Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Secrets and Laws

Jesse Walker | 1.19.2005 10:36 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Another mystery regulation from the TSA. Or from an airline applying a unique interpretation to the TSA's rules. Or just from an airline using the TSA as an excuse. Who can tell?

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: "Britain's Abu Ghraib"

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (20)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Thomas Paine's Goiter   20 years ago

    After several minutes, her supervisor appeared and said, after introducing himself, “Sir, this is for your own protection.”

    Oh well, you should have said so! Please, let me give you a complete rundown!

  2. Isaac Bartram   20 years ago

    God, I am so glad I don’t need to fly.

  3. Mo   20 years ago

    Funny, when I was going through customs, after the customs agent found out I had been in Egypt, he asked me what I did and who I worked for. My girlfriend, who had the same itinerary, but an Anglo name, didn’t get asked the question. Since, I had a connecting flight, I decided to answer the question without a stink.

  4. Russ D   20 years ago

    Keeping my friends names and adresses a secret from total strangers would be for my own (and their own) protection.

  5. Brendan Perez   20 years ago

    Is it a crime to lie about who you’re staying with?

    “Who’s Jack Mehoffer and Richard Harder?”
    I was going to suggest the default and cliched “Michael Hunt”, but figured it was too obvious. Well, maybe not, we are talking TSA personnel here…

    Side note-I had a slightly “learning disabled” kid in my high school art class named Richard Harder. He never passed up an opporitunity to put down “Harder,Dick” as his name.
    /good times

  6. Call me snake   20 years ago

    Why is the rest of the story omitted in the link? Did “Take Scissors Away” force him to surrender his friends’ addresses to the database?

    Was he subjected to more official harrassment/intimidation after his protests to the supervisor?

  7. Skeptikos   20 years ago

    Anyone who actually reads the link (and the link to the letter he sent) will note that after he challenged the “potentially” non-existent reg (is a law really a law if a bear can’t hear it from the pope’s ass…or something like that) it was determined that since he was a platinum flyer with AA, whe did not have to comply with said attempt at Leninism.
    “Sir, I’m sorry, you are a Platinum AAdvantage member and shouldn’t have been asked this
    question.”-Supervisor

    Cory’s question in his letter to AA: Do non-Platinum flyers have to provide dossiers on their friends on demand from an AA officer? Why?

    My Question…I love CD’s work, especially Down and out in the magic kingdom….I know he lived in the US prior to moving to the UK, where does he hold his citizenship, I think he is a US citizen, for what miniscule value that has in the face of our new found love of soviet style rules and regs.

  8. Skeptikos   20 years ago

    Brendan Perez,

    It is almost always illegal to lie to a fed. Check out Martha Stewart, not convicted of lying under oath, not convicted of insider trading, but convicted of lying to fed agents.
    You may have the right to not speak, but when you do….

  9. SR   20 years ago

    Goiter, the “It’s for your own safety” line appears to be incredibly effective on the sheeple, based on the travelers I see interviewed every time a new (almost certainly useless) security measure is imposed. “A full body cavity search for my 8 year-old daughter? Well, if it makes flying safer….”

  10. Cory Doctorow   20 years ago

    I’m a Canadian, actually — also, keep in mind that this *wasn’t* a fed! These questions were posed by the *airline*, who said that the Feds required them to ask them.

  11. thoreau   20 years ago

    I don’t think people would feel safe is flying was convenient.

  12. Ayatollah Usoe   20 years ago

    I’ve so far been rather unsuccessful in getting others around me on the snaking TSA lines to hum “We shall overcome” along with me.

  13. Stevo Darkly   20 years ago

    I don’t know how “We Shall Overcome” goes, but while in line I can go “moo” or “baa.”

  14. Stevo Darkly   20 years ago

    … or I can say, “There’d better be a damn big piece of cheeze at the end of this maze.”

  15. Thomas Paine's Goiter   20 years ago

    Goiter, the “It’s for your own safety” line appears to be incredibly effective on the sheeple

    SR, praytell, what on earth would make you say such a thing? I know that what the people in charge do for me is in my own best interests, don’t you?

  16. Jack   20 years ago

    Somebody’s been watching “Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events”.

  17. David   20 years ago

    Stevo, you can’t say any of those things. There a sign posted at the beginning of the line that specifically outlaws indigination.

    That and if you’re too snippy, the TSA guard can use his powers to detain you at his discretion. For any reason he that pops in his head.

    Don’t forget to take off your shoes.

    The sad part is that any creative and determined person can get what they want onto a plane, while Johnny Testosterone frisks old ladies.

  18. McClain   20 years ago

    Customs handles international incoming, not TSA.
    TSA only worries about who and what gets on planes inside the US.
    And if you don’t like the lines and searches: would you prefer no searches? More cursory searches? Arm every wingnut who wants to fly? Hire one federal security agent for every prospective flyer?

  19. McClain   20 years ago

    And, yeah, if you cause trouble you will almost certainly miss your flight, probably pay a fine, and possibly go up on charges, depending on how annoying you are.
    If you’ve ever worked retail, picture the obtuse, snippy customers getting up in your face, claiming they’re “always right.” Then remember that TSA isn’t selling anything, and doesn’t have to worry about turning a profit.

  20. McClain   20 years ago

    But, yeah, as for the original article:
    people impersonate cops, airline people might pull stuff and claim it’s ‘TSA rules.’
    Question authority, yeah, especially authority that smells fake.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Tariffs Are Breaking the Manufacturing Industries Trump Says He Wants To Protect

Eric Boehm | From the July 2025 issue

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!