to survive on a public servant's salary.

      2. Abdul   13 years ago

        It costs more when you have to screw away the memories of seeing Michelle Obama skinny-dipping in the White House pool.

        1. fried wylie   13 years ago

          ah, "The Eraser" package.

        2. Pip   13 years ago

          *barf*

          1. KMA Too   13 years ago

            Isn't that Barfman's thing?

            Where the hell is he???

            1. SugarFree   13 years ago

              In the future, everyone with be barfman for 15 minutes.

      3. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

        $47 apparently. I'm not au fait with Colombian (or other) sex tariffs but this does not seem worth arguing over. But I am not a low-paid worker who nobly sacrificed a hooker 'n' blow salary for the unspeakable nobility of public service. Raise their pay now! Not only is it fair, it's a stimulus measure

        1. Elspeth Flashman   13 years ago

          stimulus measure - tee hee.

      4. kinnath   13 years ago

        47 dollars

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

          I want my 47 dollars!

          http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uOsr.....llars.jpeg

        2. AuH2O   13 years ago

          Don't give no damn Colombian Hooker tree fifty!

      5. plu1959   13 years ago

        How much could a Columbian hooker have cost in the first place?

        Have you any idea what tuition is these days? That kind scratch doesn't grow on trees, y'know.

        1. SugarFree   13 years ago

          Should have called up an NYU girl, they just give it away.

          1. plu1959   13 years ago

            They take pity on a poor feller.

    4. Rich   13 years ago

      Secret Service regulations do not bar its agents and uniformed officers from drinking or patronizing prostitutes ? because the agency assumed it wouldn't need to spell out such a rule, one source said.

      What's magic about the Secret Service in making such assumptions? I dare say regs for all government agencies specify sanctions for, say, sleeping on the job.

      "Common sense of what a Secret Service agent does dictates you be in complete appropriate physical condition."

      Alrighty, then!

      1. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

        They're just trying to protect the agents' essence. These women are, apparently, always trying to steal it.

  23. AuH2O   13 years ago

    George Washington: Britain's greatest foe

    HE'S COMING!

    1. AuH2O   13 years ago

      Also: Eat it, Gandhi!

    2. Brett L   13 years ago

      Interesting. I guess the generational hatred of Bonaparte has died down since the world wars. In 1912, Bonaparte would've won hands down. Also, Washington won in the end, so that probably gave him the edge. (And the fact that he was Brit trained.)

      1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        And in the meantime, the US came to dominate the world and overshadow GB, and France.... became France.

        1. Brett L   13 years ago

          Good point.

    3. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

      Washington, Washington.
      12 stories tall, made of radiation.

      1. Randian   13 years ago

        He once held an opponent's wife's hand...in a jar of acid...at a party.

        1. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

          He saves the children, but not the British children!

  24. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    By Arctic standards, the region is already buzzing with military activity, and experts believe that will increase significantly in the years ahead.

    I thought things would have quieted down after Penny found Desmond.

    1. Citizen Nothing   13 years ago

      Not Penny's boats

  25. Joe M   13 years ago

    Just to highlight the pure disingenuous bullshit spewing from Axelrod's mouth:

    Axelrod rejected the idea that Obama could just donate some of his extra income to the Treasury absent such a rule.

    "That's not the way we operate our tax system, okay?" he said on "Fox News Sunday." "We don't run bake sales. It's not about volunteerism. We all kick in according to the system."[...]

    Axelrod explained that the reason the president's tax rate was so low was because he donated 22 percent of his income to charity.

    Sickening.

    1. Joe M   13 years ago

      And of course, the secondary thread here is that we would be better off if the government got more money, and charities less.

    2. Night Elf Mohawk   13 years ago

      It's not about volunteerism? Harry Reid is going terribly surprised.

      1. Randian   13 years ago

        Beat me to it!

    3. Bardas Phocas   13 years ago

      ...because he felt he was a better judge of where his money should go rather than the corrupt and venal politicians.

      What a racist tea bagger.

    4. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

      I'm betting that if he had to pay for the many, many lavish vacations that his wife and children take with his own money, you know, like everyone else in America, that "donation" figure would drop quite a bit.

      1. wareagle   13 years ago

        so it's guilt money? The whole story is just too damn funny - don't watch what I do, voters, listen instead to my words of how the rich do not pay a thing. Out of curiosity, I wonder what charities would lose if tax rates were raised on their primary benefactors.

        1. Elspeth Flashman   13 years ago

          trust me, charities are worried about that very thing. I worked for a church for nearly 3 years. Back in 2008, a big drop in donations when the "cap" on charitable donations was being discussed. Certain big year end donors were slow, late, or non-existent.

  26. SugarFree   13 years ago

    The scourge of cheap natural gas!

    Also, read a few of the comments by George Tazberik. Has an old "friend" of ours moved on to greener pastures, or do they just all read off the same script?

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

      Ugh. What a shithead.

      "You're just not being serious! Therefore what you have to say is not important."

    2. shrike   13 years ago

      Wow, that crazy hyperinflation the wingnuttery keeps talking about has NatGas at $2 -- less than 15% of 2005 highs.

      Coal is falling too.

      DAMNED HYPERIFLASHUNS!

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

        I don't recall anyone ever saying the the rules of supply and demand were being suspended.

        1. shrike   13 years ago

          That is my line.

          The wingnutterry says that QE is causing hyperinflation. Except prices keep falling for nearly everything. Even US Treasury yields.

          Of course gold is in a fear-based bubble - for now.

          1. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

            Not for my fucking bread, milk and eggs. I can't eat gas asshole.

            1. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

              In Ronald Bailey's future you will be able to.

              1. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

                "I am become death, consumer of worlds."

          2. Randian   13 years ago

            Inflation or Japanese-style miasma of lost decades.

            You decide - it's one or the other. Would you like to make a bet on it?

            Of course, no one said anything about "hyperinflation", did they?

          3. Spoonman.   13 years ago

            Dude, two years ago a loaf of bread was 78 cents. Now it's $1.67.

            Anecdotal, sure, but WTF?

            1. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

              Apparently Shrike shops in the only grocery store in the US where the prices have remained stable. I wish I knew where that was; mine have gone up between 30-50%.

              1. shrike   13 years ago

                Yeah, every single item I buy has fallen since 2008 when "QE" began.

                There is no relationship with prices and bond buying (QE). This is not M2 we are talking about (although that is up too).

                1. Randian   13 years ago

                  Yeah, every single item I buy has fallen since 2008 when "QE" began.

                  This isn't even possible.

                2. Spoonman.   13 years ago

                  Yeah, every single item I buy has fallen since 2008 when "QE" began.

                  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          4. Kwanzaa Cake   13 years ago

            No one has said IS causing, and hyperinflationis also hyperbole. The argument is that QE will cause inflation down the line. You could try being at least minimally honest here, Shrike. Not to mention that one commodity is down to a shift inthe supply curve (nat gas) while others are quite expensive. Or perhaps you have no need to fill your gas tank and therefore haven't noticed the price of oil.

            1. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

              You could try being at least minimally honest here, Shrike.

              HAHAHAHA, good one.

      2. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

        shrike should spend more time servicing Soros' cock than typing his inane bullshit on here.

        Amazing how he finds time to do both.

        1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

          you don't need your mouth to type

          1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

            It's the multitasking that amazes me. Tony and shrike getting DP'ed and taking a choad to the tonsils, AND all while typing their pro-statist/pro-socialist bullshit? Fuckin' amazing.

            Hell, I can't walk and think about chewing gun at the same time.

    3. Warty   13 years ago

      roger
      A Manhattan project for energy should include banning coal, likewise oil... with that being gone, we could get something done- project wise...
      12 Hours Ago from slate.com

      George Tazberik
      Well roger, unfortunately, due to those who came before, we can't just ban it overnight.
      10 Hours Ago from slate.com

      BIG. THINKS.

