Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

Reason Writers on the Tube: Katherine Mangu-Ward Talks Housing and the Fed at Freedom Watch

Reason Staff | 7.9.2011 1:39 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Reason Senior Editor Katherine Mangu-Ward appeared on Freedom Watch to discuss how the Federal Reserve gave billions of dollars to Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, and others. Airdate: July 7, 2011.

About 8 minutes.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Set Tivos to Stun! C-SPAN's Brian Lamb Interviews Nick Gillespie on Sunday, July 10!

Reason Staff
CultureTelevision
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (52)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. spencer   14 years ago

    Is it morally bankrupt to suggest a "women of reason" calendar?

    1. Comment Tater   14 years ago

      No, but it would end at March.

      1. PersonalJustice   14 years ago

        You just need to broaden the scope. Imagine: "The Women of the Kochtopus" (with a few strategically placed tentacles).

        1. Mr Whipple   14 years ago

          I think you would have to fit Blythe Masters in there somewhere, no?

          1. rather   14 years ago

            I hope these serious journalist get so fed up with your sexism that they publish your faces and asses to be rated by the women of Feministing
            ....and skip the blah blah blah it's a compliment

            1. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

              You seem upset. Is it that time of the month:) jj

              1. rather   14 years ago

                Did I threaten to rip out your scrotum?

                1. Comment Tater   14 years ago

                  See, this is why you can't be Miss April.

                  1. rather   14 years ago

                    epi would be Miss April sunshine

                2. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

                  I usually have to pay extra for that kind of abuse:)

                  1. rather   14 years ago

                    lol. What you do with your mother, sister, hooker or priest is none of my business

                    1. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

                      What do you mean "or". They're all one person:)

                    2. rather   14 years ago

                      Hmm, I didn't know libertarians have their own church?

                    3. Comment Tater   14 years ago

                      It's not a church per se. More of a fraternity. The Brotherhood of the Perpetual Jacket.

                    4. rather   14 years ago

                      I'm sure the initiations are sweet

                    5. Comment Tater   14 years ago

                      Instead of wooden paddles, they use sarcasm.

                    6. rather   14 years ago

                      I hear their maxim is
                      Up crack with a paddle 😉

    2. Almanian   14 years ago

      What Comment said, and "lol"

  2. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

    Feds: Pot has no medical purpose
    Marijuana will remain in the same class of drugs as heroin

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43.....alth_care/

    1. Mr Whipple   14 years ago

      So, how is oxycodone not in the same class as heroin?

      1. Almanian   14 years ago

        Please. Don't. Give. Them. Ideas.

        *retires to living room to indulge in leftover oxvcodone from last broken bone*

      2. Otto   14 years ago

        Duh. Doctors use oxy. They don't use heroin.

        Well, they do in the UK, but not here, because heroin has no medical value in the US like it does in Britain.

        1. Mr Whipple   14 years ago

          I had a feeling that was going to be a Lou Reed link.

          1. Charlie Parker   14 years ago

            Spare change?

          2. Otto   14 years ago

            Just listened to the song prior to coming here.

            The whole "medical use" BS might ultimately be the undoing of the drug law nightmare we have in this country.

            As someone mentions downthread, it's BS to begin with, considering the choice aspect. However, even on its own terms, it's bullshit. Marijuana has obvious, well documented medical benefits. The two most prominent are lessening intra-ocular pressure in glaucoma patients and reducing or eliminating nausea in cancer & AIDS patients receiving chemo or anti-viral meds.

            In a way, the Feds' total and complete dishonesty may well be their ultimate undoing - that they cannot be honest about the most benign substance currently on the illegal drug list should show Americans with integrity that they are not to be trusted to determine what people should and should not be allowed to take. The only question is how long it will take for that penny to drop.

    2. Amakudari   14 years ago

      DHHS concluded that marijuana has a high potential for abuse, has no accepted medical use in the United States, and lacks an acceptable level of safety for use even under medical supervision.

      At the end of the day, the War on Drugs kills people and ruins countless lives. Americans who support it are responsible, and its executors even more so. How could any doctor -- or semi-literate adult, for that matter -- come to the reasoned conclusion that marijuana is extraordinarily addictive, impossible to use safely (just try to kill yourself by smoking too much pot at once), and has no effect on pain, appetite, glaucoma, etc.? What scumbags.

      1. squarooticus   14 years ago

        Even more fundamentally, why do most Americans think it is any of their business what other people ingest?

