Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Mandatory Medicare

Entitlement or obligation?

Peter Suderman | From the July 2011 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

In October 2008 three senior citizens, including former House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Texas), sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. They wanted to opt out of Medicare, stay on their private health insurance plans, but still collect Social Security benefits. They did not ask for a refund of the taxes they'd paid into Medicare—just an exemption from enrollment without losing the Social Security benefits they'd funded for decades.

In March of this year, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Coll-yer ruled against the trio and in favor of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. "Plaintiffs are trapped in a government program intended for their benefit," Collyer wrote. "They disagree and wish to escape." But she concluded that there was "no loophole or requirement that the Secretary provide such a pathway."

Kent Brown, the lead attorney for the three seniors, said he plans to appeal. He warned that Collyer's ruling set an ominous precedent. By her logic, he said in a press statement, "an entitlement is now an obligation."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Muzzling Gun Rights

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (2)

Latest

Oregon's E-Cigarette Censorship Is Unconstitutional—and Makes No Sense

Jacob Sullum | 10.8.2025 12:01 AM

Democrats Are Proposing a 'Robot Tax' To Save Jobs From AI. Here's Why It Won't Work.

Kevin Frazier | 10.7.2025 4:50 PM

Republican Socialism: The Trump Administration Buys a Stake in Yet Another Company

Eric Boehm | 10.7.2025 4:30 PM

Is New Housing Popular?

Christian Britschgi | 10.7.2025 2:30 PM

Alligator Alcatraz Was Built on Secrecy, Expansive Emergency Powers, and an Unprecedented State Power Grab

C.J. Ciaramella | 10.7.2025 12:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300