Let's Make it a Troika
To conclude our unlikely pre-Thanksgiving swing through the Land of Bear Fun, the lower house of the Russian Parliament just voted 370-18 to approve a favored tactic of paranoid authoritarians worldwide -- kick out the foreign non-profits.
In the debate in the Duma, one of the authors of the bill, Alexei Ostrovsky, expressed clear hostility to the work of Western-oriented groups, alluding to the government changes in Eastern Europe and blaming the US Central Intelligence Agency.
"We remember how those human-rights organisations defended human rights in Yugoslavia, Ukraine and Georgia under the cover of the CIA and we know how it ended," said Ostrovsky, a member of the nationalist Liberal Democratic Party. […]
About eight environmental protesters, objecting to the legislation, tried to unfurl flags and placards outside the State Duma building but were arrested for staging an unsanctioned demonstration.
Our own one-woman human rights organization, the Moscow-born Cathy Young, gave a withering nyet to Vladimir Putin and his American cheerleaders one year ago. Jesse Walker tried sorting through the competing Orange Revolution narratives last November, and two years back I wrote about the testy relationship between the biggest Eastern Europe non-profiteer of them all -- George Soros -- and those societies that still aren't so open.
(Link via Sploid.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I sometimes wonder how long it will be before we kick out the ACLU and Amnesty International. Yeah, I know, they aren't foreign (well, the ACLU isn't, not sure about Amnesty), but I'm sure we could find some people who thinks that this would be an excellent idea nonetheless.
How many Chinese or Russian NGOs are there in USA? Does your government allow Muslim charities who send money for weapons and military training in Arab countries? How about foreign NGOs that advocate returning Texas and California back to Mexico? Or those that want to overthrow Bush for a more democratic government? That is exactly equivalent to what USA's so-called NGOs are doing around the world. What is surprising is that not ALL countries have kicked them out yet. But it's only a matter of time, you ignorant fat retarded "Land of McDonalds" idiots.
Does your government allow Muslim charities who send money for weapons and military training in Arab countries?
Yes.
You're funny, Andrey.
andrey: i dont know about muslims, but i do no fro a fact that up untill 5 years ago it was legal to send money to the IRA and other irish terrorists groups from the US (and it still is legal to send to its political wing Sinn fien etc. and fronts for Irish Terrorism)
hey boris, i mean andrey...
go back to jerkastan
"We remember how those human-rights organisations defended human rights in Yugoslavia, Ukraine and Georgia under the cover of the CIA and we know how it ended,"
They got...human rights?
Not that I hold any brief for Mr. Putin or his gang of retrogressive clods, but I do think that the proliferation of NGOs is reaching saturation proportions. According to the BBC story on this vote, there are over 300,000 NGOs currently operating in Russia. While many of these are undoubtably doing valuable charitable and social work, a lot more of them are tub-thumping for fringe social or political causes of one sort or another.
It's not just Russia, either - NGOs are increasingly lobbying for quasi-governmental status in much of the Third World. Oxfam in particular seems less interested in pure charitable work than in left-wing political action in many of the countries in which it operates. Their fundraising literature is unabashedly anti-capitalist and pro-collectivist, which is why I stopped donating to them over a decade ago.
Putin is an authoritarian yo-yo, but I can understand his point of view. Why should he put up with a welter of completely uncontrolled NGOs, a substantial fraction of which appear to be actively involved in undermining his government? Authoritarian or not, no political entity will tolerate that sort of activity for long, and it's a reaction that the NGOs will have to anticipate will happen in country after country as long as they are tempted to try to short-circuit the political process in order to achieve their goals.
Still not really scared - nothing's hit the level of forcibly sedating that Kursk mother live on TV in 2000. Anyone else remember that? Very scary.
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/08/24/russia.needle/
Key quote:
"Jabbing a needle into the arm of a grieving woman is not about a new Russia, it's about the old one. It's about a vicious dictatorship. The nature of the beast remains unchanged - if it can't control something it will fight it."
Whatever cosmetic changes may have happened in the last twenty years, Machikha Nash lives.
Ajay, I remember that. And I wondered which was worse--a government doing that stuff in secret, or a government with no qualms about doing that stuff in public?
Aw, this thread is dying out already. I guess that shows that there really aren't many Republicians on this site.
Here in Syracuse we had a guy (Dr. Rafil Dhafir) get get 22 years in federal prison for sending charity donations to Iraq. The name of the charity was Help the Needy.
So no, he wasn't allowed to send money to Iraq ostensibly to help those we were vigarously trying to starve to death (hyperbole alert to those who need it). Yes, Madame Albright, 500,000 deaths was worth it.