Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Nanny State

River-Swimming Without Life Vest Now Illegal Near Seattle

Matt Welch | 6.22.2011 9:42 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The latest sign that my entire childhood could be retroactively criminalized:

People who hope to beat the summer heat by swimming, floating or boating on rivers in King County must wear a life vest or face an $86 fine.

A divided County Council on Monday passed a personal flotation device ordinance by a five to four vote. Opponents said it was an intrusive move by "big government."

"This Council sometimes thinks it's everybody's mom," said Councilwoman Kathy Lambert, who voted "no." […]

Councilwoman Julia Patterson, a "yes" vote, said the same arguements […] made agains the life vest ordinance were also made against laws requiring child safety seats in automobiles and banning smoking in public places.

"We are improving the health for everyone because of these laws that we pass," she said.

Link via the Twitter feed of Mary Katharine Ham.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: C-SPAN After Dark: Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.), Accused of Sexual Harassment, Talks Perversion Up the Ying-Yang

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Nanny State
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (104)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Lord Humungus   14 years ago

    "We are improving the health for everyone because of these laws that we pass," she said.

    Are bans against dancing and rock n' roll far behind (ala the movie Footloose)?

    1. Irresponsible Hater   14 years ago

      "far behind"? No.

      Already here, yes.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related

  2. Almanian   14 years ago

    How can Natural FUCKING Selection work if stupid City/County Councils keep passing regulations like this?

    Then more people live and have to be covered under Obamacare, thus driving up the cost of healthcare.

    WAY TO GO, KING COUNTY!

    1. Dinosaurs   14 years ago

      If only we had worn lifejackets and helmets.

      1. gators,turtles, lizards, birds   14 years ago

        we dinosaurs did !

    2. Brett L   14 years ago

      They don't believe in natural selection, just evolution.

      1. Tonio   14 years ago

        Which is a brilliant and sad-but-true summation of liberalism.

      2. MaestroBud   14 years ago

        If this series of events reflected natural selection, the one's who voted in favor of this measure would have never made it to serve in the first place... Moreover, if safety/security serves as the rationale, then the one's who voted "yes" arguably deserve neither security nor liberty.

  3. Cyto   14 years ago

    same arguements [...] were also made against laws requiring child safety seats in automobiles and banning smoking in public places.

    And more people die in their own bathrooms every month than recreational river swimming yearly - maybe ever. So let's get hopping on that "ban bathtubs that hold over 2 inches of water" ordinance, and "ban hard tile in bathrooms" ordinance and "ban slippery surfaces" ordinance. Come on King County! People are dieing out there!

    1. Name Withheld   14 years ago

      I feel your pain, but shouldn't there be a Godwin for bathtub dangers?

      1. Almanian   14 years ago

        May you be struck by lightning

    2. RealJim   14 years ago

      The message in that quote is "adults=children", and the government is the only true adult.

  4. sarcasmic   14 years ago

    When the government outlaws swimming without a vest, only outlaws will swim without a vest.

  5. WTF   14 years ago

    Holy shit, what a bunch of pussies.

    1. Almanian   14 years ago

      if I rearrange the letters of your handle, we get "FTW" - bravo!

  6. Aelhues   14 years ago

    "We are improving the health for everyone because of these laws that we pass," she said.

    That is exactly the problem with things like seatbelt, helmet, and other such personal safety laws. The bastards don't know when to quit.

    Allowing that maybe government should be in the business of protecting us from ourselves, one should still consider whether it is possible for a reasonable person to do something, like swimming in a river, safely, without government protection. If so, they should be allowed to do so. If government can't make reasonable distinctions in gray areas, they should not have the power to do so at all.

    1. OO   14 years ago

      i tie-back my lawnmower safety grip. the horrors...

    2. MaestroBud   14 years ago

      Those who elected these paternalists have only themselves to blame (or credit).

    3. Nanny S Tate   14 years ago

      one should still consider whether it is possible for a reasonable person to do something, like swimming in a river, safely, without government protection. If so, they should be allowed to do so.

      No, no, NO!! One should consider whether it is possible for an unreasonable person to do something, like swimming in a river, unsafely, without government protection. If so, people in general should not be allowed to do so.

