Cutting Funds for Anti-Smoking Groups Reduces Heart Attacks!
Applying the same logic that is used to claim that smoking bans cause immediate, dramatic reductions in heart attacks, Michael Siegel finds that "sharp cuts in funding for anti-smoking programs" in Nebraska and South Carolina produced similar results.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If it saves one life . . .
You watch. That life saved will be the next Hitler.
SHUDDUP GODWIN!