Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Ix-Nay on the Rivatization-Pay

Jacob Sullum | 2.4.2005 2:19 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Greg Crist, director of communications for the House Republican Conference, liked my column on Social Security. Well, most of it. As he explained in an e-mail message, he did not care for my use of certain explicit language that he feels has no place in public discussion of the president's reform plan:

Every day, we fight reporters and Democrats for using the term 'privatization' b/c every poll worth its salt shows it frightens the public.

And here you write a great article, but use the term in the headline and everywhere else!

Can you help us out please? Dems love to demagogue. We shouldn't help them.

Bad as it is for Republicans to covertly buy the assistance of commentators, it may be worse when they assume you're on their team without having the decency to pay you. For the record, the word privatization appears only once in the column, and not in the headline. But I do use the word private half a dozen times to describe the individual retirement accounts about which the president promised: "The money in the account is yours, and the government can never take it away." He also described it as a "nest egg" that "you'll be able to pass along…to your children or grandchildren." Sounds pretty private to me.

Still, it's true that the contributions, investment choices, and withdrawals all would be regulated, so Crist has a point. Maybe "forced, socialized savings accounts" would be a better description, although I'm not sure how well it would poll.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: ATTN: Seattlites

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason. He is the author, most recently, of Beyond Control: Drug Prohibition, Gun Regulation, and the Search for Sensible Alternatives (Prometheus Books).

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (67)

Latest

Meta Removes ICE-Sightings Group After DOJ Outreach

Autumn Billings | 10.15.2025 5:05 PM

Even Marjorie Taylor Greene Thinks Trump's Immigration and Trade Policies Go Too Far

Jacob R. Swartz | 10.15.2025 4:50 PM

Democrats' Bill Would Let Federal Workers Skip Paying Rent During Government Shutdowns

Christian Britschgi | 10.15.2025 4:35 PM

Sarbanes-Oxley Promised To Protect Investors. It Ended Up Freezing Them Out.

Jared Dillian | 10.15.2025 12:55 PM

Trump Says Tariffs Are About National Security. Pentagon Officials Say They Need a Tariff Exemption.

Eric Boehm | 10.15.2025 12:20 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300