    4. JD   14 years ago

      "We are improving the health for everyone because of these laws that we pass," she said.

      Because we all know that when we don't wear a lifevest we are putting everyone around us in danger of sceond-hand drowning.

  7. sarcasmic   14 years ago

    BTW Reason, you're late. Drudge was linked to this story two days ago.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    ...must wear a life vest or face an $86 fine.

    King County needs money.

    1. Neu Mejican   14 years ago

      True dat. Really.

  9. Neu Mejican   14 years ago

    Just for context:

    http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecr.....sheet.html

    When a location was known, 65% of drownings among those 15 years and older occurred in natural water settings

    But I don't think that means this law makes sense. The level of danger is so variable by location you'll end up with some pretty silly prosecutions.

    1. John Thacker   14 years ago

      But that's a pretty irrelevant stat. It's saying that a fewer percentage of the drownings occur in pools-- where people don't use life jackets, of course, but there are more likely to be lifeguards-- but doesn't really report anything like percentage of use.

      Certainly the ocean is dangerous because of rip currents and the like, but that doesn't justify this any more than it justifies various tasty food bans.

      1. Heather the Safety Dog   14 years ago

        TASTY FOOD BANS???!!!!!!!!!11!1

    2. Bar Student   14 years ago

      If you don't know how to swim, don't get in the water. How simple is that?

    3. TomB   14 years ago

      "65% of drownings among those 15 years and older occurred in natural water settings"

      hmmmm, so considering the volume of the world's water is found in natural water settings probably over 99.99999% of the time, 65% isn't so bad...

  10. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

    Adults? Really? I swim in the fucking ocean without a life vest. I think I can manage streams and lakes.

    1. Statist   14 years ago

      No you can't.

    2. Ska   14 years ago

      The first thing I thought was NY will not be out-stated and ban swimming off of Long Island without a life vest or water wings. Maybe people 65 years old or older, and 5 years old or younger, shouldn't be allowed into the ocean at all. For our own good.

    3. Statist's Sidekick   14 years ago

      And your arrogant attitude proves you can't.

      1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

        It's true. I have been unmutual.

  11. Tim   14 years ago

    How do the fish manage without safety equipment and little neon vests?

  12. ola   14 years ago

    Supporters of this law: life vest renters, life vest sellers, life vest manufacturers, defense attorneys, cops, prosecuting attorneys, ticket writers, county treasurer, bail bondsman, life vest required sign installers......

    Opponents of this law: the normal jerk on the street.

    Well there you have it. New fine wins.

  13. Mainer   14 years ago

    "The latest sign that my entire childhood could be retroactively criminalized"

    I'm 54 years old, and I can't imagine what it must be like for kids growing up today. I guess I'm "lucky" I don't have kids of my own, or I'd be fighting this kind of shit all the time. But the real question that I ponder is will the kids growing up today be so conditioned that they'll be obedient little boot lickers, or will they swing the pendulum strongly the other way, and be the generation that saves this country. I don't know.

    1. Name Withheld   14 years ago

      The first one.

    2. Pablo   14 years ago

      Im 44 and regularly thank God that I could actually have fun and get into mischief when I was a kid. I too cannot imagine what its like these days. This reminds me of the laws requiring bike riders to wear helmets. When I was a kid anyone who wore one of those would get laughed out of the neighborhood.

      1. Name Withheld   14 years ago

        anyone who wore one of those would get laughed out of the neighborhood

        We just assumed they were retarded. Still do.

    3. Aelhues   14 years ago

      My concern is that with so much being fined or criminalized that a large portion of the country will accept breaking the law as an everyday occurrence. To some degree it already is, but as we add more and more stupid laws against everyday, slightly risky activities, disrespect for the law increases. While some people could stand to develop less respect for the law, overall, I think that is a negative for our society.

      1. Old Soldier   14 years ago

        I break laws everywhere I go. I speed, I let me dog off-leash in the park, I stop at the gas station on the way to the rifle range - with a rifle in my car, I walk over to my neighbor's house with an open beer, I ride my bike on the sidewalk, etc...

        My kids know right from wrong. Like me, they also know to keep an eye out for the cops. If you can't avoid them, act normal and pretend not to notice them when they show up.

