Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Casualties of Not-War

Julian Sanchez | 5.24.2005 11:24 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

A DEA administrator got awfully huffy when Cato's Radley Balko suggested that the government's attempts to stem "overprescription" of pain medications amounted to a war on doctors. So he's compiled a depressingly non-comprehensive list of collateral damage.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: You Can't Turn Zimbabwe Into Black Korea

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (27)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jeff   20 years ago

    What ever happened to that story about the doctor not treating the wife of the malpractice lawyer?
    And have any doctors refused to treat DEA officials?

  2. joe   20 years ago

    Six murder charges? Murder? You've got to be kidding me.

  3. Fabius   20 years ago

    Josephus,

    When you let government decide what's best for a supposedly free people, this is what you get.

    Not that something analogous would ever happen with urban planning.

    QFMC cos. V

  4. joe   20 years ago

    Fabius,

    And when you give armed police officers the authority to use force to enforce contracts, provide physical protection, and protect property rights, you eventually end up with Amadou Diallo being sprayed by bullets in a vestibule.

    This is either an argument for anarchism, or for political thought that goes beyond bumper sticker reasoning.

  5. Bumper Sticker   20 years ago

    joe is wrong

  6. Fabius   20 years ago

    "In February 1999, four New York City policemen searching for a rape suspect knocked on Amadou Diallo's door to question him. When he came to the door he reached inside his jacket, at which point the officers shot at him 41 times, hitting him with 19 bullets. The object Diallo was reaching for turned out to be his wallet." (WAPO)

    What has Diallo got to do with property rights or contracts? Seems more like poor training, police brutality and racism to me.

  7. dave_b   20 years ago

    Here in Louisiana, there has been a statewide crackdown on pain management clinics by the state and federal govt's. Now they're talking about a national database to track prescriptions to ensure that no one can fill the same prescription at multiple stores. Of course, the fact that the clinics are under such heavy surveillance has unintended consequences, but we have to think of the children. Remember, it's the clinics' fault.

  8. nmg   20 years ago

    Where are the drug war advocates? I have yet to meet one or even hear of one in the news unless it's an employee of the DEA. Other than that, who is advocating this madness?

    nmg

  9. joe   20 years ago

    Good of pretending not to notice the phrase "provide physical protection," Fabius. Remind me, do libertoids believe that the state has the duty to protect people from those who would harm their persons?

    But you are right about one thing: poor training, racism and brutality interfered with the cops ability to do their job. Do you conclude from this that there shouldn't be any police? No? Then why conclude that abuses by other branches of government do prove that those branches souldn't exist?

  10. thoreau   20 years ago

    I can already tell that this thread is going to turn into "everybody and his bumper sticker vs. joe"

  11. Fabius   20 years ago

    I didn't say protecting people because ...

    I don't see how the DEA is protecting anyone by persecuting doctors although I suppose they think they're protecting "drug abusers" from themselves.

    I don't see how the NYPD was protecting anyone by shooting Diallo although they probably thought they were protecting themselves - reaching while black and all that. (And they were trying to protect - as a byproduct of catching - any future victims of the rapist they were looking for.)

    I'm not sure I quite get your point. I made a cheap dig at urban planning and you went off about Diallo. I do not see the connection between Diallo getting shot and the DEA wigging out about pain doctors.

    Anyway, shouldn't you be planning or something right now? I understand the taxpayers pay your salary.

  12. dhex's bumper sticker   20 years ago

    Diogenes is my co-pilot

  13. Super Prole   20 years ago

    Only Related to Bumper Stickers

    Read no further if your looking for Joe-bashing.

    When I was a younger and much worse-behaved man, I defaced someone's bumper sticker. The self-satisfied prig had a bumper sticker that said "Another man against violence against women". I scratched off the "violence against part". That was wrong, destruction of private property and all that, but I'd like to think I'd do it again.

    SP

  14. Mr. Nice Guy's Bumper Sticker   20 years ago

    Nixon '96

  15. joe   20 years ago

    You know what Prole? You're just another man against men against violence against women.

    So there.

