Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Science & Technology

Here's Your Jetpack (Sort Of)

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 1.31.2011 10:24 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Come March, that jetpack you've been promised all these years will finally be available. Sadly, it will (a) be water-powered, (b) have a top speed of 22mph and a maximum height of 33 feet, and (c) cost $99,500. So your commute is still going to suck. Still: Jetpack!

Via Engadget.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason Morning Links: From Cairo to Davos

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

Science & TechnologyTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (63)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. ClubMedSux   14 years ago

    Unless that water hose is at least 13 miles long my commute will indeed still suck.

  2. Tim   14 years ago

    Looks like more of a Wetpack.

    1. ClubMedSux   14 years ago

      Racist!

  3. Mister DNA   14 years ago

    Jetpacks was yes!

  4. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    I can literally put out fires on the way to and from my job figuratively putting out fires.

    1. IceTrey   14 years ago

      Maybe if the fire was on a boat but that's about it.

  5. Mark   14 years ago

    There is another option:

    http://www.martinjetpack.com/

    1. Old Mexican   14 years ago

      That's not a jet pack! We wants a JET pack, precioussss!

  6. Jim   14 years ago

    Why does everyone say we were promised jet packs? I don't recall this promise. But I remember being promised Tang.

    1. robc   14 years ago

      I blame Gilligan's Island. They made it clear that jetpacks were the wave of the future in that one episode with the jetpack.

      1. robc   14 years ago

        Season 3, Episode 27: It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's Gilligan!

        A James Bond-like jet pack lands on the island. The castaways believe they can use it to signal the Navy search party looking for it. Even with the jet pack Gilligan as usual messes up any rescue attempts.

        /Is there anything wikipedia cant do?

        1. Wind Rider   14 years ago

          Isn't that the episode where Ginger, Marianne, and the Professor. . .naaaaaah

        2. Ice Nine   14 years ago

          >>Is there anything wikipedia cant do?

          Comprehensively provide objective facts.

          1. robc   14 years ago

            Are you saying that episode descriptions of Gilligan's island arent objective facts?

            And it appeared to be pretty comprehensive too.

            1. Ice Nine   14 years ago

              >Looking vainly for the noun (Gilligan's) "island" in my reply. Finding only "wikipedia".> Question does not compute.

              1. robc   14 years ago

                You said wikipedia cant provide objective facts. Considering it was in response to a post of mine in which I quoted objective facts from wikipedia, Gilligan's Island fucking disproves your point.

                Which is just sad for you.

                1. Ice Nine   14 years ago

                  The only sad thing in your thread is your apparent partiality in your last post to (in order):
                  the Straw Man Fallacy, that allows you to attack what you (incorrectly) claim that I said rather than what I actually said;
                  the Fallacy of Appeal to Authority, that allows you to present Wikipedia, which is widely known to be not 100% reliable because of the biases of its contributors, as infallible;
                  the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization, that allows you to think that one entry amongst the millions in Wikipedia proves anything 'comprehensive' about it.
                  That makes it a pointless thread that I'm getting out of, now. Ciao.

        3. Ezra Klein   14 years ago

          Gilligan didn't mess up, never it did.

          It was all a metaphor for the military industrial complex screwing up society then blaming the working class.

          1. EJ Dionne   14 years ago

            And how society wouldn't do anything about how fat the captain was.

      2. Bugs   14 years ago

        When I was a kid, there was (briefly) a show called "The 21st Century." It was a a documentary series hosted by Walter Cronkeit, and its subject was all the cool stuff we'd have in the 21st Century. Like computers that could sing "Daisy" and everyone sleeping under mylar space blankets and, yes, jet packs. And like everyone, I have a computer that can sing "Daisy," I do sleep under a mylar space blanket, but I still have no jet pack. I blame Walter Cronkeit. "Most trusted man in America" indeed. Snake oil salesman is more like it.

        1. Walter Cronkeit   14 years ago

          And that's the way it was...

          1. Bugs   14 years ago

            You bastard, I want my jet pack!

        2. Nick   14 years ago

          I wasn't aware the 21st Century was over.

          1. Doomed!   14 years ago

            Well, spluh. But with only two years left do you really think there is time?

            1. Nick   14 years ago

              I'll concede. The Mayans never said shit about jet packs.

              1. TheZeitgeist   14 years ago

                They did have space capsules though.

  7. Timon19   14 years ago

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W.....d_Jetpacks

  8. P Brooks   14 years ago

    I'll wait for the teleporter.

    1. Episiarch   14 years ago

      "Enterprise, what we got back didn't live long...fortunately."

      1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

        Don't forget The Fly!

    2. McCoy   14 years ago

      If Star Trek taught us anything, it's that the transporter is riskier than chainsaw juggling.

      1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

        And the holodeck is mechanized suicide.

        1. fresno dan   14 years ago

          Is the holodeck the MOST ridiculous thing on TV???

          Every male who had access to the thing would use it for ONE THING ONLY non-stop f*cking - sure, there might be some variation - geeks would want those blue cat women from Avatrar, but I would be the warden of naked asian women's prison.

          1. robc   14 years ago

            They covered that in DS9, with the holo-suites that Quark rented.

          2. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

            Yes, but the bigger problem is that the holodeck can kill you, pretty much on a monthly basis. Oops, safety protocols busted again.

            1. SugarFree   14 years ago

              Or the characters escape again and the ship is filled with triple-breasted superhookers.

              It's not as fun as it sounds. Trust me.

              1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

                Of course, the reason for so many episodes set in the holodeck, was, of course, the same reason TOS kept finding Earth-parallel worlds--money, money, and, furthermore, money.

                1. SugarFree   14 years ago

                  And don't forget that magic fantasy "technology" is easier to write about than the boring old nuts and bolts type.

                  1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

                    True enough. I prefer ripping holes in the fabric of space-time and walking through them. Fewer existential questions that way.

      2. joshua corning   14 years ago

        Screw Star Trek...if you really want to be scared of transporters read the short story "Think Like a Dinosaur"

        The outer limits episode of it is not bad either.

  9. NotSure   14 years ago

    Sorry for the language, but that thing is an utter piece of shit, the point of a jetpack is that one can travel further than 30m. It would be like someone would builds a bumper car and then saying it is a wondrous new invention that will change our lives.

  10. Brett L   14 years ago

    I'll wait for the cordless model.

  11. micsolana   14 years ago

    Um, that music is phenomenal.

    1. tomhynes   14 years ago

      Pretty sure the music is from an 80's porn flick. Not sure which one, I will look and get back to you.

  12. Barely Suppressed Rage   14 years ago

    Better be sure you've paid your water bill before firing it up. Falling from 33 feet in the air when they shut off your service would be a bitch.

  13. Old Mexican   14 years ago

    I still prefer Little Nellie.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJdi-rNcEVc

  14. Bugs   14 years ago

    I wonder if a pumper truck hooked up to a fire hydrant would enable you to run this thing on land. You could rescue people from burning buildings and stuff. Everyone else would drown, but it would still be pretty cool.

    1. The Hoser   14 years ago

      Up, up, and nearby!

    2. IceTrey   14 years ago

      Or you could just use a ladder.

      1. Bugs   14 years ago

        Yeah, but it wouldn't be as cool.

  15. SIV   14 years ago

    You can see what's left of the old jetpacks at the Fort Eustis Museum of Military Transportation.

    1. Wind Rider   14 years ago

      I couldn't possibly care less what they have at that lame-O sideshow at Fort Eusless. There is no way that I'm going to plan on spending time in 'The Old Dominion' Commonwealth of lost Virginity. Particularly not in the fucking penalty corner of that shithole of a state.

      1. T   14 years ago

        Nice rant. Now show us on the doll where VA touched you, mmkay?

      2. SIV   14 years ago

        The sucky part of Virginia is up near DC.

  16. Tim   14 years ago

    You know who could use these? Somali Pirates...

    1. Pirate   14 years ago

      Arrrrrready have'm, matey!

  17. Wind Rider   14 years ago

    Hey, look at us! We came up with a crappier, more expensive, and less capable version of something someone else already made almost 50 years ago! Probably with a slide rule, no less! Woo Hoooooo!

  18. Barely Suppressed Rage   14 years ago

    You'd look like a real hoser using one of those things.

  19. TheZeitgeist   14 years ago

    They had one of these at the Grand Prix of Monaco out in the harbor last year impressing the beautiful people. It was awesome, remember a guy flying it right into the fantail of its mother-yacht.

    1. SIV   14 years ago

      Monaco-class yachts are why I defy my personal gambling ban and buy a single lottery ticket when the jackpot gets really big. I NEED >30m of boat.

  20. joshua corning   14 years ago

    To be perfectly honest the internet, and smart phones are better then Jetpacks and flying cars.

    1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

      Better still are the Internet, high-powered computing, smartphones, jetpacks, flying cars, space colonies, robot slaves, immortality, and robot slaves for our robot slaves. Oh, and fusion!

  21. Leroy   14 years ago

    This is a perfect way to commute to and from land from our off-shore floating libertarian paradise!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Haste Begets Lawlessness

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 12:01 AM

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Female Nude Spa in Washington Can't Bar Transgender Clients With Male Genitalia, Federal Court Rules

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 4:20 PM

Trump Cut Funds From Wasteful Projects To Spend on Wasteful Statue Garden

Joe Lancaster | 6.3.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!