Blogged Down
Censoring the Web
In the last few months, legislators in both Texas and Tennessee have explored the idea of slapping blogs with special "online defamation" regulations.
A Tennessee proposal, pushed by state Sen. Jamie Woodson (R-Knoxville), would give bloggers two days to take down any statement a public figure deems defamatory. Those who fail to comply would face "a presumption of malice intent," and the statement would not actually have to be defamatory for the presumption to kick in.
Prominent bloggers have helped beat back this initial batch of bills, but the onslaught is probably just beginning. As blogs traffic in more video and start to look more like little broadcasters than Committees of Correspondence, politicians will want to regulate. Campaign ads, driven to the Internet by restrictions on old media, may spark a regulatory showdown.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
cgh