        1. In Time of War   14 years ago

          And those of us who own aggressive dogs and keep them on a leash really appreciate that, as your uncontrolled animal fights ours while you stand across the park pathetically whining for "fluffy" to come back.
          "And usually my dog obeys so well..." Yeah, how many times have I heard that shit.

          1. Old Soldier   14 years ago

            I mean the state and national parks where I hike up mountains - not some stupid city park. I have a mastiff and don't want to have to apologize for anyone's dead beagle.

            1. In Time of War   14 years ago

              Sorry, I'm just touchy about the "on-leash" park thing. When I specifically go to an on-leash park and then get mobbed by other people's loose dogs, it irks me. And then they act like I'm the bastard because I don't want their dogs jumping on me or fighting with my dog.
              Anyway, yeah, in the wild 'n stuff, let 'em run. Just watch out for bears >:)

              1. Old Soldier   14 years ago

                I hear ya - the female mastiff I have now is pretty harmless. The last one (a male bullmastiff) did not take any shit from other males - as a few owners found out.

      2. sarcasmic   14 years ago

        The drug war has done more to cause lost respect for the law than anything else.
        Well, that and the use of traffic laws for the purpose of harassment and revenue.

      3. Rich   14 years ago

        Along these lines, my (admittedly subjective) observations have more drivers phoning and texting than before the bans were enacted.

        1. Old Soldier   14 years ago

          A why does everyone in Jersey who owns a Lexus drive with a smart-phone against their ear? Is the 30 seconds required to sync the bluetooth more than they can spare?

  14. SIGN   14 years ago

    -SWIM AT YOUR OWN RISK-

    -IF YOU DIE OR ARE INJURED, THE COUNTY WILL NOT PAY YOUR EXPENSES-

    -SWIMMING HERE CONFIRMS YOUR LEGAL ACCEPTANCE OF THESE TERMS-

    1. FINE PRINT   14 years ago

      ASSUMING YOU CAN READ THIS SIGN.

      1. Finer Print   14 years ago

        IF you can't read the sign, too bad.

  15. Tim   14 years ago

    It should also be illegal to put your head under and inhale.

    1. Levi Johnston   14 years ago

      Don't I know it!

  16. JW   14 years ago

    Note to self: Buy land in Montana for heirs. Also, guns and ammo.

    1. Mainstream Media   14 years ago

      Extremist Alert!

  17. Jeff Buckley's Ghost   14 years ago

    So where do I send my $86?

  18. Tim   14 years ago

    The floaties will just make it harder to get away from Steve Smith.

    1. SugarFree   14 years ago

      Steve doesn't eat where he shits.

      1. Tim   14 years ago

        There's fines for that also.

        1. SugarFree   14 years ago

          I'd hate to be the doomed LEO who tried to give Steve a citation. Would he try and ticket himself after Steve got done shitting him out in the river?

          1. Ska   14 years ago

            A cop giving a ticket to a cop. Hardy-har-har.

    2. Old Soldier   14 years ago

      Wide Reciever for the Panthers? Does he chase swimmers in the off-season?

  19. Dagny T.   14 years ago

    You can't exactly swim in a life jacket now can you, King County fucktards?

    I believe this will get enforced, too. My friends and I were threatened with tickets for riding in the back of a pickup on a short drive up a park road after tubing down a river. They were super vigilant about people's beer too. Way to ruin summer, jerks.

    1. SugarFree   14 years ago

      It's a feminist plot to cover up boobs.

      1. Dagny T.   14 years ago

        And the bulky life jacket covers up your cute swimsuit, so you may as well wear a shapeless sack. Then everyone will be equal in safety and joylessness.

        1. SugarFree   14 years ago

          Now you are catching on.

      2. Brett L   14 years ago

        Ok, NOW I'm pissed. I hadn't thought about that part. This must not pass. Bad enough the ski-boat chicks have to cover up. But on the beach?

    2. Robert   14 years ago

      What if you want to dive under water?

      1. EscapedWestOfTheBigMuddy   14 years ago

        This is not an approved activity, comrade.

  20. Mongol horde   14 years ago

    Not to give them any ideas, but why not require wearing vests in pools as well.

