Federal Financial Regulators to Ban Misleading Metaphors to Protect Investors
A memo was issued today by the financial consultancy the Horsesmouth warning that the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority are cracking down on the use of metaphors when advisors talk to clients:
SEC, FINRA Ban Investment Metaphors By Sean Ball
Government regulators announced today that financial professionals would be barred from using metaphors when speaking about the markets and investments.
In a joint release, the SEC and FINRA said new neuroscience research demonstrated conclusively that metaphors are actual things that exist inside people's brains.
"We can't have advisors just putting things inside people's brains," said SEC chair Mary Schapiro.
Under the proposed regulations, expected to take effect after a short comment period, advisors will have to immediately stop using a wide range of metaphors, including the long-standing favorite references to "bull" and "bear" markets.
Schapiro said the SEC and FINRA convened an unusual joint briefing with neuroscientists from Stanford and MIT to review recent research based on a new imaging technology, nanomagnetic resonance imaging (nMRI).
Scientists explained that images of the brain now display actual locations where specific thoughts and ideas exists, and that repeated use of certain words, phrases, and concepts literally grow and strengthen these regions of the brain.
"Metaphors are the equivalent of untested food additives," said Schapiro.
"It's clear from the research that any discussion of the market and its direction is totally metaphorical. The market is not a thing. We've got to stop talking about it vaulting, slipping, inching, bouncing, pushing, resisting, rebounding, rallying, and clawing. This is a sober business, not a Las Vegas cage fight."
She also said markets cannot "flirt" with anything.
Schapiro said FINRA will take the lead in offering guidance to advisors on how best to implement the new set of rules, called the CleanMind regs.
FINRA is expected to hire 50,000 new compliance officers who will act as "metaphor minders" and will spend their days sitting in meetings with advisors and their clients to ensure metaphor-less conversations.
"It's still fine for advisors to shoot the breeze with clients," Schapiro said. "But when it comes to actually discussing the markets and investments, they'll need to clean up their act. The metaphor minders will be there to help them bite the bullet on these poisonous phrases. It's a bitter pill but necessary."
Metaphor ban means far-reaching changes
Schapiro said the metaphor research has clear implications for the way markets operate, and especially their influence on pricing.
Most metaphors have a built-in bias in favor of a future expectation that prices will continue to go up. In order to dampen "expectation bias" in the investment process, Schapiro said she expected new market pricing reforms as part of the metaphor clean-up program.
Investments will be priced only once a day, at 9:30 a.m., and their prices will be totally random, thereby erasing price-rising market metaphors such as "momentum," "demand," "strength," and "weakness."
"Research is clear now. There really is no single 'market' out there. It's really a collection of totally separate companies with few actual connections. So the whole 'market' metaphor must go, and with it we'll lose other nasty metaphors such as 'crash,' 'swings,' and 'dips.'That's a good thing."
She added, "The only real 'invisible hand of the market' is what goes on underneath the anchor desk at CNBC."
Schapiro said that even though the metaphor-cleansing program is aimed at stemming undue influence over investors, there is a concern among FINRA officials that some advisors may also need help.
She pointed to "modern portfolio theory" as one deeply ingrained, problematic metaphor.
"You know, I'm not sure what's 'modern' about it, and as far as theories go, well, the flat Earth was a theory, too. So the compliance metaphor minders will certainly be looking at that one."
And you thought that Dodd-Frank was onerous! Enjoy your April lst.
Hat tip to Pamela Friedman.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
My god...I have such a low opinion of the state and what it's capable of, that for a minute I thought this headline was real.
"We can't have advisors just putting things inside people's brains," said SEC chair Mary Schapiro.
I know I shouldn't be, but I'm gobsmacked. Flabbergasted. Speechless.
*blinks eyes, shakes head*
Also lulz
"The metaphor minders will be there to help them bite the bullet on these poisonous phrases. It's a bitter pill but necessary."
What you did there? I see it...
..and my fave...
She added, "The only real 'invisible hand of the market' is what goes on underneath the anchor desk at CNBC."
Yeah buddy!
Policies banning metaphors would be a real turd sandwich.
In the punchbowl.
Metaphor
Fucking metaphors, how do they work?
April 1st, how does it work?
Like similes, only more obtusely.
Is this another parody post? Because if it is, I ain't got time for this shit.
So "safe as houses" or "like money in the bank" would be verboten?
It's probably all for the best.
First they came for the metaphors, and I did not speak up, because I was not a metaphor.
Then they came for similes...
Then they came for the oxymorons, and the Federal Regulators committed mass suicide and we were all safe again.
They can pull my zeugmas from my cold dead hands.
"Family, religion, friendship. These are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business."
You're right, zeugmas must stay! Smithers!
+ 3.14159...
I'm pi eyed right now...
Shoot, fooled me. Although this seriously wouldn't surprise me given our retarded government.
Btw the way, I would feel safer trapped in a market with a Bull than in a market with a Bear, so that particular metaphor is rather apt I think.
Thomas Friedman, weeping on the Today show, "How will I show the seeds to tell the trees my children need a ladder...despite the world being flat???"
Matt Lauer, "Uh...we're..."
Friedman (LOUD wailing) "Wail! sobbing...more sobbing ...smell of the children!!!"
