Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

World

What? Other Countries Have Elections Too?

Jesse Walker | 2.9.2009 9:45 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

RealClearWorld predicts the five most important elections of 2009. The countries involved are Afghanistan, Japan, Germany, Iran, and Israel; you'll have to read the article to see the arguments for the elections' importance -- and to find out what a "Jamaican coalition" is.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Never Learn Not to Panic

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

WorldIsraelJapanGermanyIranAfghanistan
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (31)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sage   16 years ago

    Isn't Venezuela having one in about a week?

  2. Xeones   16 years ago

    I bought some Jamaican Coalition from this guy named Crocodile last week...

  3. BDB   16 years ago

    Iran, by far, will be the most interesting.

  4. Xeones   16 years ago

    Isn't Khatami looking at another bid?

  5. SugarFree   16 years ago

    "What? Other Countries Have Elections Too?"

    They just do it to annoy us.

  6. Reinmoose   16 years ago

    I was really looking forward to reading about how important or pivotal the Japanese and German elections would be this year, but all I got was a "it probably won't be any different than it is now."
    What a waste of an article theme. Just stick with the ones about which you have something to say

  7. Officer Barbrady   16 years ago

    Nothing to see here. Move along.

  8. Episiarch   16 years ago

    Leela: Look, I know there are no car chases but this is important. One of these two men will become president of the world.

    Fry: What do we care? We live in the United States.

    Leela: The United States is part of the world.

    Fry: Wow! I have been gone a long time.

  9. Balloon Maker   16 years ago

    Bunch of Commie-Nazis if you ask me

  10. BDB   16 years ago

    "Xeones | February 9, 2009, 9:57am | #
    Isn't Khatami looking at another bid?"

    Yes, and he's favored right now because of the oil price collapse. It's making Ahmadenijad look like an idiot (well, he is one anyway, but this makes him look like more of one).

    Nobody in Iran gives a rats ass about the Palestinians or Israel when their own economy is in shambles.

  11. BDB   16 years ago

    IOW, A-mad is kind of turning out to be the George W. Bush of Iran. He hated him because he's so similar.

  12. John Mighty   16 years ago

    I cant help but wonder if elections in those countries are bought and paid for like the US.

    RT
    http://www.Privacy-Center.net

  13. Curious George   16 years ago

    Yeah I'll be real surprised if the Christian Democrats win in Iran. Is this a joke or what?

    In Iran a free election consists of voting for the mullahs or pulling the switch that drops the poison gas into the voting booth.

  14. waldo   16 years ago

    I wonder how much money THE UNITED STATES is pouring into these elections to tip them one way or another.

  15. thoreau   16 years ago

    Actually, Iranians elected a reformer in 1997 and 2001, but the President only has as much power as the mullahs allow him to have. Even Ahmadinejad is to some extent a figurehead. He's an idiot, and a vocal one, and the guys trying to keep the trains running on time (for their own power, of course) don't like him.

    Then again, Ahmadinejad is the sort of Real Iranian that you can sit down and eat a kabob with. Khatami is an elitist who wants to raise taxes on guys like Reza the Plumber. (Whose actual name is of course Ali, and he isn't a plumber, but soon he'll be in Baghdad as a "journalist" reporting "the good news from the Jihad.")

  16. BDB   16 years ago

    "In Iran a free election consists of voting for the mullahs or pulling the switch that drops the poison gas into the voting booth."

    Does your understanding of foreign politics consist of reading Little Green Footballs?

    Elections in Iran are fair*. Whether they MATTER or not, well...tell me, is A-mad a powerless figurehead or The Next Hitler(tm)?

    *Provided you aren't purged from the ballot. But if you make it on, as Khatami did, you can win.

  17. BDB   16 years ago

    It's a weird and compicated system with both democratic and authoritarian elements in it. But it isn't Saddam Hussein's Iraq. It is more like Venezuela.

  18. joe   16 years ago

    I never knew that libertarianish parties were yellow.

    Or that the Christian Democrats were black. I though anarchists were black, and centrist/center-right parties were blue.

  19. BDB   16 years ago

    "Or that the Christian Democrats were black. I though anarchists were black, and centrist/center-right parties were blue."

    Except in America. Where are left party is blue and our right party is red (!)

    I guess its kind of like how we write dates "backwards" and won't use the metric system.

  20. BDB   16 years ago

    I always thought Fascist parties were colored black.

  21. J sub D   16 years ago

    I never knew that libertarianish parties were yellow.

    Or that the Christian Democrats were black. I though anarchists were black, and centrist/center-right parties were blue.

    Libertarians are a raucous plaid. One that ran and bled when it went through the washer convention.

  22. joe   16 years ago

    BDB,

    Fascist parties are brown.

  23. joe   16 years ago

    Huh, wikipedia sez black has been used for fascist parties, too, as well as conservative parties.

  24. Jonah Goldberg   16 years ago

    "joe | February 9, 2009, 11:59am | #
    Huh, wikipedia sez black has been used for fascist parties, too, as well as conservative parties."

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

  25. joe   16 years ago

    Why do I have to be Mr. Pink?

  26. cuernimus   16 years ago

    Libertarians need to be black, for it is the color of our cold uncaring hearts.

  27. jtuf   16 years ago

    BDB,

    I roommed with an Iranian student in college for a semester. He told me that in Iran, if the clerics don't like who wins, they close down all the newspapers that supported him and call a new election.

  28. tassawwuf burrfoot   16 years ago

    no color says 'counterrevolutionary and reactionary' like Gold..."& put some frilly cuffs on that, while you're at it..."

  29. Not a Libertarian but You Migh   16 years ago

    Liberalism (in the classical and European sense) has been associated with yellow and orange.

    In Britain, of course, Toryism and thus conservatism have been associated with dark blue.

    I would imagine that this association was passed along to Commonwealth countries.

    [As an aside, is the Australian Liberal Party associated with any particular color?]

    Red obviously has long been associated with communism, socialism and social democracy. [as well, I would assume with many social liberal parties]

    I would guess that continental center-right parties are associated with the color black as many of these parties are Christian Democrat parties and thus have or did have a clerical alignment.

    The red and blue associations really didn't not exist in the US until the fall of 2000 and are only there now due to their random assignment by the Major Television networks in displays of the Electoral College.

    Did these color assignments by the networks previously have any rhyme or reason?

  30. heshaojie   16 years ago

    http://www.uggkick.com uggbooks

  31. heshaojie   16 years ago

    http://www.uggkick.com uggbooks

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!