Exporting America's Fiscal Responsibility
Dan Drezner notes that federal "Buy American" rules have added some $400 million to the cost of an already obscenely overbudget construction project in California. Foreign steel would be 23 percent cheaper than domestic, but it'd have to be 25 percent cheaper for it to be legal to use it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Considering this is a federal law, I don't really see your point Richard. Unless Boxer or Feinstein were behind it.
Off topic; can someone please give me information about extant Liberterian Parties in Upstate New York. Come on, you guys in Albany, give me a call. This is the time to get motivated.
Quick somebody figure out how much we taxpayers are paying for each steel job "saved" as a result of this policy.
I bet steel workers would consider themselves better off if they had to take the next best job and available and got a nice side payment of $100,000. Even if it was $399,999 we could buy foreign steel for this project, lay off 1000 U.S. steel workers and make everyone better off.
Inefficient rent seeking. Nothing more, nothing less.
OK so I misspelled a word or two, but I am sincere. Boy, how could I misspell Libertarian. Bifocals-need-adjusting, ork...
Most of the cost of this obscenity is for vanity - a suspension bridge over a mudflat where a viaduct would have served equally well and with a damn sight lower construction and maintenace cost.
Did you bother to read the comments? According to one of the commentators, the bridge would have had to contain about a zillion tons of steel to make up that $400 million. I'd imagine that the actual amount is either less or it's due to other factors.
And the comments also state that they were originally confused about the Buy American requirement and, in truth, they are allowed to accept the foreign steel bid.
Of course, if they had saved the tolls collected on the Bay Bridge since they paid for the original construction, they could build the replacement bridge out of gold.
After learning this, is anyone surpised at California's massive budget deficits?
Here's my interview with Libertarian Party presidential candidate Badnarik.
Via my giant antenna, I have just learned that Libertarian Party candidate Badnarik is going to be subjected to a probing interview tonight.
China can make stuff cheaply because: workers are slaves, toxic waste is dumped in the nearest river, quality standards are non-existant and their government wants leverage against us.
We should not restrict imports from developed, democratic countries. We should very much restrict imports from evil and enemy regimes.
Did that work really well in Iraq?
Is that working really well in Cuba?
Singapore Singapore 1 Singapore 2 Singapore 3 Singapore 4 Thailand Thailand 1 Thailand 2 Thailand 3 Thailand 4 Japan Japan 1 Japan 2 Japan 3 Japan 4 Hong Kong Hong Kong 1 Hong Kong 2 Hong Kong 3 Malaysia Malaysia 1 Malaysia 2 Malaysia 3 Taiwan Taiwan 1 Taiwan 2
East Asia Hotels East Asia Guide Euro Asia Hotels Come to Asia Hotels plus Tours My Europe Hotels