    Not sure how large king co. is but i would just drive to the next one and spent my beer money there.

    1. Episiarch   14 years ago

      King County has very little fun places to swim...wait, does this fucking apply to Lake Washington?!?

      1. jasno   14 years ago

        Hey, fuck you. I grew up rafting down the White river and swimming in the various duck-shit-filled ponds known as lakes. It's not Cancun, but it's still a blast once you get used to your balls doing a full retraction from the temperature.

        I can't imagine how people are going to jump off cliffs in green river gorge wearing a fucking lifejacket.

  21. rather   14 years ago

    The latest sign that my entire childhood could be retroactively criminalized

    Well, if you had cell phone pics instead of National Geographic magazines, masturbation would have been illegal too

  22. np   14 years ago

    "I think it's the beginning of the era of life jackets in King County," he said.
    lol

  23. bosty   14 years ago

    "We are improving the health for everyone because of these laws that we pass," she said.

    Which is why true believers frighten me more than corrupt assholes, who can at least be reasoned with. This twit really thinks she's saving the world.

    It's all part of the reason I root for Simon Phoenix whenever Demolition Man is on.

  24. Somalian Road Corporation   14 years ago

    I know some old folks who used to take rifles with them on the bus to school so they could put them in their lockers and hunt/target shoot after classes. The world didn't end.

    1. WTF   14 years ago

      Hell, when I was in high school, we used to bring our shotguns with us to school, in New Jersey so we could go hunting right after school, and nobody gave a shit. Damn, things sure have changed for the worse.

    2. Brett L   14 years ago

      By the time I was in high school, you couldn't bring them on the bus or into the school, but you could still go quail or deer hunting before school and leave your rifle or shotgun in the car in plain view of everyone.

      1. Fart who is old   14 years ago

        Now cartoons of guns are prohibited in schools.

        1. Principal   14 years ago

          "Mrs. Fart, it pains me to inform you that your son has be suspended for mentioning the existence of gun cartoons."

    3. Mainer   14 years ago

      Our fifth grade teacher taught us the gun safety course as part of our normal curriculum. I still have the little wallet card for taking that course.

  25. Heroic Mulatto   14 years ago

    According to the council's press release, this ordinance expires in October, which makes it even more aggravating

  26. Somalian Road Corporation   14 years ago

    The people talking about getting hassled for alcohol brought something to mind I hadn't thought about for a while. A few years ago I was walking from my apartment to a friend's party a few hundred feet away in the same gated complex . I was accompanied by a black chick I was having a fling with and we both had half-full beers in our hands.

    Unfortunately, we happened to run into a trio of Tempe, AZ's finest, who stopped us and demanded that we pour out our beers.

    SRC: "Wait, what? We're both of legal age and this is private property."

    Officer Cockbag: "Doesn't matter. You can't have an open container."

    SRC: "Seriously? I thought that was just for vehicles and the street. Can I please finish it? I'm just walking from my apartment to a friend's place, we both live here."

    OC: "No, it's not. You're going to have to empty them."

    We grudgingly comply with these heavily armed idiots and I check out the actual law later:

    http://www.azleg.gov/ars/4/00244.htm

    20. For a person to consume spirituous liquor in a public place, thoroughfare or gathering. The license of a licensee permitting a violation of this paragraph on the premises shall be subject to revocation. This paragraph does not apply to the sale of spirituous liquors on the premises of and by an on-sale retailer. This paragraph also does not apply to a person consuming beer from a broken package in a public recreation area or on private property with permission of the owner or lessor or on the walkways surrounding such private property or to a person consuming beer or wine from a broken package in a public recreation area as part of a special event or festival that is conducted under a license secured pursuant to section 4-203.02 or 4-203.03.

    It's so charming that ignorance of the law is only an excuse if you are professionally tasked with enforcing it. Of course, assuming ignorance here might be charitable on my part.

    1. sarcasmic   14 years ago

      I once had a cop say "Because I say so." in response to my saying "What do you mean? I'm not breaking the law."

      This db figured he could just make shit up and order people around because he had a club and a gun and knew that if the argument went to court the judge would side with him.

      He was right of course.

