Laertes and the Witches
Friday fun link: Hamlet in the bush.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I remember hearing that story in one of my Anthropology classes. Things like that make me wonder how badly we misunderstand the stories and muths of other cultures, ourselves. 🙂
That title was so misleading. And now I'm due back at Pervert House.
Anything that takes longer than 2 minutes to read, and understand, shouldn't be a "Fun Link".
Worst. Fun link. Ever.
I disagree, CBG! I thought that was fascinating! Thanks, Jesse.
Took a few minutes, but well worth it!
Well worth it, for sure.
I enjoyed that. But then, I enjoyed hearing the sililoquy rendered in the "original" Kingon that like Hebrew doesn't utilize the verb to be.
not fun, not worth the read. She was lame. With a little forethought and preparation I'm sure the proper interpretation could have been conveyed. The notion that there is more than one proper interpretation of Hamlet, is of course preposterous.
That was really cool! Thanks, Jesse. I'm going to send it to some friends.