How the Other Half Lives
Joan Rivers celebrates capitalism on How'd You Get So Rich?
Have you seen that new ABC sitcom starring Kelsey Grammer as a 9-year-old Cuban immigrant who moves to America without a dime in his pocket, pays his way through high school and Harvard by scrubbing toilets and investing wisely in the stock market, turns his small fortune into a big fortune by inventing a new, environmentally friendly way to dry clean clothes, marries a fertile hottie who loves shopping for expensive shoes and having children, and lives happily ever after in a 12-bedroom mansion originally owned by three-time Cy Young Award winner Pedro Martinez?
Probably not, because no such thing exists and ABC will never make it. And not because it would be easier to turn a sackful of Chicken McNuggets into a live rooster than it would be to get Kelsey Grammer to play anything but another facsimile of Frasier Crane, much less a 9-year-old Cuban boy. The major obstacle? Hollywood loves businessmen and entrepreneurship like Bernie Madoff loved SEC regulators: Sure, they made his job easier, but that, it seems, only increased his contempt for them.
In 2006, the Business & Media Institute, an arm of the Media Research Council designed to expose the "anti-free enterprise culture of the media," released a report, "Bad Company," that examined the portrayal of businessmen on TV's top-rated dramas during the sweeps weeks of May and November 2005. "On primetime television, victims were 21 times more likely to be kidnapped or murdered by businessmen than the mob," the report states. "Businessmen also committed crimes five times more often than terrorists and four times more often than street gangs." Of the 129 episodes BMI reviewed, 39 featured businessmen as primary characters or plots alluding to commerce. According to BMI's reviewers, 77 percent of these 39 episodes qualified as "anti-business."
Every once in a while, though, Hollywood throws capitalism a bone, and this summer, the bone comes in the form of How'd You Get So Rich?, a TV Land reality series starring Joan Rivers that follows the template laid out by Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous 25 years ago and kept alive by Cribs throughout this decade: Invade a millionaire's house with a camera crew, then string together a dazzling montage of literal money shots—the $50,000 chandelier, the $100,000 outdoor kitchen, the Godzilla-sized bedroom closet that looks like it swallowed a Prada boutique whole.
To get on How'd You Get So Rich?, however, you don't have to be famous or blessed with rare artistic or athletic talent. You just have to own at least one bedspread that costs more than most people pay in taxes each year, and be brave enough to stay in the general vicinity of Joan Rivers as she cackles like the world's most endearing serial killer and paws at your granite counter-tops. Also it doesn't hurt to be an immigrant, a college drop-out, or a jilted housewife who lost it all when her husband dumped her. As its name suggests, How'd You Get So Rich? is interested in wealth creation as well as wealth, particularly the rags-to-riches kind.
That's an obvious strategy to employ in these tough economic times, but also a rare one. More typical of Hollywood is Kelsey Grammer's real new ABC sitcom, in which he plays Hank Pryor, a "Wall Street legend" who loses his job as a CEO and has to move his family from their ritzy Manhattan palace to a shabby suburban tract house in Hank's small hometown of River Bend. The series premieres September 30th, but you don't have to be Criss Angel to see where this is headed. True wealth, Hank is no doubt going to learn, lies in sharing the same bathroom as your kids, spending quality time with your wife as you argue over phone bills, and hoping that healthcare reform happens before your gall bladder explodes. Or something like that.
Rivers, on the other hand, loves money like only a batty old Rodeo Drive matron parodying herself to the nth degree can love money. In the opening credits of How'd You Get So Rich?, she fans herself with wads of money as her funky theme songs pulses in the background and title graphics straight off a No Limit album cover circa 1998 flash across the screen. The hip-hop trappings are no accident, of course—gangsta rap is pretty much the only genre of American entertainment that preaches ?the virtues of hard work and entrepreneurial daring on a regular basis. But Rivers seems determined to take such messages out of the ghetto and expose them to mainstream America, so she gets in her car and sets off in search of chatty self-made millionaires who aren't adverse to a little free publicity.
Even when she's just buttonholing people on the street as they exit luxury retailers or drive past in expensive sports cars, she turns up some interesting characters. The guy who came from India with a $50 nest egg and started a website for "sugar daddies" looking to lease fresh flesh. The guy who slept under a pier for three weeks when he moved to Los Angeles and ended up making millions in the video game industry. The woman whose cosmetics company supplies camouflage face-paint to the Department of Defense.
And the people whose homes Rivers tours are even more intriguing. Take, for example, Jonah Hill, an NFL hopeful who moved into a cave after his football career stalled at the college level, then decided his future lay in mail-order. A chance encounter with a prank-loving dental student led to the formation of Billy Bob Teeth Company, the world's leading purveyor of comically ugly choppers. Now, Hill lives on massive country estate in Illinois and is so rich he blows off steam by destroying trucks with his very own bulldozer.
Ultimately, the interviews Rivers conducts never get much deeper than the opulent wading pool at the Florida mansion Versace once lived in (which is now owned by a college drop-out who made his fortune in the long-distance calling industry). But what's there is enough to make you wonder why Hollywood doesn't explore such dramatically rich territory more fully. Sure, we've got the comically self-serving and devious Jack Donaghy of 30 Rock, and the tragically self-serving and devious sad men of Sterling Cooper—but wouldn't it be nice to see a completely virtuous businessman once in a while too? Picture, for example, Kelsey Grammer as a young upstart who successfully navigates the mail-order business, creates dozens of jobs in his community, shores up the local economy, and funds a range of charitable operations, all the while wearing a pair of Billy Bob teeth. It's too late for the current season, but maybe if How'd You Get So Rich? is a hit, we'll get to see it next time around.
Contributing Editor Greg Beato is a writer living in San Francisco. Read his Reason archive here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe our problem is that Joan Rivers is our spokesthing. Can we convince her to go commie?
strike through16 years agoEvery once in a while...Hollywood throws capitalism a bone
Or a turd disguised as a bone? Capitalism as an ostentatious flaunting of wealth? No thanks.
You mean Michael Moore's new movie, Capitalism: A Love story, isn't the advocumentary we've been waiting for?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rHP9W9FI-0
This show is damned good and truly inspiring. It makes you proud to be an American.
Joan Rivers is hilarious and does a terrific job as host.
Lookit! I made a documentary and it turns out everything I already believed really is true! I proved it with cameras!
Have you considered the possibility that the reason "Hollywood" favors entertainment that casts businessmen as villians is that such portrayals are what the market rewards?
Joan Rivers is still alive?
parse, dude, you just blew my fucking mind.
parse, they also show those businessmen cheating or lying or screwing some employee and that's why they are villains. They also show regular businessmen who don't suck but you don't notice them because they aren't meant to be a villain or a hero. Hollywood doesn't make a movie about someone going about their normal day being successful. There's no story there.
I wonder how many of the subjects of this show will offer "rent-seeking" as how they got rich.
X, silicone zombies never die.
exception to general comments: "The Pursuit of Happyness" - IMHO, a moving tribute to hard work, persistance, nerve, and succeeding despite the gov'ts best efforts to keep a man down (like taking his last few dollars out of his checking account to pay a back IRS bill and putting the guy out on the street as a result). Never read the book so not sure how far from reality the movie strayed....enjoyed it in any case.
I dated a few cougars in my day and loved it. No drama, great sex and I was not paying for everything all the time. It was really chill. Try this out:
**== Cougarster.com ==**
But let me tell all you young guys that want a cougar. eat your veggies and hit the gym cause they will ware you out...
Kudos to Joan Rivers for being honest about the effects of hysterectomy! In the new book about hysterectomy, THE H WORD, Chapter 48 is titled "Joan Rivers"Liars: hysterectomy didn't improve sex life." You can read about how hysterectomy ruins sex at http://www.hersfoundation.org.
Joan Rivers triggers cougar spam.
Yuck.
silicone zombies never die.
It is true that her last biodegradable components were replaced a long time ago.
Joan Rivers ROCKS, I think she has been around since the beginning of time!
RT
http://www.anonymity.se.tc
"wealth creation"
Nice try, Reason. No doubt Joan will be spackling over how each of these "entrepeneurs" actually stole the work of the common man to build himself that gold-plated empire so worthy of a visit from TV Land.
Wealth creation? Out of thin air? HA! Wealth theft, more like it.
"On primetime television, victims were 21 times more likely to be kidnapped or murdered by businessmen than the mob," the report states.
In other news, there are still people who watch prime time television dramas.
I wonder how many of these folks got rich asking for clicks on their "Donate Now!" link?
I got rich asking difficult questions to those in power and uploading the results onto YouTube.
Joan Rivers triggers cougar spam
I first read that as 'sperm'. **Shudders**
Thanks, mantooth. Now I feel guilty for not donating.
Johnny L.,
You should totally make that infomercial and see if Messr. Kelly sues you.
Citing Lifestyles Of The Rich And Famous and Cribs as an incentive to watch this production is like citing diarrhea as an incentive to eat Mexican street food.
I saw his character as more of a materialistic social-climbing dickhead. Usually rags-to-riches stories show the character generally liked before they get rich. But this guy was a jerk to all of the little guys (while sucking up to the rich stockbrokers)- constantly imposed on his friend and finally ran him off over a few bucks, which he willingly lent to his new boss, elbowing homeless people out of line at the shelter, etc. And it didn't show him going back to help any of the little guys after he made it, which you would expect in that type of story.
Hey, it's Jonah White not Hill. I should know, I went to school with him. It's a true rags to riches story. His father, a native american archeologist/anthropologist built the house he grew up in authentic Tudor style. Post & beam, wattle walls, dirt floor with no plumbing or electricity (at first anyway). Living in a cave was no big stretch for him.
Preemptive "Shut the fuck up, Tony".
"You mean Michael Moore's new movie, Capitalism: A Love story, isn't the advocumentary we've been waiting for?"
Moore is a hypocrite. He despises capitalism, yet uses it to line his pockets.
And maintain a warehouse full of Twinkies. Man's gotta snack between meals, y'know.
How did you get so rich?
Insider trading.
...
CUT!
Some demand does exist for showing how real business people do their thing. Billy Mays and his partner Anthony Sullivan showed entrepreneurs in action on their well regarded Discovery Channel reality series "Pitch Men," which we unfortunately won't see more of because of Mays's death. The History Channel then came out with its downmarket version of a business realty series called "Pawn Stars."
Why the jab at Jack Donaghy? The man is a genius!
Liz Lemon: I thought your event was tonight! Why are you wearing a Tuxedo?
Jack: It's after 6. What am I, a farmer!?
Hollywood doesn't mind people getting rich, as long as they pay high taxes, donate to socially acceptable causes, don't support conservative causes or politicians, didn't convert underutilized natural resources to productive uses, and didn't offer gainful employment to starving third world citizens.
As a matter of fact, there is a place where they've considered that possibility... and concluded that it is indeed the reason why Hollywood keeps bashing big corporations:
http://www.cracked.com/article_16458_5-terrible-life-lessons-hollywood-loves-teach-you.html
Check lesson #3 for the details.
I don't understand why Hollywood has such an "anti-capitalist" reputation. Actors, musicians, screen writers, directors and all the support people in this industry hustle much like other entrepreneurs to produce films, TV shows, music albums, etc. as money-making business ventures, entirely dependent on their customers' discretionary spending for their success. And people want to spend money on these products for their own pleasure, or for the pleasure of their children. They don't feel that way about the money they have to pay to other private businesses in the forms of rent, insurance premiums and interest on debt.
Jonah Hill is that unfunny fat fuck. Jonah WHITE is Billy Bob Teeth.
I proved it with cameras!
And very, very clever editing.
Those two words cannot exist in the same sentence. Try again and resubmit.
as a 9-year-old Cuban immigrant who moves to America without a dime in his pocket, pays his way through high school and Harvard by scrubbing toilets and investing wisely in the stock market, turns his small fortune into a big fortune by inventing a new, environmentally friendly way to dry clean clothes, marries a fertile hottie...
Perhaps ABC refrains from making such a show because it is, well, impossible.
Let's start with the fun one. He pays for Harvard by scrubbing toilets? That's a pretty tough job, given that he would need to work in excess of 4500 hours a year to pay his tuition bill, assuming he makes the toilet-scrubber standard of $7.25.
So he invested "wisely" in the stock market with the massive excesses he earned while toilet scrubbing?. I am a bit confused by the term "wisely". If you mean "wisely" as in "a diversified portifolio of stocks and bonds", he didn't make a dime in the last decade. If by "wisely" you mean "he leveraged himself, made some wild bets, and got lucky", your hero isn't all that heroic or sympathetic.
Then you get to the "invention" part of it all. Honestly, few "inventions" are solely the product of one person. They are usually collaborations among many, with many competitors doing nearly the same thing. Which ones win has more to do with marketing, timing, and luck than the invention itself.
On primetime television, victims were 21 times more likely to be kidnapped or murdered by businessmen than the mob
What's the "real" ratio?
Businessmen also committed crimes five times more often than terrorists
Hell, that's probably a vast UNDER-STATEMENT of the "real" ratio. It should be 500 to 1, not 5 to 1.
and four times more often than street gangs
This one probably is off in the way you expect.
That makes you one for three I guess.
I hope they do an episode on Cesar Milan. There's a true american success story that begins with a beaner jumping the fence and working illegaly in California and ends with a very wealthy dog whisperer. Hard work and innovation finds a niche market and a green card.
So Chad... Still railing against those SUV's huh?
I do love how you say; "That makes you one for three I guess." while providing jack-shit for support for anything you've asserted about how awful business people are.
Have you ever had a job? I'm curious.
Probably not, because no such thing exists and ABC will never make it. And not because it would be easier to turn a sackful of Chicken McNuggets into a live rooster than it would be to get Kelsey Grammer to play anything but another facsimile of Frasier Crane, much less a 9-year-old Cuban boy. The major obstacle? Hollywood loves businessmen and entrepreneurship like Bernie Madoff loved SEC regulators: Sure, they made his job easier, but that, it seems, only increased his contempt for them.
Maybe you could get Danny DeVito. He did Other People's Money.
My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I'm sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won't get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there's more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp. I'm not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that! It's just that he, like many types of religionists, seems to take it literally, take it straight...the Bible's books were not written by straight laced divinity students in 3 piece suits who white wash religious beliefs as if God made them with clothes on...the Bible's books were written by people with very different mindsets
I'm not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that! It's just that he, like many types of religionists, seems to take it literally, take it straight...the Bible's books were not written by straight laced divinity students in 3 piece suits who white wash religious beliefs as if God made them with clothes on...the Bible's books were written by people with very different mindsets
is good
Thanks