Still Not Good Enough To Look the Auchinclosses in the Eye
Earlier today, I was invited to a luncheon reception at DC's Metropolitan Club honoring the 2005 recipients of the National Humanities Medal and the National Medal of Arts. Humanities medalists included the great Judith "Miss Manners" Martin, philanthropist Richard Gilder, and Alan Charles Kors (who over the years has penned memorable pieces for Reason). Medal of Arts winners included jazz great Wynton Marsalis, dancer Tina Ramirez, and one of the world's most underrated songwriters, Dolly Parton.
But despite all the incalculable intellectual and star power of those folks, I was there primarily to see Louis S. Auchincloss, the well-regarded novelist who also happens to be the last remaining specimen of the WASP. I have a tenuous yet meaningful personal relationship to him and his clan: My father's mother, you see, worked as a cook and a servant for the Auchincloss family during the Great Depression (well, I'm sure it was great for them--my grandmother and her kids had it kind of rough). Doesn't it say something great about America that the relationship between master and servant had evolved enough so that we could be in the same room some 70 years later, and me being able to eat the shrimp rather than serve it?
Alas, I never got a chance to see, much less meet, Auchincloss. It turns out that the Metropolitan Club rigidly enforces a dress code for men and my ensemble did not conform to their strict-constructionist definition of "business attire." Which is to say that my stylish (to my mind), yet scandalously open-necked, shirt and leather jacket combo offended more than the many ill-fitting jackets, ties, and pants in the room. In my defense, I certainly did not mean to offend, subvert, or transgress (and, with the exception of the car-washing outfit I wore recently on C-SPAN, I am even occasionally complimented on my clothes). In its defense, the club of course has the right to set and enforce any policy they want, though I'd be curious to know what "codes" other than dress codes they enforced until recently. And they did offer me use of a loaner jacket and tie, but by that point my mood had soured, so I declined (politely) and I was hustled out the door before any of the honorees were degraded by the sight of my fashion faux pas. The front door--not the servant's--so I guess America is delivering at least partly on its promise of mobility.
I only wish now we had thought to present this Solomonic sartorial standoff to Miss Manners for her to solve. And as for the Auchinclosses, I'm sure our descendants will meet up in another 70 years or so and wonder what took the reunion so long.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Gaius telling us all that Nick's leather jacket is a sign of the fall of western civilization in 5...4...3..
mediageek,
Certainly Barzun would find it a sign of such, and since gaius marius is a fan of barzun, well...
for god sakes buy a friggin collared shirt. Either that or move the hell out of DC.
and the books found in that link for Auchincloss look unreadable.
I never got to see the Carwash outfit....the link is broken every time I tried to click it (I mean the link on the old thread). I want to see the carwash outfit!
You should market little Nick Gillespie dolls. You could sell one with a carwash outfit, and another one with a little leather jacket ensemble.
I wouldn't necessarily buy one, but I bet you have a few internet stalkers who would. 🙂
"You should market little Nick Gillespie dolls. You could sell one with a carwash outfit, and another one with a little leather jacket ensemble."
the car wash outfit is the leather jacket ensemble...as for the doll just get a Wolverein doll with a Logan outfit and you would be set
smacky,
I've always wanted to buy philosopher and historian action figures. It be great if I could get a Heidegger or a Foucault or a David Brion Davis. 🙂
Come on, Nick, you couldn't have thought for one minute that an open-collared shirt and a leather jacket were "business attire."
Would you like some tiny S&M gear to go with your Foucault doll Hak?
mk,
Ha ha ha. Well, that could be the San Francisco version of the Foucault action figure. We could call him the "limit experience" version. 🙂
Gaius telling us all that Nick's leather jacket is a sign of the fall of western civilization in 5...4...3..
LOL. Mrs TWC said that Nick did not look like he was going out to mow the lawn last time around. I didn't see it.
Had the opportunity to share wine and break bread with Alan Kors several years back. He was funny, passionate, and generally seemed like a great guy. Might have been just a public face but somehow I don't think so.
Done name dropping and it's back to the tedious project-from-hell with a drop-dead deadline of money, I mean Monday.
No rest for the wicked regards, TWC
In Nick's defense, RC, I go to a lot of business meetings in DC, wearing a suit, and I am almost invariably overdressed. Granted, I am meeting with PR and IR people, and not the arts-and-letters crowd or policy wonks, but you'd be surprised at what passes for "business casual" in a lot of offices here.
Hak,
Yeah, you could sell it with a bag of bbs to put in it's rear-end.