Matt Lauer "we have to break for commercial"
Jingle for Depends
Announcer: "When you just can't hold all the sh*t in"
Also, for the love of God Muslims from countries in the Middle East and Central Asia, grow fucking thicker skin like the rest of the goddamn world.
I like the title of the story where they call it a "Protest." Fucking cowards in the media can't even call their behavior what it is.
Man burns religious text--->
Rampaging afghans murder 8 UN workers-->Head of Afghan 'parliament' (Ulema) declares outrage.... at the book burner. Demands US arrest him as "War Criminal"---->
Meanwhile, in unrelated news, US Generals report 'steady progress' being made in afghanistan
============================
I am still kind of fuzzy on how Mazari afghanis (who FWIW are technically supposed to be the comparatively 'chill & secular' afghans) connect the dots between a redneck Koran-burning pastor in central florida with... the United Nations Mission in afghanistan? Is it anytime someone does something anti-islamic, immediate reciprocity must be dealt out to the nearest International Aid Workers?
This sort of reminds of the US embassy in Islamabad being burnt down in 1979 because Ayatollah Khomeini spread a rumor that Americans and the Jews had attacked the Grand Mosque in Mecca...
...this is actually a little more depressing though. At least someone HAD attacked the Grand Mosque in 1979. In this case, it's just a rumor of a guy having burnt a book.
Seriously, give Afghanistan back to the Taliban. Then just nuke it. Progress will be made.
'Demands US arrest him as "War Criminal"---->'
Protests were held in several other Afghan cities on Friday - which demonstrators in Herat had called a "day of anger"
It is FUCK. ING. DAY. OF. RAGE!!
For the love of Allah, get that right!
I am Jack's raging bile duct.
Oh, no I'm not. I am Jack's funny bone.
Holy crap, I thought this was serious. Given the way things are going, it's actually pretty believable. Somebody should post this on the Huffington Post, minus the bit at the end, and see how many people there think it's a great idea.
I've always wanted to say this.
I slit the sheet. The sheet I slit, and on the slitted sheet I sit.
I be, she be, he be, you be they be...
April fools is like getting the train from Warty and STEVE SMITH.
This is really surprising.
Oh well, with my people skills I'm sure I won't have any problems getting out of there tomorrow.
I initially read the headline as "Man in Giant Bear..." etc.
I need to start drinking earlier on Fridays...
P Brooks|4.1.11 @ 12:52PM|#
"So "safe as houses" or "like money in the bank" would be verboten?
It's probably all for the best."
Think they can outlaw "lock boxes"?
Let me be clear - this regulation is the red-headed stepchild of regulations. But regulation in the face of stormclouds is no vicegrip. Two peas in a pod, let no man tear asunder. A gift horse is flat on its ass.
And that, my friends, is the solid gold truth.
Spoofing people into believing something implausible would be one thing, but this is just satire. The obliviously ironic statements were nicely executed though. 🙂
This isn't all that wacky, really, for a parody.
Analysts, for instance, are regulated internally within primary-dealer banks, and specifically forbidden to use Sporting or Gambling analogies/metaphors in either published communications (e.g. research notes, presentations, marketing) or in private written communications. The regulation was left sort of open-ended and it was the job of SA (supervisory analysts) & LCD (legal & compliance) to be sure that everything was monitored and if anything iffy crossed their desks, they'd flag it and you'd get a yellow card...
i think the SEC/FINRA specific rules were/are fairly vague, which pushed banks to come up with their own language-policing system for lack of more specific guidance from the Regulators. I recall from the series 63 & 87 (legal & compliance) tests that, "exaggerating / misleading / vague language" could be subject to scrutiny and be the basis for losing your certification as an analyst. But the standard for what qualified as such was pretty vague. Most analysts tended to just write whatever they wanted, and learn where the limits were when the SAs refused to publish things or LCD put their foot down.
That said... the way people talked on phones was pretty metaphortastic. One of the most common was 'Company X "shitting the bed"' on an earnings call...
"We can't have advisors just putting things inside people's brains," said SEC chair Mary Schapiro.
You go, Girl!
Enjoy your April lst.
You're not supposed to telegraph it like that.
Are similies OK?
fuck, someone beat me to it.
Scary that I read half way through before I decided this had to be a joke.
Green Energy Company on the move!
New Government-Subsidized Solar/Wind Industry!!
PENNY stock new Plankton-Energy company!! ON THE MOVE.
California Bullet-Train BONDS!!! Like money in a lock box.
IT'S AN APRIL FOOLS JOKE!!! PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GOD - LET IT BE AN APRIL FOOL'S JOKE!
In a joint release, the SEC and FINRA said new neuroscience research demonstrated conclusively that metaphors are actual things that exist inside people's brains.
Gave it away too early! But the joke still really is on us, because one day this story will be reality. You know it to be true.
Half the popsci interpretations of neuroscience research seem to be like this. "There are actual physical changes that correspond to state of mind X!? This changes everything!" Why are these discoveries such surprises? Even mind dualism proponents usually admit that physical brains correlate with their associated minds, even if they're a little fuzzy on the causative links.
does anybody have a link to the sec/finra announcement itself? I cannot find anything when I google this other than two or three sites that refer to the horsemouth article.