Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Hair-Splitter Nitpicked

Matt Welch | 11.30.2004 3:36 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Jack Shafer reference-checks William Safire.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: If the Devil is Six, then Ridge is Seven

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (9)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. wellfellow   22 years ago

    Please, all Shafer did was verify that the term used by Safire wasn't journalistic vernacular, which says nothing about the accuracy of the charge.

  2. Ruthless   22 years ago

    "keeper" versus spiked

    And to think Safire has been known to criticize his colleague and my sweetie, Maureen Dowd, for using esoteric words.

  3. PapayaSF   22 years ago

    I'm not surprised Safire knows words that other people don't: he's been in the business a long time (he's probably got 20 years on any of the journalists Shafer asked), and he writes books on language, for heaven's sake. And, as wellfellow points out, Shafer seems to think if he can't find enough references to the term, that he's somehow proved the practice is rare or non-existent. Here's a recent one: the LA Times' late sexual harassment hit on Arnold, just before the recall election.

  4. Morat   22 years ago

    You are aware that just BECAUSE a story comes at a politically oppurtune time doesn't mean that the story's release was politically timed, right?

  5. PapayaSF   22 years ago

    Morat: It's not conclusive, but there's some evidence that the LA Times' stories were politically timed.

  6. Tim Higgins   22 years ago

    Wellfellow,

    See title of post. Thank you.

  7. Steve   22 years ago

    Papa,

    There's much stronger evidence than that:

    http://www.jillstewart.net/php/issues/issue1014.php

  8. wellfellow   22 years ago

    Tim,

    Point taken, however, if the thrust of the story had been that Safire was merely being nitpicked, that'd be rather banal. Let us not pretend that Shafer was genuinly interested in etymology. So, Tim, read between the lines. Thank you.

    Morat, did anyone suggest that?

  9. Tim Higgins   22 years ago

    wellfellow,

    I may have misunderstood your remark - did you mean it to be directed at Shafer (I took it to be directed at Welch)? I agree entirely that Shafer's article was petty, and I'd infer from the headline that Welch agrees. In fact, Shafer is "nitpicking," but that is a criticism, not a description. I'm sure Shafer thought (foolishly) that he was casting doubt on Safire's conclustion. In any case, my bad if your remark was directed at Shafer and not Welch.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Promised Transparency. His Administration Keeps Finding New Ways to Hide Records.

Matthew Petti | 8.15.2026 8:00 AM

New Jersey Revives the Fight To Reclassify Gig Workers as Employees

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 8.15.2026 7:00 AM

Colombia's New President Wants More U.S. Military Help Fighting Cartels

Tosin Akintola | 8.14.2026 4:23 PM

The War on Free-Range Kids Makes The New York Times

Lenore Skenazy | 8.14.2026 3:55 PM

Virginia Man Argues His 'FTP&ATF' License Plate Is Free Speech. The Supreme Court Might Hear His Case.

C.J. Ciaramella | 8.14.2026 3:11 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason