Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Verification Nation

Immigration data mess

Kerry Howley | From the January 2008 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

In August the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) renewed its push for "E-Verify," a 10-year-old federal program also known as "Basic Pilot." The American Civil Liberties Union has a different name for it: a "permission slip to work." The system, which employers can use to check the immigration status of potential new hires against federal databases, is currently experimental and voluntary, but no one expects it to stay voluntary forever.

One state isn't waiting. By passing a proposal that state Rep. Russell Pearce (R-Mesa), its sponsor, humbly dubbed "the greatest bill in the nation," the Arizona legislature made use of E-Verify mandatory for all Arizona businesses starting January 1, 2008. Illinois took the opposite tack in August, prohibiting employers from using E-Verify until DHS could meet certain criteria for accuracy.

Because the databases it draws on are notoriously inaccurate, civil rights groups have long warned that E-Verify would prove disastrous for foreign-born American citizens and legal residents. The Social Security Administration estimates that 17.8 million of its records contain discrepancies that could lead to delays and false negatives. Employers are technically supposed to wait until such discrepancies are addressed before firing someone, but DHS has no mechanism for making employers pause until the government rechecks its data. A 2006 study by the Social Security Administration's inspector general found that 42 percent of employees surveyed said their employers were using E-Verify to screen employees before they were hired, suggesting that people burdened with inaccurate records may simply be passed over for jobs.

There's another problem with Arizona's law: It probably violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The federal government has jurisdiction over immigration, and the federal government has deemed the program voluntary. But DHS doesn't seem particularly concerned about Arizona. Instead, the department is suing Illinois, the state that barred use of E-Verify until its accuracy is improved.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Swiss, Please

Kerry Howley is author of Bottoms Up and the Devil Laughs: A Journey Through the Deep State.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (2)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. nfl jerseys   16 years ago

    jndshm

  2. political forum   16 years ago

    If E-verify is so inaccurate, then we need a redundant measure, otherwise people will be denied work through no fault of their own. It will essentially be a black list that people get placed on at random.

    Reggie

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Lawmakers Want To Stop Kids From Nicknaming Their Pokémon

Andy Jung | 8.29.2026 7:00 AM

9/11 Turbocharged America's Worst Foreign Policy Impulses—but Didn't Change Its Direction

Emma Ashford | From the August/September 2026 issue

Milo Yiannopoulos Wanted Millions Deported. He Didn't Mean Himself.

Billy Binion | 8.28.2026 5:22 PM

The CIA Is Making AI-Generated Reports for Local Police

Matthew Petti | 8.28.2026 4:31 PM

Judge Says Trump's Clampdown on Anthropic Violates the First Amendment

Tosin Akintola | 8.28.2026 3:41 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason