Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Nicotine Addiction Claims Another Life

Jacob Sullum | 8.9.2006 12:53 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Lawyers for an Ohio man convicted of strangling his ex-girlfriend to death argue that jurors rushed to a death sentence because they were hankering for a smoke and the judge refused to allow cigarette breaks.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: What are "outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment"?

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason. He is the author, most recently, of Beyond Control: Drug Prohibition, Gun Regulation, and the Search for Sensible Alternatives (Prometheus Books).

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Ethan   19 years ago

    Well, I guess Henry Fonda can't be on every jury.

  2. John   19 years ago

    Did they rush to a conviction or a death sentence? If they rushed to a conviction, that is a problem because he may be innocent. If they rushed to a death sentence, who cares? The dirt bag strangled an innocent women, let him fry.

  3. sage +P   19 years ago

    John,

    I think it was both, judging from the Sploid coverage of the story.

  4. Ruthless   19 years ago

    Back in the olden days, we smoked in the jury box.

  5. NoStar   19 years ago

    Jacob,
    A more succinct caption this entry would be Dying For A Cigarette

    (as always, the pun is intentional.)

  6. NoStar   19 years ago

    Sorry,

    A more succinct caption FOR this entry would be Dying For A Cigarette.

  7. Stretch   19 years ago

    Perhaps admitting to smoking is now a way to get out of jury duty.

    Don't juries get breaks every few hours to use the restroom anyway? Why can't they grab a quick smoke then? And if you're truly addicted to nicotine, is dipping allowed?

  8. crimethink   19 years ago

    Well, she was a sheriff's deputy in Licking County. She was just begging for it.

  9. joshua corning   19 years ago

    what the hell? I would walk out...what is the judge going to do call a miss-trial becouse a jury memeber went outside for a smoke?

  10. ChicagoTom   19 years ago

    what is the judge going to do call a miss-trial becouse a jury memeber went outside for a smoke

    Hold you in contempt and fine you heftily??

  11. crimethink   19 years ago

    joshua,

    Three words: Contempt Of Court.

  12. sigfried   19 years ago

    Most likely smoking is Verboten in the courthouse, period. With smoke detectors above the stalls in the bathrooms.

  13. Jennifer   19 years ago

    I was lucky that the one time I got a jury-duty notice they didn't actually use me, but I think it's crap that jurors are basically treated no better than criminals. Screw this business of me having to go through the metal detector and be searched before going into the courthouse--I didn't commit a crime and I didn't ask to be here, so what the HELL gives anybody the right to treat me that way?

    But I've decided: if I'm ever on a jury, even if the guy is guilty as sin I will tell the press that I voted him guilty because I was in a hurry to go outside and smoke. If that happens often enough maybe jurors will be treated a little more humanely.

  14. Robert   19 years ago

    One of the points I campaigned on for the NY senate in 2002 was holding the trial first, then sending video of it to jurors at home. The jurors wouldn't even be selected until the trial had concluded. If the jurors are unanimous (voting from home), it ends there. If not, then bring them together to deliberate.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Marjorie Taylor Greene Went From QAnon Acolyte to MAGA Exile

Jesse Walker | 1.5.2026 7:30 AM

Americans Are Increasingly Skeptical of Foreign Military Intervention

J.D. Tuccille | 1.5.2026 7:00 AM

Photo: These Lenses Can Slow the Progression of Nearsightedness

Bekah Congdon | From the February/March 2026 issue

Brickbat: Bad Gas

Charles Oliver | 1.5.2026 4:00 AM

Polymarket Returns to U.S. Users After a Nearly 3-Year Hiatus

Jack Nicastro | From the February/March 2026 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks