ATTN: Seattlites
I'll be on KOMO News Radio AM 1000 at 11:15 a.m., jabbering about the Seattle Times Co.'s decision to hike newsstand prices of both city dailies to 50 cents, and hopefully about how the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970 should be sent on the slow boat to Siberia.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Dude, I'm there.
Paul
Matt! You were fantastic! Now what for an encore?
Paul
Thank you!
Maybe an acoustic set of Nirvana covers?
Golly. Down here in Silicon-Valley-land, our esteemed San Jose Mercury News actually dropped the price of the daily paper a year or two ago, from $0.35 to $0.25, I believe to compete with online news services.
Will The Post-Intelligencer's marginal fans stay away in droves? Stay tuned to this Bat-channel!
I don't buy their printed media. However, the Times website is my daily source for all things Puget Sound.
I didn't make the broadcast. Is there a transcript somewhere?
Newspaper Preservation Act, is that the same as the Clean Birdcage Law?
I'm a bit confused here. I would think that libertarians (at least the hard-core variety who oppose the antitrust laws) should welcome any law that--however arbitrarily--exempts some companies from such laws (just as they should welcome any tax loopholes, however arbitrary, on the ground that they do after all reduce the government's revenue).