Ok, with that I'm going home.
mk,
But you are right, Foucault has totally displaced Husserl as my favorite philosopher.
Cool "action figures" here:
http://www.accoutrements.com/actionfigures/index.html
Kevin
kevrob,
No Foucault, Husserl, Giddens, Heidegger, etc. though.
So, given that Nick acknowledges that they (a) have a right to set dress codes and (b) tried to help him comply with it...what's the point of this thread again?
Branding.
Speaking of which, is there a dress code for the DC H&R get-together? 😉
crimethink,
One must be wearing sackcloth or a hairshirt. 🙂
crimethink: I think proper attire is a 4:20 t-shirt and a sidearm.
Hakluyt,
You stand accused of criminal overuse of little smiley faces. How do you plead?
Not "not good enough". Evidently, not smart enough. Unless you arrived in DC off a turnip truck last week, any man over 22 should be smart enough to call and see if jackets are required for men.
anonymous coward,
Man is born without smileys, but is everywhere confronted by them.
I've always wanted to buy philosopher and historian action figures. It be great if I could get a Heidegger or a Foucault or a David Brion Davis. 🙂
http://www.accoutrements.com/actionfigures/index.html
I have the Einstein and Frued dolls already. Thanks for the link! I was hoping to find more online. They make great office decorations.
I want a Hitchens doll with real smoking and drinking action. Pull a string and it rubbishes Mother Teresa.
mk,
Ouch. 🙂
Yogi,
I've seen some of these action figures in stores.
Hak:
what about "My Dinner With Andre" action figures 🙂
Hakluyt-
Yeah, I found my two in a toy/novelty store.
this philosophy action figures page is brilliant. my favorite, from the "Ferocious Frege" action figure: "The number of times he's been beaten in battle is identical to the set consisting of all the sets the same size as the set of things which are non-identical with themselves!" and "Comes with Morning Star and Evening Star accessories (only one accesory included)." that's some quality humor right there.
hmm, preview indicates I can't include link in html? that can't be right.
well,
http://www.geocities.com/krinklyman2/powers.html
not long enough to blow the margins, I hope.
belle waring,
"Awful Augustine" is pretty funny too, as is "Spiteful Spinoza." 🙂
In all seriousness, those with kids might want to look into getting them these plush dolls
My daughter brought them to class for show and tell. they are actually quite cute.
those plush microbes are cute. another company makes similar toys of viruses. HIV=cuter than you thought!
I hope this is the last time I am ever moved to comment on an editor's style of dress.
Nick, I've seen you in a picture in what it sounds like you were wearing. There is something in your look that reminds me of a lot of the guys with whom I went to suburban high school. They wore their leather jackets in a similar way - with business shirts and such.
"...last remaining specimen of the WASP"?
Since when? The WASP is alive and well. You have heard of the Bushes, haven't you?
Hak:
Foucault is your favorite? Egad.
As for plush, you will have to journey far and wide to find something cooler than this.
you'd be surprised at what passes for "business casual" in a lot of offices here.
But the invite said "business attire", not "business casual." Its coded, sure, but I would never assume that business attire means anything less than jacket and tie. If they mean business casual, they know how to say it.
mk,
Those plush viruses are the coolest! Did you actually buy those for your daughter? You're the coolest!
Jason Ligon,
Better not show those Cthulu Valentines to Akira. He'll be handing them out to chicks with his phone number written on them!
If I ever got a Cthulu valentine from a woman, I would be very tempted to drop to one knee and propose right then and there.
I'm getting either one of the plush Old Ones or the mid sized plush Cthulu for a friend of mine's new baby. The hand puppet is tempting too
Jason Ligon,
Yes, for various allied reasons, not all of them having to do with his ouvre. From an intellectual perspective not so much my favorite.
Hak:
I think I get you. It may be the same kind of appreciation I have for Shopenhauer. He makes me laugh and at first seems to be a simple bogoted moron. Then, as you are laying in bed thinking about stuff, it occurs to you that he had a point somewhere in there.
Jason Ligon,
As far as soundness of intellectual work is concerned, that's a more difficult task because one has to create a set of criteria first (when I'm writing about Foucault its more of an emotional appraisal I suppose). Is it the pre-Socratics because they asked the original important questions? Aristotle because of his formal logic (or the important work he did in the Poetics)? etc.
It seems like an impossible and thankless task that may provide little in the way of reward. Better to say each philosopher of any merit has his or her balliwick and leave it at that.