Naomi Klein Abandons Shock Doctrine Documentary
As Johan Norberg carefully explained in our October 2008 issue, Naomi Klein's wildly popular book The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism offered a distorted and factually incorrect caricature of libertarian economist Milton Friedman. So naturally a documentary version couldn't be far behind. Yet as The Independent (UK) reports, Klein and filmmaker Michael Winterbottom simply could not agree on the finished product. But the anti-capitalist show must go on:
Winterbottom's work, which is to be broadcast on [BBC channel] More4 on 1 September, has led to such insurmountable creative tensions that Klein, who originally came on board to narrate the film and act as a consultant, does not appear in the credits as a writer or consultant, or act as its narrator.
A source at Channel 4 said the writer was so disappointed with Winterbottom's vision of her book - which she reportedly felt did not carefully lay out the thesis or explain the economics but instead made unproven assertions - that she sought to distance herself from the film after seeing the early cuts.
Wow, the thing really must be awful for Klein—who's no stranger to "unproven assertions"—to be backpedalling so furiously. Perhaps she'd rather watch Norberg tell Reason.tv what's wrong with The Shock Doctrine:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe she was upset because it wasn't full of her unproven assertions.
Or maybe she wanted disproven assertions (her stock in trade) rather than mere unproven assertions.
🙂
A source at Channel 4 said the writer was so disappointed with Winterbottom's vision of her book - which she reportedly felt did not carefully lay out the thesis or explain the economics but instead made unproven assertions
The vague subject referent in that sentence pretty much says it.
It makes me kind of sad that Michael Winterbottom turns out to be such a douche bag. 24 Party People is one of my favorite movies.
I meant *24 Hour Party People*
Hahahahaha! Fuck Naomi Klein, yo.
Does this mean the documentary is about how Milton Friedman was awesome?
Reason Flashback Threads:
joe whining Reason has not done an in-depth analysis of Shock Doctrine.
joe not commenting when an in-depth analysis is put up.
Anyone making a documentary disparaging Milton Friedman should be locked in a room with Michael Moore and a bottle of KC Masterpiece, hickory flavor.
Who else laughed originally when they heard of Naomi Klein's premise in the Shock Doctrine?
I read it way back whenever, and thought;
"Wait... She's saying that after a disaster government gets........ smaller???"
It's doubly hilarious how painfully and devastatingly she was refuted by Rahm Emanuel some months back. I had hoped she might disappear for good after that, but alas... no such luck.
SugarFree, that reminds me: joe sucked.
24 Hour Party People was unwatchable after Curtis's suicide.
insurmountable creative tensions
"Seriously, you can't say that."
"Why not?"
"Well, to begin with, it's not true."
"So?"
Does joe know that he has achieved the status of immortal legend here?
More 4 is not a BBC channel. It's part of the commercially-funded Channel 4 stable (predominantly left-leaning all the same).
"did not carefully lay out the thesis or explain the economics but instead made unproven assertions "
Pot, kettle, I believe you two have met...
More4 is a Channel 4 station, not BBC (though C4 is also publicly owned - and, politically, makes the Beeb look like Fox News).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_4
Does joe know that he has achieved the status of immortal legend here?
On par with Lone Wacko, I believe.
You know who I miss? Stevo Darkly. He was a funny guy. He must have gotten a job or something.
I think of joe as more of a folk memory than a legend.
I think of joe as more of a folk memory than a legend.
Like something people tell their children about to scare them into behaving.
Maybe the yenta just didn't feel that associating Milton and free market economics with ECT was a good idea in light of much documented communist governmental use of ECT to modify behavior and her affinity to that form of rule.
I'd like to make a documentary called The Sock Doctrine. We would get various lefty feminists and anti-capitlists and forcibly make them smell dirty socks, then ask them, "What do you think of capitalism now?", and document their responses. Ms. Klein could wear a tight fitting blouse, show some cleavage, and narrate the transitions.
You know who I miss? Stevo Darkly. He was a funny guy. He must have gotten a job or something.
He and the rest of his kind crossed the ocean to the Undying Lands at the end of the War of the Troll.
A little googling turned up this NYT article which noted that the new Ecuadoran president Rafael Correa got a PhD from U of Illinois and was no fan of U Chicago economist Milton Friedman. This was noted by Naomi Klein in her interview with Charlie Rose. Sucks to see a great man's name dragged through the mud like that.
I'm not too worried about capitalism in Latin America, though. It shouldn't be long before Klein's fave Latin leftist robs Ecuador of its democracy, if he has not already. The American left is betting on good times for Ecuador too (pdf) so it will be interesting to see how it all plays out.
The failure of Naomi Klein to narrate this documentary is a catastrophe, that will be used by the government as an excuse to close down its one remaining office building, located in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and officially declare a state of free-market anarchy.
I was lounging about in my house in R'yleh when a minion bore unto me the echo of my whispered name.
Bless you, R C Dean.
I'm afraid I got distracted and spread thin. There is so much Internet to explore, so little time.
Plus I'm currently working on a project where I spend only 9-10 hours a day instead of 18 hours a day at the office, but I'm spending almost that entire time actually working instead of managing my time poorly. It wears a body out.
But I'm always with you in spirit.
The shock doctrine is a great book. Only retards who can't read or write would argue differently. Yes, those who would seek to impose capitalism through torture would pretend they disagree, but the only thing that really upsets them is that their views are exposed for what they really are.
Oooooooooooh, are the poor little torturers upset because their god Friedman was shown to support torture in the name of freedom? Oooooooooh, poor little children.... But don't cry too much. The media's going to give you plenty of airtime to peddle your lies....
Ah, whatever. Who cares what these little snakes think?
Norberg speeks about a free market that is an illusion and childish misrepresentation. There are no major free markets today and influences exerted on markets by corporate marketeers is greater than ever and goes generally unchallanged, if not subsidized for political advantage.
The Soviets had it right.