  16. Semolina Pilchard   20 years ago

    "The self-satisfied prig had a bumper sticker that said 'Another man against violence against women.' I scratched off the 'violence against part'."

    So, the resulting bumper sticker read, "Another man women"?

  17. Needy Guy   20 years ago

    My bumper sticker says ...

    "I'm for everything good and against everything bad. Love me."

  18. YourGoodBuddyJohnnyClarke   20 years ago

    What you're supposed to do is slap bumper stickers for a politician you hate on the painted surfaces of randomly chosen, expensive cars. This:
    1. Damages private property
    2. Angers your fellow citizens
    3. May reduce chosen pol's chances of election
    4. Increases employment at auto body shops
    5. Keeps you involved in the political process

    Why, the list of benefits just goes on and on!

  19. Super Prole   20 years ago

    "Another man against ... women"

    I was a lot more childish then.

    Also, I'm not very good at telling stories or typing.

    But apart from that and many other faults I am a net taxpayer and thus value-added to the social welfare state.

  20. jc   20 years ago

    I can already tell that this thread is going to turn into "everybody and his bumper sticker vs. joe"

    Yes, but the banner advertisers like it.

  21. joe   20 years ago

    Back on track, I think this is your strongest hand. A few ads with a widow describing her husband's inability to get proper treatment (and enough discipline to keep the blue druids from marching naked and shouting "my body my choice" and insulting school teachers) could go a long way.

  22. Stevo Darkly   20 years ago

    Wait, I didn't get to pass on my ideas for bumperstickers:

    Question authority. Because I said so.

    Give peace a chance. Arm the doves.

    Power to the Papal! [pro-Catholic thing]

    If you can read this, you probably didn't go to a public school.

    I'm apolitical and I vote!

    Has your dog hugged your leg today?*

    It takes a village to tease an idiot.*

    *Ideas from my dad. Once my dad took a Farmer's Auto Insurance bumpersticker, altered it, and put it on one of the family cars. No one else noticed it until my brother had a fender-bender, and the cop asked him, "Are you really insured by Farter's Insurance?"

  23. df   20 years ago

    For any minnesotans tired of the wellstone stuff:

    Park the Bus.

    In response to the sticker Hatred is Not a Family Value ~
    Teach children to hate hate.

  24. not really a lurker   20 years ago

    Nuke the Whales!

    and how 'bout the report in Paul Fussell's "Class" of a Stanford student re-arranging the letters into "Snodfart"?

    or the Princeton kid who used two stickers, kept the shield but re-arranged the letters into "stUPid University"

  25. dave_b   20 years ago

    I H8 the St8

  26. Brian   20 years ago

    joe: "Then why conclude that abuses by other branches of government do prove that those branches souldn't exist?"

    The abuses committed by the welfare state are guaranteed a priori, from the very nature of what the welfare state is and what it does. Abuses committed by the police, who are ostensibly entrusted with protecting our rights, are the outgrowth of a society in which individual rights are viewed with disrespect and even scepticism.

  27. joe   20 years ago

    Brian, the comment I was answering referred not to the efficient and legal functioning of the modern state, but to corrupt and abusive practices that violate the law.

    But you've just given away the game - you can yammer about corruption and rule breaking and abuses, but really, all that is just cover for your opposition to the honest, fair, and decent administration of the government.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The FBI Took Her $40,000 Without Explaining Why. She Fought Back Against That Practice—and Lost.

Billy Binion | 7.28.2025 5:21 PM

10 Years in Prison for Selling a T-Shirt of a Hugo Chávez Statue Getting Smashed

César Báez | 7.28.2025 3:52 PM

Why Is the Army Corps Still Harassing Idaho Landowners?

Sean Radomski | 7.28.2025 3:25 PM

Two Cases That Demonstrate the Incoherence of Trump's Immigration Policy

Joe Lancaster | 7.28.2025 2:05 PM

Pennsylvania's Liquor Monopoly Is Imposing a New Fee That Will Cost $15 Million Per Year

Eric Boehm | 7.28.2025 1:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!