Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Bankrupt Critique

Julian Sanchez | 2.3.2005 2:26 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

So, Bush got heckled during the speech, and then critiqued on the CNN after-commentary by Sen. Feinstein (and probably a couple other talking heads I didn't see) for using the term "bankrupt" to describe Social Security in 2042. But I'm not clear exactly why that is wrong. We all realize that people who declare bankruptcy are not totally out of money, right? Their debts just exceed their holdings. Which (even if you count the trust fund as a real asset) would be true of Social Security. It could still (assuming no reform) pay 70 percent of scheduled benefits, but isn't that consistent with the more familiar sort of bankruptcy? In other words, the bankrupt person's assets get divvied up, and they get to keep working and eating even if they can't fully discharge the debts. Now, "bankrupt" has a stronger connotation than "unable to pay all benefits," and maybe the intention was to mislead somehow. But, at least technically, isn't it an admissible description?

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Frenched Up

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (36)

Latest

What I Saw at the No Kings Rally in New York City

Nick Gillespie | 10.18.2025 4:46 PM

Utah's New Union Law Faces a Ballot Box Battle

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 10.18.2025 7:00 AM

Javier Milei's Libertarian Experiment is in Jeopardy. Argentina's Midterm Elections Will Determine Its Fate.

César Báez | 10.18.2025 6:30 AM

Needlessly Strict Federal Rules on Radiation Exposure Are Stalling Nuclear Power Development

Ronald Bailey | From the November 2025 issue

Trump Erroneously Thinks Killing Suspected Smugglers Is the Key to Winning the Drug War

Jacob Sullum | 10.17.2025 4:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300