      1. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

        I wonder how they'd power their little project.

        1. Brett L   13 years ago

          Hope and burning denialists.

          1. Warty   13 years ago

            burning denialists

            For the future is dark and full of terrors.

          2. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

            Burning denialists? So they'll be working in Germany? I hear there are a few good spots that just need a little renovation.

  27. AuH2O   13 years ago

    So, how long till a porno with some play on Secret Service, such as sexual service, comes out?

    1. Ken Shultz   13 years ago

      I'm sure they're shooting right now.

      No pun intended.

      1. Ken Shultz   13 years ago

        On the other hand, a Barack Obama look-alike might be hard to find.

        1. SugarFree   13 years ago

          Barack Obama look-alike might be hard to find

          Trayvon Martin is dead, after all.

          1. AuH2O   13 years ago

            That's the true tragedy of this story: One of our nation's greatest potential pornography actors lies dead.

    2. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

      That would be pretty funny. A Secret Service agent (and he MUST be dressed as a spook, complete with polarized sunglasses) shows up unexpectedly at some woman's home, cash in hand. She answers the door in the nude. Hijinks ensue.

    3. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

      What about the other way around? She has come to interrogate him, and she has ways of making him talk

      1. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

        Relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1sf2CzEq0w

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

          My favorite Golden Earring track.

          1. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

            It has a little something for everyone. 😉

            (One of my faves also.)

      2. BakedPenguin   13 years ago

        "Secretly Serviced" - one Columbian girl takes on 20 SS agents. She thinks she's done, but little does she know the President is coming for some service of his own.

        1. AuH2O   13 years ago

          "Secretly Serviced" - one Columbian girl takes on 20 SS agents. She thinks she's done, but little does she know the President is coming for some service of his own.

          FIFY

          1. AuH2O   13 years ago

            GODDAMNIT! I meant to write in cumming

            /Goldwater FAIL

            1. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

              I thought you were going for a gay porn thing, like then the President comes ahem and takes on 20 SS agents. That would be pretty funny too.

        2. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

          +100 internetz

    4. Abdul   13 years ago

      In my screenplay, it's just like a regular old porno, but a guy in a black suit with an earpiece jumps in and takes the moneyshot for the president.

      1. AuH2O   13 years ago

        So, gay porn?

  28. AuH2O   13 years ago

    Should Iowa child support recipients prove they don't do drugs?

    As tempting as it is to say yes, I am getting awfully tired of our culture of drug testing, especially when it never applies to Congress or the President, and ends up being more of a test for pot than for cocaine.

    1. Ken Shultz   13 years ago

      If drug tests become mandatory for receiving welfare from the government, it might make sense to do the same thing...

      You should still have to pay child support into some kind of escrow, and when the test comes back negative,...

      I don't see why demanding a drug test with good cause would be so wrong. The state making a man pay for his baby mama's meth habit, especially if she's neglecting his kids, amounts to cruel and unusual punishment if you ask me.

      1. AuH2O   13 years ago

        I understand that, but we always talk about welfare recipients, when I feel the first people that should be tested are lawmakers and executives. And, funny story: A lot of staffers, at least, would probably fail if they are truly random because hoo boy do a lot do coke.

        The other reason I like that is because it forces legislators to live with the consequences of the drug war they impose.

        1. Ken Shultz   13 years ago

          I like it!

          I want breathalyzers in all their cars, too.

          Hey, if they don't have anything to hide, then they don't have anything to worry about!

          1. AuH2O   13 years ago

            Y'know, I tried to make that argument once, and some person bitched me out because, "Civil service people are working for a living, welfare recipients are just sponging off the system" sort of shit.

            Clearly, they were a civil servant, and clearly, they were deaf, dumb, and blind.

        2. Rich   13 years ago

          This.

          Further, all congresscreatures and administration weenies should have to state for public record under oath every mind-altering substance they have ever ingested or witnessed being ingested.

        3. Brett L   13 years ago

          Unfortunately, the elected officials have a Constitutional argument. Using or not using drugs isn't a Constitutional test for office disqualification. (I'm thinking of proposing an amendment to the FL constitution that says that if the State requires any of its employees to pass drug tests, all elected officials must also.)

          1. AuH2O   13 years ago

            Well, we wouldn't fire them for it then. We would just know how big of shitbag hypocrites they were.

            1. Brett L   13 years ago

              Oh, that's a good point. No consequences except publicity.

              1. AuH2O   13 years ago

                Also, and I understand that politicians as a general rule lack the capacity to feel this emotion, but it might shame some of them out of office or at least into a token stint in rehab.

                1. Soc Indv Sparky   13 years ago

                  Come on, if they had a sense of shame they wouldn't have made it into office. Such an emotion can only have a negative impact on a political career.

          2. Night Elf Mohawk   13 years ago

            Fine, just don't pay them. If highway dollars can be used like a club, so can their salaries.

            1. T   13 years ago

              We have to give them something, as ascertained by law. We have to compensate them for their services, so I guess a slap in the head with a brick and a lovely parting gift qualifies. No mention is made of filthy money.

              1. Night Elf Mohawk   13 years ago

                $0.01 per term.

        4. wareagle   13 years ago

          then test anyone getting money from the govt. It is accepted that govt money comes with strings; why are salaries or welfare checks exempt from that? Anyone unhappy with the rule is free to pursue a life that does not involve the acceptance of govt paychecks or welfare checks.

          1. T   13 years ago

            They drug test buck privates who have no responsibility at all. But the guy with his finger on the button and the command codes get a pass, as do the collection of morons that can actually declare war.

            1. Dunphy (the real one)   13 years ago

              and they can't drug test in our dept. without sufficient cause.

              it's the law!!! (THE LAW(tm))

  29. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    "That's not the way we operate our tax system, okay?" he said on "Fox News Sunday." "We don't run bake sales. It's not about volunteerism. We all kick in according to the system."

    It's a fascinating mindset. So concerned are they with what others do, it doesn't even cross their minds that they could take it upon themselves to act on their supposed beliefs regardless of everyone else. "If no one else is paying the rate I think they and I should pay, I'm not either."

    1. Rich   13 years ago

      In the immoral words of Joe Biden: "It's time to be patriotic ... time to jump in, time to be part of the deal, time to help get America out of the rut."

      1. Dunphy (the real one)   13 years ago

        immoral... lol

    2. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

      I'd like to do my part to give back.

      ...Then go ahead and give it.

      1. Brett L   13 years ago

        They always pull this shit. The address for Gifts to the Treasury is in Google. Right next to directions to the Cape. Have one of your assistants look it up.

  30. darius404   13 years ago

    U.S. judge finds for MegaUpload, orders DOJ to cooperate on user files

    1. Hell's Librarian   13 years ago

      I LOL'd: Security footage of that raid has since mysteriously disappeared while in police custody.

      But it is good to know that this particular case is unfolding in a manner perhaps unanticipated by the DOJ. They could use a good kick or three in the crotch.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

        The circle jerk didn't look as good on video as they anticipated.

    2. mr simple   13 years ago

      At least six movie studios have argued that MegaUpload was growing an illegal operation that, at its core, was just designed to facilitate piracy.

      A movie studio said it? Then it must be true! This is the primary function of a movie studio, right?

  31. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

    Who the heck is this Ed kid and what did he do with Riggsy?!

    In other news: anyone else see Cabin in the Woods?

    1. AuH2O   13 years ago

      Riggs got too old for this shit.

      1. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

        Maybe he finally donated that kidney and is in recovery.

    2. Trespassers W   13 years ago

      anyone else see Cabin in the Woods?

      Yes. But not me.

  32. Pip   13 years ago

    Dead rappers never die:

    http://www.wtop.com/?nid=551&sid=2828862

    1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

      hope it ended appropriately with a drive-by shooting out the screen

      1. AuH2O   13 years ago

        Is there Australian based rap? And if so, which historically disenfranchised group dominates it- aboriginals?

        And yes, I realize on my Australia questions I sound super ignorant. But you toilets flush in a different direction, so who knows what goes on down under!

        1. Quetzalcoatl   13 years ago

          Ooooo... I would love to hear rap with an Australian accent!
          Spittin' verses about drop-bears and the appropriate size for knives, etc.

        2. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

          don't apologise, many Australians are super ignorant about ... well, everything, actually

          Re rap, there is Australian rap but it's not very popular, and Aborigines do not dominate it. Seems to be a bit more of a suburban wog and white kid thing. But on this I am no expert - my favourite Australian group is The Necks, now that TISM have split - and I am a bit detached from teh kidz and their concerns

          1. db   13 years ago

            One of the greatest albums ever recorded was made in Australia.

            1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

              nice call!

        3. Ed   13 years ago

          I'm a fan of this guy I heard on Aussie radio: http://vimeo.com/29304503

  33. DengFing   13 years ago

    Sounds to me like they might jsut be onto something dude.

    http://www.Gettin-Anon.tk

  34. Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow   13 years ago

    Roger Gary 2012

    http://rvgary2012.com/

  35. robc   13 years ago

    Lessons apparently not learned from the Soviets or Steve McNair:

    Dont stick it in crazy

  36. Warty   13 years ago

    Virgil against Empire

    1. Brett L   13 years ago

      The Aeneid was derivative and far less exciting to me than the original.

  37. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    The Truth About Benny Hill
    http://www.sabotagetimes.com/f.....enny-hill/

    1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

      his penchant for prostitutes, addiction to amphetamines and reluctance to spend a penny of his ?7.5million fortune.

      He'd fit right in around here

      1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

        we are all Benny Hill

        1. Pip   13 years ago

          I AM BENNY HILL.

      2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

        I don't know why, but I'm picturing him as his character in Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.

    2. Joe M   13 years ago

      Yeah, remember all those scenes that looked like they were on fast forward? That was just the meth.

    3. PapayaSF   13 years ago

      Interesting article. I love it that the BBC had (has?) a Head of Light Entertainment.

      My favorite Benny Hill story is that he went to visit Charlie Chaplin's home in Switzerland, and saw that Chaplin had a collection of Benny Hill videotapes. What a thrill that must have been.

    4. R C Dean   13 years ago

      How can you have a meth addiction and be that fat?

      1. Joe M   13 years ago

        It's kinda like the stimulus. Things would've been even worse with it!

  38. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

    Watch out Samantha Brick, you have a rival

    'I can concentrate on being the person I want to be': Former millionaire businessman sets aside ?120,000 to become a woman

  39. Brett L   13 years ago

    Don't worry, Timmy, this is how New Yorkers show their love.

    "NEW YORK (AP) ? Tim Tebow has work to do if he's going to win over New York sports fans.

    The new backup quarterback for the Jets was booed at Yankee Stadium on Sunday night when he was shown on the giant video board ? even though he was wearing a Yankees cap."

    1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

      I heard they were actually booing Dwayne Wade, who was sitting next to him.

      1. SugarFree   13 years ago

        I was saying "Boo-urns."

      2. Brett L   13 years ago

        I like my version better.

        1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          I understand. I had to give a presentation to try to transfer departments in January, and I had to lead it off with "I'll do my best, but my voice is a little lost from going to the game on Saturday." I was yelling Teeee-bow for about 2 hours.

          1. Brett L   13 years ago

            You're a sick, sick man.

            1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

              What is sick about taunting Tebow for having fewer completions than his opponent has TD's?

              1. Brett L   13 years ago

                As long as you were taunting him. Although rooting for Brady... I couldn't do that, either.

                1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

                  There were about 70000 people chanting his name the entire second half. I'm pretty sure it wasn't praise for his 3 first half completions.

  40. Pope Jimbo   13 years ago

    Dangerous dogs are a quandary for police

    Chasing a fugitive sex offender out of a north Minneapolis house on a March evening, police found two threatening pit bulls coming at them. A Minneapolis officer opened fire, and a bullet hit another officer in the leg by mistake.

    The wounded officer was not seriously injured. Yet the shooting became the latest example of what can go wrong when officers shoot at dogs. The tactic has led to lawsuits, a melee and unintended injuries in recent years.

    Minneapolis police shot and killed 12 dogs last year, and park police shot and killed one, Sgt. William Palmer said. Minneapolis police say it's an appropriate response to an unpredictable threat.

    I'm worried that our cops have only managed to cap 12 dogs. Don't they have enough firepower? How will Minneapolis ever be taken seriously as a metropolitan area if we are only offing one dog a month?

    1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

      imagine what will happen when the dogs start buying guns on the black market and shooting cops, rather than relying on the cops to do it themselves

  41. db   13 years ago

    A fair weather friend of Mali hightails it out when the going gets tough. I can't decide whether her naivete or her, to be blunt, cowardice is worse. There are so many things wrong witg what she thought she was doing in Mali but alas, that's the trouble with the white man's burden. I can understand leaving to protect her child, but her decision process in going there and what she thought she could accomplish is questionable.

    1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

      I think our ardent desire to believe in the symbol of Malian democracy kept us from dealing with deeper issues.

      Sound familiar?

  42. Joe M   13 years ago

    Ron Paul supporters are Nazis.

    There were going to be 3 candidates allowed to speak. I was told a couple of days before [...] that I would be allowed an unlimited amount of time to speak. The first candidate allowed to speak, Chris Fields, a Libertarian, was allowed an unlimited amount of time. [...] I had prepared a 30 minute speech. I told Chris the length of time I expected my speech to take. They knew that I was going to criticize the Libertarian platform, and expose that Chris Fields is actually a Libertarian, and expose his positions, etc. [...] Juliette Jordahl, a Libertarian, then quickly brought a motion to limit my speech to 10 minutes. It passed. I am currently reading a book, Dietrich Bonhoeffer. One of the first things the Nazis did was to outlaw speech criticizing the Nazis.

    So there you have it. Those nasty Libertarians using established rules and procedures to act like Nazis. Never mind that Nazis suppressed speech violently.

    1. Brett L   13 years ago

      Holy Jesus. A 30 minute speech? For Congressperson? Uh, also, "Wikipedia states" is only acceptable proof for bar bets. Also, conveniently, no mention of how long her opponents spoke. Just. Wow. I can't imagine how this wonderful lady wouldn't have won the nomination at any other GOP gathering.

      1. Joe M   13 years ago

        Yes, the whole letter is a gem, and music to my ears. Her tears are delicious.

    2. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

      I am currently reading a book, Dietrich Bonhoeffer. One of the first things the Nazis did was to outlaw speech criticizing the Nazis.

      But did Dietrich get the girl in the end? And is it being made into a movie?

      1. Warty   13 years ago

        Hitler was the sexiest teen vampire, dude. Sorry to spoil it for you.

    3. Brandon   13 years ago

      "They began the Convention. There was no opening prayer. Not even a mention of it.

      There was also no Pledge of Allegiance to the US flag."

      The Horror!

    4. Brandon   13 years ago

      " I mentioned that President and General George Washington did not advocate pot smoking and that if he did, we probably would not have won the American Revolutionary War."

      What is...I don't even...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Autumn Billings | 6.2.2025 5:30 PM

Harvard International Student With a Private Instagram? You Might Not Get a Visa.

Emma Camp | 6.2.2025 4:57 PM

J.D. Vance Wants a Free Market for Crypto. What About Everything Else?

Eric Boehm | 6.2.2025 4:40 PM

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!