Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Foley Exonerated!

Julian Sanchez | 10.3.2006 11:53 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Over at The Poor Man, The Editors reveals the insidious MSM's shocking manipulation of one humble legislator's perfectly innocent IM conversations.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Paging Philip Zelikow

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Steven Crane   19 years ago

    article plz

  2. DavidS   19 years ago

    You tease...

  3. MikeP   19 years ago

    The article has been exfoleyated.

  4. Lamar   19 years ago

    Apply directly to forehead!!!!!

  5. wsdave   19 years ago

    MikeP,

    GROAN!!!

    Seriously though; Foley has said he's changed his ways, and is turning over a new page in his life.

  6. Joe Dokes   19 years ago

    Julian Sanchez has just become the world's biggest troll.

    Sorry Julian.

    Regards

    Joe Dokes

  7. Pro Libertate   19 years ago

    Until the inevitable correction, here's the link.

  8. Joe Dokes   19 years ago

    Julian Sanchez has just become the world's biggest troll.

    Sorry Julian.

    Regards

    Joe Dokes

  9. MikeP   19 years ago

    This is what Julian is trying to point to, but he's apparently laughing too hard.

  10. highnumber   19 years ago

    That's really really funny.

  11. Lowdog   19 years ago

    Were those actual texts from Foley?

    What an idiot.

  12. Pro Libertate   19 years ago

    Ugh. So that's the kind of stuff Foley was saying? Jesus. I'd like to think that neither the press nor the leadership was sitting on this kind of information. Not knowing for sure is one thing, letting him get away with this is another.

    My inclination is to believe that anything overt was unknown for quite a while, tying the hands of both the leadership and the St. Petersburg Times. That's the most likely explanation, because neither benefits by appearing to hold off on revealing information that was obviously not entirely secret. The leadership would be risking cover-up allegations and even the possibility of multiple resignations--way too much to protect a single seat temporarily--and the Times would be risking its credibility and getting scooped (as it was) by trying to delay publication to influence the election.

    Egad.

  13. Shelby   19 years ago

    I guess Foley thought somebody would be cleaning out the tubes. That are the internet, I mean. So there wouldn't be any incriminating reindeer text, or something.

  14. Stevo Darkly   19 years ago

    I've been trying to post something to the effect of "That was really funny" but H&R's fucking whore servers won't let me.

  15. Aresen   19 years ago

    PL

    I think it's more likely to be a 'deer-in-the-headlights' kind of freeze-up. They couldn't make up their minds as to what to do and may have been afraid to confront him.

    If the leadership had gone to him at the first whiff and said "Explain now or quit", then Foley would have been safely out of the picture before the story broke.

  16. Pro Libertate   19 years ago

    Maybe so. I think what we can be sure about is that everyone will lie about what they knew and when they knew it.

  17. Aresen   19 years ago

    PL

    Politicians LIE? Unthinkable!

    How could anyone imagine such a thing?

    😉

  18. Pro Libertate   19 years ago

    Aresen,

    I know, I know, what a disappointment. My faith in the goodness of our fearless leaders has been shaken.

    The paper is probably lying, too. I'm tired of all the lies. We need truth detectors.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

This 1,300-Page Anticapitalist History Gets a Few Things Wrong

Phillip W. Magness | 12.29.2025 7:00 AM

Is Zohran Mamdani Coming Around to Housing Deregulation?

Christian Britschgi | From the February/March 2026 issue

Bail Reform Faces Backlash as Policymakers Move To Require Cash Bond for Pre-Trial Defendants

C.J. Ciaramella | From the January 2026 issue

Brickbat: Wrong Side of the Bars

Charles Oliver | 12.29.2025 4:00 AM

Research Suggests People Who Work From Home Are Having More Babies

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the January 2026 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks