Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

SOTU Highlights Via USA Today

Nick Gillespie | 1.31.2006 10:13 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Check 'em out here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: "The Permanent Division of Europe"

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (6)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. h-dawg   19 years ago

    "Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., stood and cheered. Many Democrats consider defeating Bush's Social Security program to be one of their more significant achievements in recent years."

    That's my Senator. Boy, do I feel well represented. And Hillary's the more fiscally responsible my two Senators!

  2. Ken Shultz   19 years ago

    "Yet there is a difference between responsible criticism that aims for success, and defeatism that refuses to acknowledge anything but failure. Hindsight alone is not wisdom. And second-guessing is not a strategy."

    I would add, Mr. President, that there is a difference between responsible criticism that aims for success, and triumphalism that refuses to acknowledge anything but success. Good intentions alone are not wisdom. And deflecting criticism in the name of patriotism is the traditional excuse for bad policy.

  3. Lou   19 years ago

    Ken - yep, pull out immediately is aiming for success. Gotcha. That's not criticism, that's Monday-morning quarterbacking for political advantage.

  4. James   19 years ago

    I'm not engaging in hindsight when I criticize the war. I knew it was a dreadful mistake from the get-go. Told everyone I knew. Bitched about it constantly. Nobody gave a shit what I thought. In fact, the government made it very clear it didn't give a shit what I thought. How do you figure I am remotely responsible for cleaning up the mess?

    They didn't want my opinion or my help in 2003 and they sneered that they didn't need my fucking support. So they don't get it now, Lou.

  5. Ken Shultz   19 years ago

    Who said anything about pulling out, Lou?

    In case you're interested, I don't know whether we should pull out--personally, I'm inclined to stay for the time being.

    However, regardless of whether the President wants us to stay or leave in the near future, I think we should be skeptical of his proposals. ...and that's because I think the President's incompetent.

    I believe his behavior in office demonstrates this incompetence, and I think his bogus justifications for the occupation of Iraq are an excellent example of that incompetence. ...and even if the President called me "unpatriotic", all day long, I woldn't stop pointing out his leadership failures, to every American I could get to listen.

    I consider it my patriotic duty. Tell me, what should a patriotic American do if he or she thinks that Presidential incompetence is at the heart of our problems? I consider it un-American to ask Americans--even the skeptics--to call it like they see it. ...That's right, "un-American"! I'm so grateful that our founders, in their great wisdom, sought to protect us from Presidents like this. ...Presidents like this and their supporters.

  6. Ken Shultz   19 years ago

    "I consider it un-American to ask Americans--even the skeptics--to call it like they see it."

    That should read, "I consider it un-American to ask Americans--even the skeptics--to stop callin' it like they see it."

    ...but you probably already know that.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Broad Ruling Against Trump's Immigration Policies Illustrates Alternatives to Universal Injunctions

Jacob Sullum | 7.3.2025 4:40 PM

Environmental Regulations Are Literally Baking Europeans to Death

Jack Nicastro | 7.3.2025 3:38 PM

Federal Prison Guards Allegedly Beat an Inmate to a Pulp. The Supreme Court Says He Can't Sue.

Billy Binion | 7.3.2025 2:48 PM

Jurassic World Rebirth Chases Summer Movie Nostalgia

Peter Suderman | 7.3.2025 1:40 PM

The $4 Trillion 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Breaks the Bank and Violates Congress' Own Budget Rules

Veronique de Rugy | 7.3.2025 11:25 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!