Free Trade For Me But Not For China (EU Edition)
From CNN:
European Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson on Tuesday urged EU member states to back a plan to release millions of euros' worth of Chinese-made garments stuck in European ports, warning that a failure to do so could lead to economic hardship….
European customs officials impounded 75 million tons of Chinese-made bras, sweaters, trousers and other goods after Chinese exporters quickly exceeded the limits of a new quota system agreed in Shanghai in June.
Whole thing here.
A few days back, the Cato Institute's Marian Tupy pointed me to the following excoriation of the EU's trade protectionism by the Globalization Institute's Alex Singleton. Singleton notes that Mandelson himself agreed to the quotas back in June, after many of the impounded goods had already been ordered. That backtracking is symptomatic of a larger hypocrisy:
The EU's stance is perverse and immoral and will hit the weakest and poorest hardest, both in Europe and in China; it shows that Brussels' supposed commitment to economic development and solving world poverty is utterly worthless. In theory, since 1 January, the world has enjoyed free trade in textiles, a welcome development. But the EU is still allowed to impose anti-Chinese quotas until the end of 2008 as part of the Textile Specific Safeguard Clause which China agreed to as part of its ascension to the World Trade Organisation.
Whole thing here.
Earlier this year, Reason's Kerry Howley took on American protectionism re: Chinese textiles. That's online here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Singleton: "The European Commission has no business interfering in trade."
What's he trying to suggest? That we'd get to free trade quicker if each of the EU's national government's negotiated their own agreements with China?
This is a very long article... and boring.