Laertes and the Witches

Friday fun link: Hamlet in the bush.

Comments

[Madog]

I remember hearing that story in one of my Anthropology classes. Things like that make me wonder how badly we misunderstand the stories and muths of other cultures, ourselves. 🙂

[SPD]

That title was so misleading. And now I'm due back at Pervert House.

[jcavar]

Anything that takes longer than 2 minutes to read, and understand, shouldn't be a "Fun Link".

[Comic Book Guy]

Worst. Fun link. Ever.

[linguist]

I disagree, CBG! I thought that was fascinating! Thanks, Jesse.

[AC]

Took a few minutes, but well worth it!

[wellfellow]

Well worth it, for sure.

[NoStar]

I enjoyed that. But then, I enjoyed hearing the sililoquy rendered in the "original" Kingon that like Hebrew doesn't utilize the verb to be.

[Warren]

not fun, not worth the read. She was lame. With a little forethought and preparation I'm sure the proper interpretation could have been conveyed. The notion that there is more than one proper interpretation of Hamlet, is of course preposterous.

[Larry Edelstein]

That was really cool! Thanks, Jesse. I'm going to send it to some friends.