        My body, my choice.

        1. rather   14 years ago

          Even more fundamentally, why do most Americans think it is any of their business what other people abort?

          My body, my choice.

          1. squarooticus   14 years ago

            You're the kind of dork who explains punchlines at parties, right?

            1. rather   14 years ago

              Hmm, never been called a dork. How quaint

          2. Mr. FIFY   14 years ago

            Smoking tobacco, wearing seat belts, consumption of trans-fats... we can play this game all day, rather.

          3. spencer   14 years ago

            What if you abort it and he eats it? That's everyone's choice right? We're all happy then, yes? I'll film it and put it on the webs.

            1. rather   14 years ago

              Already been done

              http://rctlfy.wordpress.com/20.....ck-holmes/

      2. dunphy   14 years ago

        actually, to be precise they do not say ADDICTIVE (in the medical sense, which is what that word implies when you refer to doctors especially) they say "prone to abuse"

        a not unsubtle difference, and all that is required under schedule I

        not defending, just clarifying.

  3. christian louboutin shoes   14 years ago

    yeah!Maybe it would ended at April.louboutin 2010

  4. christian louboutin shoes   14 years ago

    woo!I like it ,Maybe it would ended at April.

  5. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

    "creating a .secure domain where Fourth Amendment rights to privacy are voluntarily foregone"

    Voluntary for how long?

    http://www.foxnews.com/scitech.....r-threats/

    1. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

      Maybe they can create separate airline terminals where people can choose to not go through a security checkpoint.

      1. Mr. FIFY   14 years ago

        Don't they have those for politicians and other Chosen People?

        1. Otto   14 years ago

          I've heard if you fly on privately chartered planes (or your own plane), you can avoid the lines.

          1. Gray Ghost   14 years ago

            Exactly. The ability to dodge the TSA lines/baggage headaches, added to the original purpose of being able to go to smaller, out of the way airports, is IMO the main reason for going private in the first place.

            I haven't looked at the economics of charter jet general aviation, but I'd be surprised if every new TSA crackdown didn't result in large increases in GA demand. Even at the $5000 a flight and up that a jet card typically costs.

            Unless I have to fly for work, any future trips I make are going to be done by car. I doubt I'm alone in that.

    2. Amakudari   14 years ago

      The idea goes something like this: China and other regimes around the world inherently have an upper hand...

      Please go play in traffic, Mr. Hayden.

      But I'm sure with the CIA in control .secure would be totally secure.

  6. Otto   14 years ago

    Just so there can be one on-topic post on the subject (I feel bad about participating in the threadjacks), Katherine's point about there being winners and losers in the housing crash is important.

    Were I of a more conspiratorial mindset, I'd suspect those calling the policy of the MSM of dictating that this be overlooked, b/c they've already bought their houses.

    1. rather   14 years ago

      I feel bad about participating in the threadjacks
      Ya, sure

    2. Furthermore   14 years ago

      "Otto" is toot" spelled inside out.
      Both are palindromes.
      The end.

    3. dunphy   14 years ago

      i was a winner. i made a LOT of money on the house i sold and didn't have to buy a house until 3 yrs later when houses were way fucking cheeeper

      housing market bubble/collapse was a DEFINITE win for me!

  7. russell_barnes   14 years ago

    Try betasell.com

  8. russell_barnes   14 years ago

    You should try @ betasell.com

  9. rosetta stone   14 years ago

    The book was fun. I liked the reprinting of his sexual fantasy letters to Penthouse.
    His fiction was outstanding, even then

  10. rosetta stone   14 years ago

    The book was fun. I liked the reprinting of his sexual fantasy letters to Penthouse.
    His fiction was outstanding, even then

  11. granite countertop   14 years ago

    Every day we face with countertop,you can have a high quality of life with granite countertop of yalitongstone,but we will also very pleased if you can see Huaxingstone's granite countertop.

  12. Air Jordan Ol School   14 years ago

    That's cool!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

ICE on Ice

Eric Boehm | 6.16.2025 9:30 AM

Parades Are Great, but We Shouldn't Venerate the Military

J.D. Tuccille | 6.16.2025 7:00 AM

Trump's Immigrant Removals Aren't Technically Deportations. So What Are They?

C.J. Ciaramella | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: That's Not Funny

Charles Oliver | 6.16.2025 4:00 AM

How Freedom Lovers Can Reckon with Addicts and Addiction

Daniel Akst | 6.15.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!