Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Because Even Ombudsmen Need Counseling

Matt Welch | 6.15.2005 12:21 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

While hiring multiple ombudsvolk and issuing new decrees about Standards is a good first step, what the modern newsroom really needs to cure its ails is an in-house counselor. Or better yet, a "three-person, award-winning Employee Assistance Program." So suggests Jayson Blair.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Goin' Back to Neverland

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. NoStar   20 years ago

    And what is Charlie Manson's recommendation on ending violence and psychotic behavior?

  2. cdunlea   20 years ago

    Just what is this reason/libertarian fetish with ombudsmen? Did an ombudsman hurt you or your family? I don't see how that ties in with a libertarian philosophy.

  3. independent worm   20 years ago

    Oh for fuck sake. Why is anybody helping Blair re-relevant-ize his stupid self by linking to his weak, whiny-ass shit? Now he's pushing the "drugs and booze" made me do it line. Fucking lazy fiction writing wanker.

  4. Jennifer   20 years ago

    I'm far more likely than most non-Joe posters here to buy into the idea that employers have certain "responsibilities" toward their employees, but even *I* draw the line at thinking employers have to provide hand-holding for employees with mental problems. Christ. If my boyfriend dumps me and I get all depressed about it, maybe Jayson Blair can write a whiny blog post explaining why employers need to provide in-house dating agencies for their single workers.

  5. DB   20 years ago

    Blair's comments are directed at the HR/EAP programs that steered him to substance-abuse and mental-health counseling and assistance.

    These programs have nothing to do with ombudsmen or the news product -- they're health and welfare similar to those provided in all types of workplaces and in all types of industries.

    Blair's journalistic misdeeds were manifest. I've got no problem flogging him for those. I won't even quibble with cynics who say he's opining on this topic only to draw attention to himself.

    But rather than use the cheap "Jason Blair suggests" joke to get in yet another tired zing at obmudsmen, why not consider the real, and more important, questions:

    -- Do EAP programs provide real value to employees who need them?

    -- What are the implications of employers stripping away these programs and overall health and welfare benefits in order to cut costs?

  6. saw-whet   20 years ago

    independat worm,

    Now that's what I call a nose-bleeding rant! Rave-on, brother.

  7. saw-whet   20 years ago

    Sorry for the misspelling, independent. Laughing too hard. And I guess it should be "nose-bleed causing rant."

  8. Chuck   20 years ago

    EAPs are becoming the private sector version of drug courts. Instead of just firing an employee who is screwing up royally, (s)he now gets the opportunity to claim personal problems, substance abuse, recovered memories, or whatever, and "voluntarily" submit to the EAP's counseling services. Of course, use of these programs is going up dramatically, thereby proving that they are needed and should be more widely adopted.

    I have seen EAPs truly help some (a few) people. But that is not eo ipso proof (thanks, Julian!) that they need to be expanded.

  9. Larry A   20 years ago

    What today's newsrooms really, truly, desperately need are statisticians who can look at the latest "scientific study" and say, "This is crap." and/or, "This scientist has never made an accurate prediction in his/her whole career."

  10. independent worm   20 years ago

    Larry --- that and some people who know how to ask a damn follow-up question.

    saw-whet -- glad you enjoyed it! 🙂 i was actually in a good mood when i wrote that too.

  11. independent worm   20 years ago

    Just what is this reason/libertarian fetish with ombudsmen? Did an ombudsman hurt you or your family?

    Can't sleep... ombudsman'll eat me.... Can't sleep... ombudsman'll eat me.... Can't sleep... ombudsman'll eat me....

  12. mediageek   20 years ago

    If my boyfriend dumps me and I get all depressed about it, maybe Jayson Blair can write a whiny blog post explaining why employers need to provide in-house dating agencies for their single workers.

    Would it be crass of me to suggest that your argument is flawed based on the fact that you'd probably have an inbox stuffed full of phone numbers about five minutes after you became single?

  13. Jennifer   20 years ago

    Mediageek-
    Well, then Jayson Blair can write a post explaining why my employer needs to provide a discount travel agency, since chances are none of those Hit and Run phone numbers will be in the Connecticut area code.

  14. mediageek   20 years ago

    That works too.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Gutting of the National Park Service

Liz Wolfe | 6.2.2025 9:30 AM

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Armed, Elderly, and Dangerous

Charles Oliver | 6.2.2025 4:00 AM

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!