    2. Troy   14 years ago

      Yes, you the great unwashed have to know all the laws, regulations, ordinances, and rules perfectly. Pigs don't. Judges dont'...that's why they have appeals courts, so if superior court judges get it wrong.

  27. P Brooks   14 years ago

    the same arguements [...] made agains the life vest ordinance were also made against laws requiring child safety seats in automobiles and banning smoking in public places.

    "We ignored them then, and we are ignoring them now. And, down the road, when we outlaw scissors and knitting needles, we will continue to ignore them. SHUT UP! WE KNOW WHAT'S BEST FOR YOU."

  28. P Brooks   14 years ago

    They should require everyone in King County to wear a life vest 24 hours a day; just to be safe.

    1. Brandon   14 years ago

      And helmets, and safety goggles. But only from "approved" manufacturers.

  29. Resto Druid FTW   14 years ago

    Wow, this is sad. I'm glad I live in Snohomish county.

    1. sven   14 years ago

      Makes me want to move back there.

  30. Troy   14 years ago

    They should simply outlaw large bodies of water.

  31. P Brooks   14 years ago

    They should simply outlaw large bodies of water.

    They're just giant yucky toilets.

    1. David Shaff   14 years ago

      Not all are. I mean, anymore.

    2. dunkel   14 years ago

      Didn't some morons in Oregon just drain an entire reservoir because a dude pissed in it? They're one step ahead of us ...again!

      1. dunkel   14 years ago

        Damn you Shaff and your nimble fingers. you are a grade-a fuckstain, but a rapid typist.

      2. jasno   14 years ago

        Wow... Here's the link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-13874089

  32. Zuo   14 years ago

    I got ticketed for "jumping off the rocks" into the water before. All these things do is make the victim of the bullshit rule despise government and their petty tyranny. Win for Team Us, long term, I reckon.

  33. Joshua Corning   14 years ago

    King County a few years ago outlawed clearing brush on three acres of every 5 acres you own.

    A bunch of rural land owners had a real live tractor pull in down town Seattle in protest.

    Also i wonder if this law outlaws swimming in Lake Washington and Lake Union without a life vest..lake Union is in Seattle and lake Washington is at least partially in Seattle city limits.

    I don't mention Green lake cuz only and idiot would swim in Green lake.

  34. Brandon   14 years ago

    I sleep better at night knowing that Julia Patterson and everyone like her will die someday.

  35. Strawman Harry   14 years ago

    I can see a law being passed that anyone renting boats need to supply life vests. But, for private boat owners and swimmers?

  36. Al Wayswright   14 years ago

    Hey Julia Patterson, how dumb are you?

    There is no such thing as collective health. Health arises within any individual and from internal state of biochemical action.

    Health has nothing to do with safety.

    "We are improving the health for everyone because of these laws that we pass as you say Julia Patterson is an expression of idiocy.

    All that could happen is the reduced chance of drowning for some individuals, none of which has anything to do with health.

    Drowning isn't a contagious disease capable of fueling an epidemic.

    1. Julia Patterson   14 years ago

      U ignerant red neck, what if the ppl dies, and then the corpsman polluted teh watter suppleys??? that is y we need to protetc are children from ppl like u!

  37. CE   14 years ago

    "We are improving the health for everyone because of these laws that we pass," she said.

    And if safety were the only value to maximize, these laws would make sense. A few people drown in rivers every year. Tens of thousands die in car crashes -- why not make it illegal for cars to go over 20 miles per hour? Thousands are murdered every year. Why not make murder illegal?

  38. Mad Scientist   14 years ago

    I'd like to imagine that laws like this just encourage the next generation of libertarians, but I don't think it's the case. My mom tells me I had problems with authority from when I was a wee brat and would never do anything unless the "why" could be explained to me. So it's no surprise I get aggravated with government busybodies. But most of the people I know don't have the same reactions we'd like to imagine when shit like this happens. For example, bicycle helmet laws are stupid, but how often do you see kids breaking them? Most people knuckle under and follow the rules, no matter how asinine they are, and even tell themselves that it's for their own good.

    I'd like to see a study done, but my guess is incidents like this make more statists than libertarians.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Review: There Are No Top-Down Solutions to the Problems Depicted in Adolescence

Autumn Billings | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!