Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Blue Dog Gone

Charles Paul Freund | 1.24.2005 2:32 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Mark Shields notes that in the struggle to reform Social Security, the White House has outsmarted itself politically. "The president will be without one of the great Democrats that he could have relied upon for counsel," observes Shields, "because of the incredibly short sightedness of the White House and Tom Delay -- Charlie Stenholm, Democrat from West Texas, blue dog Democrat."

Blue dog Democrats, as Shields puts it, are those who "believe in things like fiscal sanity, who oppose tax cuts but oppose big liberal spending, but continue to be Democrats. And Charlie Stenholm . . . was in favor of privatizing part of Social Security, one of the principal advocates." The White House has no allies among House Democrats for its Social Security plan, though "if Charlie Stenholm was in the House of Representatives today, he would get a minimum of ten or a dozen Democrats to join."

What happened is that, in "a naked power grab, Tom DeLay and the Republicans of Texas, with Karl Rove's complicity, wrote Charlie Stenholm out of Congress." The GOP Texas redistricting scheme "abolished his congressional district. I say that because the Democrats understand that that's the first thing, even if you are with them, it is not going to do you any good with this White House. I mean, Charlie Stenholm has been an open, not supporter, but a guy who has been certainly open to all the initiatives. If that's his fate, then why should we [remaining Democrats] cooperate on something like this?"

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Catch-22 for Murderers

Charles Paul Freund is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (23)

Latest

Texas Can't Force Book Vendors To Rate Books According to Sexual Content, District Court Decides

Brian Doherty | 10.28.2025 6:15 PM

Trump's Appeal of His New York Convictions Highlights the Absurdity of Alvin Bragg's Convoluted Case

Jacob Sullum | 10.28.2025 5:50 PM

Bill Gates Admits That Climate Change 'Will Not Be the End of Civilization'

Jeff Luse | 10.28.2025 4:31 PM

Abolish Property Taxes?

Christian Britschgi | 10.28.2025 12:45 PM

'We Proudly Make Things Here': California Distillery Owner Says SCOTUS Should Dump Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 10.28.2025 11:45 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300